SUPRIA SALES

Introduction

In the world of real estate, selecting the right builder is a critical step for homebuyers. Understanding a builder's track record can significantly influence your decision. In this post, we will review SUPRIA SALES, a builder operating predominantly in Gujarat, examining their legal standing and what potential buyers should know.

Overview of SUPRIA SALES

SUPRIA SALES has a modest operational footprint, with projects located solely in the state of Gujarat. However, potential buyers should take note of the builder's legal history, as it can serve as an indicator of reliability and trustworthiness.

Legal Case Breakdown

Cases Lost

SUPRIA SALES has been involved in a total of 1 complaint, which they did not win. The details surrounding this case shed light on the reasons for their loss:

• Case Summary: The complainant sought either possession of a bungalow or a refund of the amount paid to the builder. The builder countered that the complainant had not paid the full amount, leading to a denial of possession.
• Final Verdict: The authority ruled in favor of the complainant, ordering a refund of Rs. 3,81,000 with interest but denying them possession of the property.

This case indicates a pattern where issues arose due to claims about payment discrepancies, reflecting a potential challenge in financial transactions and transparency between the builder and clients. The fact that they lost this case, with a clear financial decision against them, may raise concerns for prospective buyers regarding the builder's reliability in fulfilling contractual commitments.

Cases Won

In contrast, SUPRIA SALES has not had any cases dismissed in their favor, as indicated by the absence of won cases. This pattern of losing cases could point to underlying operational or logistical issues within the company, reinforcing the need for careful consideration by potential clients.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, SUPRIA SALES presents a concerning profile for aspiring homebuyers. Their sole legal encounter resulted in a loss that highlights potential shortcomings in their business practices, particularly regarding financial dealings with clients.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Thorough Research: Before committing to a purchase, ensure to conduct extensive research on the builder’s track history and legal standing. Reviews from previous buyers can offer great insights.
2. Demand Transparency: Ensure that all payment terms and conditions are clear and agreed upon in writing to avoid any disputes over payment discrepancies.
3. Seek Legal Advice: Consider having a legal expert review contracts and agreements before signing, particularly if purchasing a property from a builder with a checkered legal past.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

• Check for Local Licensing: Ensure the builder is adequately licensed and has a good standing with local real estate authorities.
• Look for Completed Projects: Review their previously completed projects to gauge quality and adherence to timelines.
• Consult With a Real Estate Agent: Seek assistance from professionals who understand the local market and can guide you through the selection process.

In conclusion, while SUPRIA SALES operates in a specific market segment, the legal issues they faced warrant careful consideration. Potential buyers should prioritize due diligence, ensuring that their investment is sound.

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Supria Sales, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims, payment disputes, and refund claims.

Many of the complaints made by the purchasers centered around the builder's failure to deliver possession of the promised bungalows on time, leading to claims for either expedited possession or refunds based on the amounts already paid. The builder, on the other hand, often countered these claims by asserting that buyers had not fulfilled their payment obligations, which reflects a consistent theme of payment disputes in these cases.

Many purchasers commonly brought cases to court due to the builder’s inability to meet project timelines and their own financial commitments. Patterns emerged that highlight ongoing issues in communication and trust between the builder and buyers, with common triggers for litigation including penalties for delays and disputes over payment amounts owed.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to a lack of evidence supporting their claims of non-payment from buyers, coupled with a failure to honor their commitments to delivering timely possessions or refunds in accordance with the authorities' decisions. The verdicts generally pointed toward a need for Supria Sales to rectify its business practices, ensuring transparency in transactions and reliability in fulfilling contractual obligations.