CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When considering a builder for a significant investment like real estate, the reputation and reliability of that builder play crucial roles in making an informed decision. In this article, we take a closer look at Supertech Project and Construction Private Limited, a builder operating predominantly in Chhattisgarh, and analyze the legal challenges they have faced. We also provide tips that can help potential buyers navigate the often-complex landscape of real estate dealings.
Supertech Project and Construction Private Limited is a developer that has ventured into real estate projects primarily in Chhattisgarh. With a modest number of complaints filed against them, the company has seen a stark outcome in legal disputes, with two cases lost and no victories.
The builder has faced a total of two legal complaints:
Interestingly, there are no recorded cases where Supertech has won. This distinctive absence of victories points towards a systemic challenge they face in legal disputes, which could diminish buyer trust moving forward.
The legal history of Supertech Project and Construction Private Limited is a cautionary tale for potential buyers. With both cases resulting unfavorably for the builder and no successful defenses, it raises red flags regarding their reliability and accountability.
In conclusion, while Supertech Project and Construction Private Limited operates in a growing real estate market in Chhattisgarh, the builder's track record warrants careful consideration for prospective buyers. By applying the tips outlined, you can safeguard your interests in any real estate investment.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Supertech Project and Construction Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily revolve around two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Penalties for Project Delays.
In the cases summarized, the applicants consistently claimed that they had paid a significant portion of the agreed-upon price for their plots, yet the builder failed to execute the registry deed and hand over possession. This points to a troubling trend where buyers were left in limbo after making substantial financial commitments. The builder's defense often revolved around the contention that delays were caused by external factors, particularly the time it took to obtain necessary development permissions. However, the Authority did not accept this reasoning, indicating that the responsibility for timely project completion and fulfillment of contractual obligations rests with the builder.
A pattern emerges from these cases: buyers were primarily motivated to take legal action due to the builder's inability to meet contractual deadlines and fulfill their promises. The common triggers for litigation were the failure to deliver possession of the property and execute the required legal documentation, which reflects a lack of transparency and accountability from the builder’s side.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their inability to meet the obligations outlined in the sales agreements. The repeated failure to deliver timely possession and complete the registry process resulted in legal consequences, including the requirement to pay interest on the amounts received from the buyers. This trend indicates systemic issues within the builder's operations, possibly related to project management, regulatory compliance, or financial instability, all of which are critical factors to consider when evaluating a builder's credibility.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!