SUPERTECH LIMITED

Overview of SUPERTECH Limited

SUPERTECH Limited is a well-known builder operating primarily in Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, and Karnataka. However, the company has faced significant legal challenges, as indicated by its recent statistics: 320 complaints have been registered against it, of which it has lost 282 cases and only won 38. This raises critical questions about the builder's reliability and commitments to its customers.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Cases Lost by SUPERTECH Limited

1. Common Factors in Lost Cases:
   • A significant number of lost cases revolve around delays in possession of flats. Complainants frequently allege that Supertech did not hand over possession by the promised date, resulting in claims for refunds and compensation.
   • Many cases highlight the failure to comply with the mandates of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, particularly concerning timely deposits and adherence to scheduled delivery dates.
   • The issue of force majeure was raised by Supertech in …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder SUPTECH Limited, which it lost, reveals key insights about the nature of disputes and the recurring challenges faced by the builder. The disputes can be grouped into several common themes, such as Compliance with Legal Provisions, Delayed Possession Claims, Requests for Extension of Time, Penalties for Regulatory Violations, and Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions.

1. Compliance with Legal Provisions: Many cases revolved around the builder's failure to adhere to the provisions set forth in the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The builder frequently claimed compliance but often fell short of meeting the legal requirements, resulting in dismissed appeals.
2. Delayed Possession Claims: A significant number of disputes involved allegations of late possession. Allottees contended that construction was lagging and claimed late delivery possession charges. The builder's defense often rested on the argument that the due date for possession had …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SUPERTECH Limited, which it won, revealed some interesting insights.

The complaints can broadly be categorized into several themes, including:

• Delayed Possession Claims: Several cases were centered around claims of delayed possession of flats. However, in these instances, the builder successfully demonstrated that the projects were registered and delineated due dates for possession, thus dispelling claims of delay.
• Withdrawal of Complaints: A notable number of cases were withdrawn by the complainants, either with the intent to file fresh complaints or due to mutual settlements. This indicates that many claims may not have been pursued vigorously or were not substantiated adequately.
• Moratorium-related Cases: Multiple cases were affected by a moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which led to cases being kept in abeyance. This often demonstrates the complexities surrounding financial or legal constraints rather than direct actions from the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis