SUPREME DEVELOPERS logo

SUPREME DEVELOPERS

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate, it is crucial for buyers to conduct thorough research before committing to a builder. One such builder is Supreme Developers, which operates primarily in Gujarat. This article aims to provide an insightful overview of Supreme Developers based on the legal track record pertaining to their business practices, highlighting potential risks for future homeowners.

Overview of Supreme Developers

Supreme Developers has encountered limited legal scrutiny, with only one complaint filed against them. However, it is worth noting that they have lost this singular case, raising questions about their business practices. Here’s a closer look at the specifics of their legal involvement:

  • Number of Complaints: 1
  • Cases Won: 0
  • Cases Lost: 1
  • States with Projects: Gujarat

Legal Insights:

Case Details

The case against Supreme Developers involved accusations of failing to submit obligatory quarterly reports required by law. As a result, the Gujarat Real Estate …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Compliance Disputes Failure to Communicate Project Updates

Analysis of the cases filed against Supreme Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. Notably, the cases highlight ongoing issues related to regulatory compliance and the builder's failure to communicate project updates as required by law.

The first theme, Regulatory Compliance Disputes, encompasses the builder's difficulties adhering to the legal framework surrounding real estate projects. In one significant case, Supreme Developers was penalized for failing to submit quarterly reports on their project, which is a mandatory requirement according to the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority. This highlights a pattern where the builder has faced challenges in meeting regulatory standards, leading to legal repercussions.

The second theme, Failure to Communicate Project Updates, is closely related to the first and showcases another dimension of the builder's non-compliance. The requirement for quarterly reports serves the purpose of keeping stakeholders informed about project progress. By neglecting this duty, Supreme …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review

Interested in buying from SUPREME DEVELOPERS?

Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.