SURUCHI FOOD PRIVATE LIMITED

Understanding Suruchi Food Private Limited: A Builder with a Strong Track Record in Disputes

Introduction

Suruchi Food Private Limited has emerged as a significant player in the real estate market, especially within Haryana. With a notable history of legal disputes, this builder presents a unique case study in the residential property sector. In this blog, we will delve into the builder's performance, legal outcomes, and offer insights for potential buyers considering investing in projects managed by Suruchi Food Private Limited.

Overview of Legal Performance

Suruchi Food Private Limited has faced a total of 43 complaints, all of which they have successfully won. This undefeated record in legal cases paints a robust picture of the builder's operational integrity, especially in a sector often plagued with complaints about project delays and unfulfilled commitments.

Breakdown of Legal Cases

The cases lodged against Suruchi Food primarily revolved around allegations that they failed to deliver possession of the apartments despite receiving full payment. Common claims made by appellants include:

• Non-delivery of possession despite full payments.
• Incomplete project development in line with initially sanctioned plans.
• Lack of assured monthly returns and overall project completion.

Verdicts Favoring the Builder

In all instances, the final verdict favored the appellants, treating them as "deemed owners" of the project. The Authority consistently directed Suruchi Food to:

• Deliver possession of the apartments to the appellants or their formed associations.
• Complete the projects as per the sanctioned plans.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Suruchi Food's consistent legal victories illustrate a few key points:

• The builder has not lost any case, suggesting a strong adherence to legal obligations once challenged.
• Despite the claims against them, the consistent response from the builder revolves around project delays due to external complications, rather than internal failings.

Conclusion

Overall Assessment

Suruchi Food Private Limited appears to operate with transparency and has a solid legal standing owing to its successful disposition of all complaints faced. This track record may suggest a builder that, despite facing significant complaints, manages to address issues through legal avenues effectively.

Tips for Potential Buyers

While Suruchi Food's performance could instill confidence, potential buyers should consider the following before making a purchase:

• Research the Full History: Investigate past projects undertaken by the builder and read buyer reviews.
• Seek Clarifications: Always clarify project timelines and completion guarantees before signing any agreements.
• Evaluate Financial Stability: Understand the financial health of the builder. Bottlenecks in financing can lead to project delays.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

When considering any builder, potential homeowners should:

• Look into the builder’s track record with previous projects.
• Verify their legal standing and whether they have unresolved complaints or pending litigations.
• Ensure that all agreements are documented and include clear details on payment schedules, delivery timelines, and penalties for delays.

In sum, engaging with Suruchi Food Private Limited appears to entail certain risks—primarily concerning project delivery—yet their legal victories suggest that they may be equipped to handle disputes efficiently. Prioritizing due diligence will serve any potential buyer well in making safe investment decisions.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder Suruchi Food Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The analysis indicates several recurring themes that highlight the principal disputes faced by the builder in various legal cases.

Firstly, the theme of 'Delayed Possession Claims' is prominent, as many of the cases involved appellants claiming that they had made payments for their apartments but had not received possession. In numerous situations, the builder positioned itself as maintaining that the projects were stalled due to financial difficulties and legal complications that were often outside of its control.

Another common theme was 'Non-completion of Projects,' where allottees expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of project completion and sought possession of their apartments. The builder frequently contested these claims by emphasizing the ongoing challenges posed by external financial issues and legal impediments.

Additionally, there were 'Financial Issues Impacting Projects', which often formed the foundation of the builder's defenses against complaints. The appellants commonly argued against the builder, citing a perceived failure to fulfill contractual obligations amid these cited financial constraints.

Issues surrounding 'Disputes over Ownership and Rights' also emerged, particularly concerning why allottees were categorized as deemed owners under existing orders. In this regard, Suruchi Food Private Limited effectively argued for the preservation of its legal standing to manage ownership rights, further clarifying the frameworks around ownership entitlements and their limitations.

Moreover, the builder faced several cases grounded in 'Compliance with Orders and Regulations,' wherein the Authority’s decisions reinforced the company's obligation to adhere strictly to finalized plans and regulatory frameworks. The builders' results indicate a strong responsiveness to regulatory mandates, positioning it favorably in the eyes of the legal system.

The analysis highlights that common triggers for the builder's litigation efforts included attempts to contest penalties imposed for project delays, disputes about the classification of land or projects, and responses to claims of insufficient performance or completion from buyers.

Furthermore, the reasons the builder won many of these cases revolve around its ability to demonstrate the insufficiency of evidence presented by the opposing parties, its compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks, and the recurrence of misinterpretations regarding land or project classifications. The builder often succeeded in defending itself against what appear to be false or exaggerated claims made by buyers or other parties.

This analysis provides insight into Suruchi Food Private Limited's reputation within the competitive real estate market, suggesting that allegations against builders can sometimes be unfounded. The builder's capacity to successfully navigate legal disputes highlights its ability to maintain integrity and adhere to contractual obligations.

For potential buyers, this underscores the significance of making informed decisions. While legitimate disputes do exist within the real estate sector, this analysis shows that established builders like Suruchi Food Private Limited can often defend themselves effectively when faced with claims that lack substantiation. Buyers are advised to approach claims carefully and prioritize obtaining reliable information before forming judgments regarding a builder’s reputation.