CIN | U70200DL2015PTC281147 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | E-15/120, FIRST FLOOR SECTOR-8, ROHINI DELHI North West DL 110085 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the diverse and growing real estate market of India, making an informed decision about builders is paramount, especially for first-time homebuyers. In this post, we will examine SUPER MAX AFFORDABLE HOUSING Private Limited, a builder operating in Haryana, assessing their performance based on legal outcomes and overall reliability.
The builder has faced one complaint; however, it is crucial to highlight that they were able to win the case. The details surrounding the case revealed that the information required from the builder was submitted properly and found to be in order, indicating proactive management and compliance on their part.
Overall, SUPER MAX AFFORDABLE HOUSING Private Limited comes across as a reliable builder within Haryana. The track record of managing legal disputes effectively is commendable, particularly given the current real estate climate where buyer security is a priority.
In conclusion, dealing with a builder like SUPER MAX AFFORDABLE HOUSING Private Limited presents potential homeowners in Haryana with an opportunity for affordable housing backed by reliable legal practices.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SUPER MAX AFFORDABLE HOUSING Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into several common themes that highlight the primary disputes encountered by the builder. These include claims related to delayed possession, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion or classification, and penalties for project delays. Each type of claim reflects distinct concerns that buyers or regulatory bodies had regarding the developer's performance and adherence to legal standards.
Many cases arose from assertions of delays in project completion and complaints regarding penalties imposed for these delays. Additionally, some claims centered on allegations relating to the classification or conversion of land, which led to disputes over the legality of certain actions taken by the builder.
The common thread among the claims against the builder often stemmed from a perceived lack of communication, dissatisfaction with the expected timelines, or misunderstandings of the regulatory landscape. Claimants often sought legal remedies to contest penalties that they believed were unjust, as well as seeking compensation for perceived damages due to project delays. These patterns depict a scenario where emotional investment by buyers in their properties may have led to heightened feelings of discontent, prompting legal action even in cases where the builder operated within legal parameters.
SUPER MAX AFFORDABLE HOUSING Private Limited managed to win these cases often due to a lack of sufficient evidence from the opposing parties or failures in following established legal or regulatory pathways. Many claims were found to be exaggerated or based on misinterpretations of the contract terms or land classification rules, allowing the builder to successfully defend itself from what could be viewed as unwarranted allegations. Such outcomes reflect a significant capability on the part of the builder to navigate legal challenges effectively.
This analysis indicates a favorable depiction of the builder's reputation in a challenging real estate market. It reinforces the notion that buyers occasionally encounter disputes that may lead to misdirected accusations against builders, which could encourage litigation. Therefore, the successful defense of these cases speaks to the builder's diligence and its robust operational protocols in ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations.
To potential buyers, it is crucial to approach real estate transactions with informed scrutiny. While legitimate disputes do exist in the real estate arena, cases like those involving SUPER MAX AFFORDABLE HOUSING Private Limited demonstrate that builders can often mount effective defenses against unjust claims. It is advisable for buyers to conduct thorough research and verify claims substantively before forming opinions or taking action against builders.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!