| CIN | U70100CH2005PLC028728 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | B-107, Business Complex at Elante Mall, First Floor, Industrial Area, Phase-1 Chandigarh Chandigarh CH 160001 IN |
| Company Status | Public |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the ever-evolving real estate market, choosing the right builder can significantly impact one’s investment. Sushma Buildtech Limited, a builder with projects primarily in Punjab, has encountered numerous legal challenges, with a total of 146 complaints lodged against them. This blog post delves into the outcomes of these cases to provide potential buyers with essential insights.
Overview of Legal Challenges
Sushma Buildtech Limited faces a staggering number of complaints, with 118 cases won and 28 cases lost. These numbers outline a complex landscape of disputes, primarily revolving around delays in delivering possession and fulfillment of contractual obligations.
Patterns in Lost Cases
The cases where Sushma Buildtech Limited lost reveal several key patterns:
- Delayed Possession Claims: Many complainants sought compensation specifically for delayed delivery of possession. In multiple cases, the builder claimed that the pandemic impacted their operations, suggesting a trend of addressing external factors to defend their position.
- Settlement Withdrawals: Numerous complaints were dismissed as withdrawn, often indicating either a negotiated settlement or the complainant's satisfaction with partial payments.
- Failure to Fulfilling Obligations: A recurring theme was the claim that the builder failed to meet their obligations under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA), leading to complaints centered around inadequate delivery and unmet expectations.
Patterns in Won Cases
Conversely, the patterns in cases won by Sushma Buildtech Limited showcase aspects of their legal strategy:
- Defensive Claims on Fulfillment: Several cases hinged on the builder arguing that they had met the obligations set forth in contracts, often leading the courts to side with them.
- Successful Jurisdictional Challenges: The builder successfully argued instances where the Adjudicating Officer lacked jurisdiction over the relief sought by the complainants, showcasing a keen understanding of legal frameworks.
- Counterclaims of Default: In multiple instances, the builder argued that the complainants were themselves in default of payment terms, which served to absolve the builder from liability in cases of delayed possession.
Conclusion
Based on the data analyzed, Sushma Buildtech Limited exhibits a mixed track record in handling legal disputes, primarily regarding possession and contractual obligations. With a high number of complaints and a greater number of losses, potential buyers should exercise due diligence when considering investments in projects by this builder.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Thorough Research: Before investment, investigate the builder's track record concerning project deliveries and legal issues. Look for customer reviews and previous case outcomes.
- Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with your rights under RERA. This knowledge can empower you in case of disputes regarding possession or contractual obligations.
- Document Everything: Keep records of all communications, agreements, and payments. Documentation will be crucial in any potential legal issue.
General Tips for Choosing a Builder
- Check Registration and Reviews: Always verify if the builder is registered with RERA and check online reviews to gauge customer satisfaction.
- Review Past Projects: Inspect previously completed projects by the builder to assess quality and timely execution.
- Seek Professional Advice: Consider consulting a legal professional or real estate advisor to guide you through contract terms and conditions.
In summary, while Sushma Buildtech Limited has successfully defended itself in a considerable number of cases, the overall figure of 146 complaints and a significant loss ratio should raise caution among potential buyers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. Includes summaries and key takeaways.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims
Refund and Compensation Disputes
Non-Compliance with Agreements
Penalties for Project Delays
Possession Delivery Issues
Interest Payment Delays
Analysis of the cases filed against Sushma Buildtech Limited, where the builder lost, reveals a multitude of challenges faced by homebuyers and commercial unit purchasers. The cases highlight several recurring themes, showcasing an uneasy relationship between the builder and its clients.
The predominant theme among these cases is Delayed Possession Claims. Numerous complainants cited significant delays in the delivery of residential flats and commercial units. They often sought refunds, compensation for the delays, and interest on their investments. The builder consistently attributed these delays to unforeseen circumstances and attempted to justify possession offers made at later stages. However, the verdicts generally favored the complainants, indicating a systemic issue with the builder's project management and timelines.
Refund and Compensation Disputes also stand out, with many buyers questioning the builder's adherence to their agreements. Buyers sought refunds due to the builder's failure to provide promised amenities, timely possession, or adherence to agreed-upon specifications. The builder's claims of having fulfilled obligations were often met with skepticism by the adjudicating bodies, which further highlights the communication gap and trust issues between the parties involved.
Non-Compliance with Agreements emerges as another critical theme. Buyers accused the builder of deviating from accepted terms, leading to disputes over payment schedules and project features. The builder's defense often revolved around the customers’ payment defaults and their failure to accept possession, illustrating a pattern where both parties blamed each other for contractual discrepancies.
Penalties for Project Delays and Possession Delivery Issues are intertwined with the aforementioned themes. Buyers reported not only financial distress due to delayed refunds or compensation but also emotional strain from prolonged waits for their properties. The builder faced several penalties for failing to meet regulatory requirements and timelines, cementing the idea that they struggled with operational efficiency and compliance.
Interest Payment Delays rounds out the key themes, as buyers frequently sought interest compensation for the delayed possession of their properties. This reflects another layer of dissatisfaction, where buyers felt that the builder had not only failed to deliver on promises of timely possession but also did not provide adequate financial recompense for their patience.
In conclusion, the cases against Sushma Buildtech Limited illustrate a pattern of operational inefficiencies, contractual disputes, and failures to meet customer expectations. Buyers were primarily motivated to take legal action due to delayed possession, insufficient communication regarding project timelines, and financial grievances related to refunds and interest compensation. The builder's recurrent losses in these cases underline the importance of transparency, adherence to agreements, and timely project delivery in the real estate sector.
This table provides details of individual cases contributing to the summary above. Click rows to expand content. Use "Show More/Less" buttons below.
| Case No. | State | Summary | Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant | Respondent | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misc. Ref. No. 11 o…Misc. Ref. No. 11 of 2018 | PunjabPunjab | Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Punjab imposed …Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Punjab imposed a penalty of Rs 100,000 on Sushma Buildtech Limited for violating Section 11(2) of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority Act 2016 by not displaying the registration number in advertisements. | ["Real Estate Regul…["Real Estate Regulation", "Advertisement"] | {"appellant_claim": "The Real Estate Regulatory A…{"appellant_claim": "The Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Punjab claimed that Sushma Buildtech Limited had violated Section 11(2) of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority Act 2016 by not displaying the registration number in advertisements.", "respondent_claim": "Sushma Buildtech Limited claimed that the lapse was accidental and assured that there would not be further violation in this regard.", "final_verdict": "The Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Punjab imposed a penalty of Rs 100,000 on Sushma Buildtech Limited.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Real Estate Regulat…Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Punjab | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA '04.T1.2019RERA '04.T1.2019 | Not providedNot provided | Complainant withdrew the complaint after reaching…Complainant withdrew the complaint after reaching an agreement with the respondent. The respondent agreed to provide the occupancy certificate. | Withdrawn complaintWithdrawn complaint | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that they had reached an agreement with the respondent and wanted the complaint to be withdrawn.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent agreed to provide the occupancy certificate to the complainant.", "final_verdict": "The complaint was disposed of as withdrawn.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Raka ChimniRaka Chimni | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC 1417 of 2019GC 1417 of 2019 | PunjabPunjab | The complainant, Daljeet Kaur Gill, filed a compl…The complainant, Daljeet Kaur Gill, filed a complaint against M/s Sushma Buildtech Limited for delay in handing over possession of two commercial units. The Authority directed the respondent to hand over possession and pay interest for the delay. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest payment"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that the respondent had delayed handing over possession of the two commercial units and sought continuation of 'assured returns' promised by the respondent.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the project had been completed and the Completion Certificate had been issued by the Competent Authority.", "final_verdict": "The Authority directed the respondent to hand over possession of the units by 15.09.2020 and pay interest for the delay starting from 30.08.2017 and 06.11.2017 respectively.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Daljeet Kaur GillDaljeet Kaur Gill | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC 1193 of 2019GC 1193 of 2019 | PunjabPunjab | Complainant sought possession of apartment and in…Complainant sought possession of apartment and interest for delay. Authority ordered payment of interest at prescribed rate from 12.12.2017 till actual delivery of possession. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest payment"] | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant sought possessio…{"appellant_claim": "Complainant sought possession of apartment and interest for delay.", "respondent_claim": "Respondents claimed that complainant was bound by terms of Apartment Buyer's Agreement, which provided for fixed compensation for delay.", "final_verdict": "Authority ordered payment of interest at prescribed rate from 12.12.2017 till actual delivery of possession.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Parvesh BansalParvesh Bansal | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC 1413 of 2019GC 1413 of 2019 | PunjabPunjab | The complainants, Monica Bakhru and Suresh Bakhru…The complainants, Monica Bakhru and Suresh Bakhru, filed a complaint against M/s Sushma Buildtech Limited for delay in delivery of possession of an apartment. The Authority directed the respondent to pay interest for the period of delay. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest payment"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed that the respondent delayed the delivery of possession of the apartment beyond the stipulated period of 42 months.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the complainants had accepted possession of the apartment and had furnished an affidavit stating that they were satisfied with the apartment.", "final_verdict": "The Authority directed the respondent to pay interest at the rate prescribed in Rule 16 of the Punjab State Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017 to the complainants for the period 05.07.2018 to 18.06.2019.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Suresh BakhruSuresh Bakhru | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/GC No.1408 of …RERA/GC No.1408 of 2019 | PunjabPunjab | Complaint withdrawn by the complainant. Case dism…Complaint withdrawn by the complainant. Case dismissed as withdrawn. | ["Withdrawal of com…["Withdrawal of complaint"] | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c…{"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "Complaint withdrawn and case dismissed as withdrawn.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Gagandeep SawhneyGagandeep Sawhney | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC 1231 of 2019GC 1231 of 2019 | PunjabPunjab | Complainants sought redressal for delay in delive…Complainants sought redressal for delay in delivery of possession of a residential flat. The Real Estate Regulatory Authority directed the respondent to pay interest for the period of delay. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest payment"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed that the respondent had delayed delivery of possession of the residential flat and sought redressal for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the complainants were not entitled to any relief as the agreement was not in the prescribed format and the complaint was premature.", "final_verdict": "The Real Estate Regulatory Authority directed the respondent to pay interest at the rate of 9.3% from 14.03.2018 to 18.01.2020.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Reedhu JaiswalReedhu Jaiswal | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC 1411 of 2019GC 1411 of 2019 | PunjabPunjab | Complaint for delay in delivery of possession of …Complaint for delay in delivery of possession of residential flat. Directed to pay interest at the rate of 9.3% from 18.04.2016 till 20.07.2019. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest payment"] | {"appellant_claim": "Delay in delivery of possess…{"appellant_claim": "Delay in delivery of possession of residential flat and refund of GST charged.", "respondent_claim": "Compensation for delay was paid as per the terms of the Agreement.", "final_verdict": "Directed to pay interest at the rate of 9.3% from 18.04.2016 till 20.07.2019.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Kanshi RamKanshi Ram | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC 1291 of 2019GC 1291 of 2019 | PunjabPunjab | Complainants sought early delivery of possession …Complainants sought early delivery of possession and interest for delay in a residential project. Authority directed payment of interest at 9.3% p.a. from 28.08.2017 till actual delivery. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest payment"] | {"appellant_claim": "Early delivery of possession…{"appellant_claim": "Early delivery of possession and interest for delay in a residential project.", "respondent_claim": "Payment of compensation as per agreement terms, lack of jurisdiction for interest payment.", "final_verdict": "Payment of interest at 9.3% p.a. from 28.08.2017 till actual delivery.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Rajneeta Radhika Ka…Rajneeta Radhika Karan | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC 1288 of 2019GC 1288 of 2019 | PunjabPunjab | The complainants sought redressal for the delay i…The complainants sought redressal for the delay in delivery of possession of a commercial unit purchased from the respondent. The respondent was directed to pay interest for the period of delay. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest payment"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed that the respondent had delayed the delivery of possession of the commercial unit and sought redressal.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the possession had been offered to the complainants on 02.04.2018 and that the complainants had been paid 'assured return' for the period of delay.", "final_verdict": "The respondent was directed to pay interest for the period of delay from 25.09.2018 till actual delivery of possession.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Shaifali GoyalShaifali Goyal | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERAGC No.1380 of 2…RERAGC No.1380 of 2019 | PunjabPunjab | Complaint filed by Jagvijay Gill against Sushma B…Complaint filed by Jagvijay Gill against Sushma Buildtech Ltd for not accepting his offer. The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. | ["Complaint dismiss…["Complaint dismissal"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t…{"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that the respondent did not accept his offer.", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Jagvijay GillJagvijay Gill | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/GC No.1781/2020RERA/GC No.1781/2020 | PunjabPunjab | Complainants Rohit Juneja and Neerja Juneja withd…Complainants Rohit Juneja and Neerja Juneja withdrew their complaint against Sushma Buildtech Limited, citing an amicable resolution of the issue. | ["Withdrawn complai…["Withdrawn complaint"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants alleged iss…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants alleged issues with the respondent, but later stated that the matter had been resolved amicably.", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Neerja JunejaNeerja Juneja | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/GC No.1771/2020RERA/GC No.1771/2020 | PunjabPunjab | Complaint withdrawn by complainant after amicable…Complaint withdrawn by complainant after amicable resolution with respondent. Case dismissed as withdrawn. | ["Withdrawn complai…["Withdrawn complaint"] | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c…{"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "Case dismissed as withdrawn", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Vivek KumarVivek Kumar | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| AdCNol731/2020/TR-A…AdCNol731/2020/TR-AUTH/0111/2020 | PunjabPunjab | Dipesh Gupta filed a complaint against Sushma Bui…Dipesh Gupta filed a complaint against Sushma Buildtech Limited, but later withdrew the complaint after an amicable settlement. The complaint was allowed to be withdrawn, and the file was consigned to the record room. | ["Withdrawal of com…["Withdrawal of complaint"] | {"appellant_claim": "Dipesh Gupta claimed that he…{"appellant_claim": "Dipesh Gupta claimed that he had a dispute with Sushma Buildtech Limited, but later withdrew the complaint after an amicable settlement.", "respondent_claim": "Sushma Buildtech Limited did not make any claims in this case.", "final_verdict": "The complaint was allowed to be withdrawn, and the file was consigned to the record room.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Dipesh GuptaDipesh Gupta | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| AdCNol732/2020/TR-A…AdCNol732/2020/TR-AUTH/0112/2020 | PunjabPunjab | The complainant, Dr. Suruchi Abrol, filed a compl…The complainant, Dr. Suruchi Abrol, filed a complaint against M/s. Sushma Buildtech Limited, but later withdrew the complaint after an amicable settlement between the parties. | ["Withdrawal of com…["Withdrawal of complaint"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant alleged issu…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant alleged issues with the respondent, but later withdrew the complaint after an amicable settlement.", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "The complaint was allowed to be withdrawn after the parties reached an amicable settlement.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Suruchi AbrolSuruchi Abrol | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC No.1399/2019GC No.1399/2019 | PunjabPunjab | Complainant sought possession of flat and interes…Complainant sought possession of flat and interest for delay. Authority ordered payment of interest from 25.04.2017 to 01.02.2020 at SBI's highest marginal cost of lending rate plus 2%. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest payment"] | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant sought possessio…{"appellant_claim": "Complainant sought possession of flat and interest for delay.", "respondent_claim": "Respondent claimed that complainant was not entitled to interest as per the agreement.", "final_verdict": "Authority ordered payment of interest from 25.04.2017 to 01.02.2020 at SBI's highest marginal cost of lending rate plus 2%.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Baljinder KaurBaljinder Kaur | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC1517/2020GC1517/2020 | PunjabPunjab | The complainant, Vybhav Sood, filed a complaint a…The complainant, Vybhav Sood, filed a complaint against Sushma Buildtech Limited for delay in possession of a unit in the project 'Sushma Chandigarh Grande'. The Authority directed the respondent to pay interest at the rate of 9.30% per annum for the delay. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest payment"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that the respondent had delayed possession of the unit and sought compensation of Rs.20.00 lakhs.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the project was under construction and that the complainant had delayed payment of due instalments.", "final_verdict": "The Authority directed the respondent to pay interest at the rate of 9.30% per annum for the delay.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Vybhav SoodVybhav Sood | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC No.1485/2019GC No.1485/2019 | PunjabPunjab | Complaint against Sushma Buildtech Limited for de…Complaint against Sushma Buildtech Limited for delay in possession of flat and various facilities. Case partly accepted and directions given for handing over possession and payment of interest. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Non-provision of facilities"] | {"appellant_claim": "Delay in possession of flat …{"appellant_claim": "Delay in possession of flat and non-provision of various facilities like swimming pool, club house, etc.", "respondent_claim": "Possession offered after obtaining Completion Certificate, cancellation of allotment due to non-payment of dues, and payment of pre-EMI interest.", "final_verdict": "Cancellation of allotment set aside, directions for handing over possession within 1 month, and payment of interest at 9.30% from 06.05.2016 to 13.08.2019.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Shivani GuptaShivani Gupta | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERAIGC No. 0024/20…RERAIGC No. 0024/2021 | PunjabPunjab | Complaint withdrawn by parties due to compromise.…Complaint withdrawn by parties due to compromise. Case dismissed as withdrawn. | Withdrawn complaintWithdrawn complaint | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c…{"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "Case dismissed as withdrawn due to compromise between parties.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Gaurav VermaGaurav Verma | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERAYGC No.1780/2020RERAYGC No.1780/2020 | PunjabPunjab | Complainant sought interest for delayed possessio…Complainant sought interest for delayed possession of apartment. Authority partly accepted complaint, ordering respondent to pay interest @ 9.30% per annum for delay in handing over possession. | ["Delayed possessio…["Delayed possession", "Interest payment"] | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant sought interest …{"appellant_claim": "Complainant sought interest for delayed possession of apartment.", "respondent_claim": "Respondent justified delay due to COVID-19 epidemic and subsequent lockdown.", "final_verdict": "Authority partly accepted complaint, ordering respondent to pay interest @ 9.30% per annum for delay in handing over possession.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Parveen DhingraParveen Dhingra | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC0023/2021GC0023/2021 | PunjabPunjab | Complaint against delay in delivery of possession…Complaint against delay in delivery of possession of a unit in the project Sushma Chandigarh Infinium. Case disposed off with direction to execute Conveyance Deed upon payment of dues. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Conveyance Deed"] | {"appellant_claim": "Delay in delivery of valid p…{"appellant_claim": "Delay in delivery of valid possession of the unit", "respondent_claim": "No hitch in executing Conveyance Deed once dues are paid", "final_verdict": "Direction to execute Conveyance Deed upon payment of dues", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Manju SharmaManju Sharma | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| 1845202018452020 | PunjabPunjab | The complainant filed a complaint against the res…The complainant filed a complaint against the respondent for delayed possession of a residential apartment. The authority partly accepted the complaint and directed the respondent to pay interest for the delayed period. | ["Delayed possessio…["Delayed possession", "Interest payment"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that the respondent delayed the possession of the residential apartment and sought interest for the delayed period.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the possession was offered on 13.06.2019 and the complainant delayed taking physical possession.", "final_verdict": "The authority partly accepted the complaint and directed the respondent to pay interest for the delayed period.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Manohar Lal SachdevaManohar Lal Sachdeva | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| ADC No.( 109/2021 S…ADC No.( 109/2021 SPL) | PunjabPunjab | Complaint for refund and interest for delayed pos…Complaint for refund and interest for delayed possession of a residential apartment. The respondents are directed to refund the amount with interest. | ["Refund for delaye…["Refund for delayed possession"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants sought refu…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants sought refund and interest for delayed possession of their residential apartment.", "respondent_claim": "The respondents claimed that possession was offered within the agreed-upon time frame and that the complainants were not entitled to refund.", "final_verdict": "The respondents are directed to refund the amount of Rs.76,29,751/- to the complainants, along with interest as per State Bank of India's highest marginal cost of lending rate (as of today) plus 2%/.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Ashima SoodAshima Sood | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| ADC No.0009/2021 SP…ADC No.0009/2021 SPLTO003 of 2021 | PunjabPunjab | The complainants sought refund and interest for a…The complainants sought refund and interest for a delayed apartment, and the authority ordered the respondents to refund the amount with interest. | ["Delayed apartment…["Delayed apartment", "Refund"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants sought refu…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants sought refund and interest for a delayed apartment.", "respondent_claim": "The respondents claimed that possession was offered after obtaining completion/occupancy certificate and that the complainants cannot ask for refund once a valid offer of possession has been made.", "final_verdict": "The authority ordered the respondents to refund the amount with interest.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Ashima SoodAshima Sood | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| 0156 of 2021 BF-TR0156 of 2021 BF-TR | PunjabPunjab | Complaint withdrawn by complainant, case dismisse…Complaint withdrawn by complainant, case dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh complaint. | ["Withdrawn complai…["Withdrawn complaint"] | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c…{"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "Complaint withdrawn, case dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh complaint.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Mansa Ram AhujaMansa Ram Ahuja | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC 0317 of 2021GC 0317 of 2021 | PunjabPunjab | The complainants, Swaraj Bhushan Lalit and Vanita…The complainants, Swaraj Bhushan Lalit and Vanita Lalit, filed a complaint against Sushma Buildtech Limited for delay in delivery of possession of an apartment. The Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Punjab, directed the respondent to pay interest for the delay and the complainants to take possession of the apartment within 2 months. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest for delay"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed that the respondent delayed the delivery of possession of the apartment and sought a direction to the respondent to hand over possession of the apartment complete in all respects and payment of interest for the period of delay.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that possession had already been offered to the complainants and it was they who were in default for not depositing the balance amount due and taking possession of the apartment.", "final_verdict": "The Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Punjab, directed the respondent to pay interest at the prescribed rate with effect from 16.7.2017 till 12.1.2021 and the complainants to take possession of the apartment within 2 months of the order by clearing the balance amount due.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Vanita LalitVanita Lalit | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC No.0025/2021BFGC No.0025/2021BF | PunjabPunjab | Complainants sought refund for non-delivery of po…Complainants sought refund for non-delivery of possession of a flat. Authority directed refund with interest for the amount paid. | ["Refund for non-de…["Refund for non-delivery of possession"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed ref…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed refund for the amount paid for a flat that was not delivered within the stipulated period.", "respondent_claim": "The respondents claimed that the complainants had not paid the due instalments and that possession would be given soon after receiving the partial completion certificate.", "final_verdict": "The Authority directed the respondents to refund the amount paid by the complainants with interest.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Neelam GuptaNeelam Gupta | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| ADC No.1309/2019 SP…ADC No.1309/2019 SPLTOOO7 of 2021 | PunjabPunjab | The complainant sought refund for a flat not deli…The complainant sought refund for a flat not delivered by the respondent. The authority ordered the respondent to refund the amount with interest. | ["Refund for undeli…["Refund for undelivered flat"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant sought refun…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant sought refund for a flat not delivered by the respondent.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the flat was nearing completion and possession would be delivered within three to four months.", "final_verdict": "The authority ordered the respondent to refund the amount with interest.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Anurag JainAnurag Jain | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC No.0347/2021GC No.0347/2021 | PunjabPunjab | Complaint filed for interest on delayed possessio…Complaint filed for interest on delayed possession of residential flat. Authority directed payment of interest and possession of covered car parking. | ["Delayed possessio…["Delayed possession", "Interest payment"] | {"appellant_claim": "Interest on delayed possessi…{"appellant_claim": "Interest on delayed possession of residential flat", "respondent_claim": "Settlement agreement with compensation payment", "final_verdict": "Authority directed payment of interest and possession of covered car parking", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Salma RaniSalma Rani | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC No.0349/2021GC No.0349/2021 | PunjabPunjab | Complainants sought possession of apartment and c…Complainants sought possession of apartment and compensation for delayed possession. Authority directed respondent to pay interest and complainants to take possession after paying remaining amount. | ["Delayed Possessio…["Delayed Possession", "Compensation"] | {"appellant_claim": "Complainants claimed possess…{"appellant_claim": "Complainants claimed possession of apartment was delayed and sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "Respondent claimed that possession was given within the stipulated time frame and sought to dismiss the complaint.", "final_verdict": "Authority directed respondent to pay interest to complainants and complainants to take possession after paying remaining amount.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Sudha BhattiSudha Bhatti | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC No.0353/2021GC No.0353/2021 | PunjabPunjab | Complainants sought possession of apartment and c…Complainants sought possession of apartment and compensation for delayed possession. Authority directed respondent to pay interest for delayed possession. | ["Delayed Possessio…["Delayed Possession", "Compensation"] | {"appellant_claim": "Complainants claimed that re…{"appellant_claim": "Complainants claimed that respondent failed to deliver possession within stipulated period and paid compensation. They sought possession after obtaining occupancy certificate and compensation for delay.", "respondent_claim": "Respondent claimed that possession was offered within time frame allowed as per RERA Registration and compensation was paid. They argued that settlement agreement debars complainants from claiming further compensation.", "final_verdict": "Authority directed respondent to pay interest for delayed possession from 01.11.2020 till date of order and till possession is handed over after obtaining completion certificate.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Salma RaniSalma Rani | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC No.1490 of 2019B…GC No.1490 of 2019BFTR | PunjabPunjab | Complainant sought refund for unpaid flat booking…Complainant sought refund for unpaid flat booking. Authority ordered refund with interest after finding excessive forfeiture. | ["Flat booking refu…["Flat booking refund", "Forfeiture"] | {"appellant_claim": "Refund of Rs.13,89,700/- wit…{"appellant_claim": "Refund of Rs.13,89,700/- with interest for unpaid flat booking.", "respondent_claim": "Cancellation of booking due to non-payment of instalments and forfeiture of excess amount.", "final_verdict": "Refund of Rs.7,29,700/- with interest from 06.02.2019 till payment.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Tarlochan SinghTarlochan Singh | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| AdC No. 0128 of 2021AdC No. 0128 of 2021 | PunjabPunjab | The complainants, Brig. Devinder Singh and Smt. B…The complainants, Brig. Devinder Singh and Smt. Baljeet Kaur, filed a complaint against Sushma Buildtech Limited and Binder Pal Mittal for delay in possession of a commercial unit and sought refund of their deposited amount along with interest. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Refund of deposited amount"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed that the respondents delayed the possession of the commercial unit and sought refund of their deposited amount along with interest.", "respondent_claim": "The respondents claimed that the delay in possession was due to unforeseen circumstances and that the complainants had not paid the remaining dues on time.", "final_verdict": "The Authority held that the respondents were liable to pay interest to the complainants for the delayed period of possession and ordered the respondents to pay an amount of Rs.9,13,910/- to the complainants.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Smt. Baljeet KaurSmt. Baljeet Kaur | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| ADC No.1637/2020BFTRADC No.1637/2020BFTR | PunjabPunjab | Complainants sought refund for delayed possession…Complainants sought refund for delayed possession of residential apartments. Authority directed refund with interest, following Supreme Court guidelines. | ["Refund for delaye…["Refund for delayed possession"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant sought refun…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant sought refund for the delayed possession of the residential apartment, along with interest and compensation.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that possession was offered in 2020 and the complainant failed to take possession.", "final_verdict": "The Authority directed the respondent to refund the amount paid by the complainant, along with interest at the rate of State Bank of India's highest marginal cost of lending rate (as of today) plus 2%.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Manoj GautamManoj Gautam | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| PBRERA-SAS79-PRO0085PBRERA-SAS79-PRO0085 | PunjabPunjab | The complainant, Manjit Singh Chimni, withdrew hi…The complainant, Manjit Singh Chimni, withdrew his complaint for compensation in form-N, seeking possession and interest for the delayed period in delivery of possession. The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action at a later stage. | ["Delayed possessio…["Delayed possession", "Compensation"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant sought compe…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant sought compensation for the delayed period in delivery of possession and sought possession of the flat.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent, Sushma Buildtech Ltd., did not make any claims in the complaint.", "final_verdict": "The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action at a later stage.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Manjit Singh ChimniManjit Singh Chimni | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| AdC No.1340/2019AdC No.1340/2019 | PunjabPunjab | The complainants sought refund of the amount paid…The complainants sought refund of the amount paid by them as the respondent failed to deliver possession of the respective shop-cum-offices booked by them. The respondent was liable to refund the amount paid by the complainants along with interest. | ["Refund of amount …["Refund of amount paid", "Non-delivery of possession"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed that the respondent failed to deliver possession of the shop-cum-offices booked by them and sought refund of the amount paid.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the complainants had not paid the due amount and had not obtained possession of the units.", "final_verdict": "The respondent was liable to refund the amount paid by the complainants along with interest.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Satinder LambaSatinder Lamba | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| ADC 1076/2019ADC 1076/2019 | PunjabPunjab | The complainant, Sameer Madan, filed a complaint …The complainant, Sameer Madan, filed a complaint against Sushma Buildtech Ltd for delay in handing over possession of a unit in the project Sushma Chandigarh Grande. The Adjudicating Officer ordered the respondent to return the amount paid by the complainant with interest and compensation for mental agony and litigation expenses. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Refund with interest"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that the respondent failed to deliver possession of the unit within the stipulated period and sought refund of the amount paid with interest and compensation for mental agony and litigation expenses.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the complainant was a defaulter in making payments and that the agreement was not in accordance with the provisions of the RERA Act.", "final_verdict": "The Adjudicating Officer ordered the respondent to return the amount paid by the complainant with interest and compensation for mental agony and litigation expenses.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Sameer MadanSameer Madan | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| AdC 1321/2019AdC 1321/2019 | PunjabPunjab | Complainant sought refund and interest for a flat…Complainant sought refund and interest for a flat booked in a project that did not provide completion certificate and demanded excess payment without a buyer's agreement. Adjudicating Officer ordered refund, interest, and compensation for mental agony and litigation expenses. | ["Refund for excess…["Refund for excess payment", "Lack of completion certificate"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed refu…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed refund and interest for a flat booked in a project that did not provide completion certificate and demanded excess payment without a buyer's agreement.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the complaint was not maintainable, that no cause of action had arisen to the complainant, and that the project was completed and partial completion certificate was issued.", "final_verdict": "The Adjudicating Officer ordered refund of Rs. 33,00,000, simple interest at the SBI highest marginal cost of lending rate plus 2% on the principal amount from the date of respective payments till realization, and compensation of Rs. 50,000 for mental agony and litigation expenses.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Narinder RanaNarinder Rana | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| AdC No. 1628/2020AdC No. 1628/2020 | PunjabPunjab | Complaint dismissed as compromised after parties …Complaint dismissed as compromised after parties entered into agreement. Complainant received cheques in satisfaction of claim. | ["Compromise Agreem…["Compromise Agreement"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant, Ankit Gupta…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant, Ankit Gupta, claimed compensation against M/s Sushma Buildtech Limited.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent, M/s Sushma Buildtech Limited, did not provide a claim.", "final_verdict": "The complaint was dismissed as compromised after the parties entered into an agreement. The complainant received cheques in satisfaction of his claim.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Ankit GuptaAnkit Gupta | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/AdCNo. 0035 OF…RERA/AdCNo. 0035 OF 2022 | Not providedNot provided | Complaint dismissed as withdrawn due to duplicate…Complaint dismissed as withdrawn due to duplicate filing. Case was wrongly filed and a similar complaint was already pending. | ["Duplicate filing"]["Duplicate filing"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t…{"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that the complaint was wrongly filed and a similar complaint was already pending.", "respondent_claim": "Not applicable as the respondent did not make any claims.", "final_verdict": "The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn due to duplicate filing.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Mansa Ram AhujaMansa Ram Ahuja | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/ AdCNo 0156 OF…RERA/ AdCNo 0156 OF 2021 | Not providedNot provided | The complainant withdrew the complaint with permi…The complainant withdrew the complaint with permission to file a fresh complaint after furnishing further particulars. | ["Complaint withdra…["Complaint withdrawal"] | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c…{"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn with permission to file a fresh complaint after furnishing further particulars.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Sh. Mansa Ram AhujaSh. Mansa Ram Ahuja | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| AdC No. 0009/2021AdC No. 0009/2021 | PunjabPunjab | The complainants sought compensation for delay in…The complainants sought compensation for delay in possession of a flat and harassment by the respondent. The adjudicating officer partly allowed the complaint and directed the respondent to pay compensation for mental agony and litigation expenses. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Harassment"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed that the respondent delayed possession of the flat and harassed them by not providing a proper completion certificate and occupancy certificate.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and that they had provided all necessary documents.", "final_verdict": "The adjudicating officer partly allowed the complaint and directed the respondent to pay compensation for mental agony and litigation expenses.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Erchit SoodErchit Sood | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| AdC no. 1261/2019AdC no. 1261/2019 | PunjabPunjab | The complainant sought refund of Rs. 30,70,814 pa…The complainant sought refund of Rs. 30,70,814 paid for a flat in the Sushma Infinium project. The Authority held that the respondent failed to offer possession within the agreed upon period and ordered refund of the entire amount paid along with interest. | ["Refund for delaye…["Refund for delayed possession"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant sought refun…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant sought refund of Rs. 30,70,814 paid for a flat in the Sushma Infinium project, along with interest and compensation for delayed possession.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the complainant was a consistent defaulter and had failed to make payments as per the payment plan. They also claimed that the booking was cancelled and the amount was forfeited.", "final_verdict": "The Authority held that the respondent failed to offer possession within the agreed upon period and ordered refund of the entire amount paid along with interest.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Renu Walia (now dec…Renu Walia (now deceased) through her LR Sh Rajesh Jain | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC No.0025/2021GC No.0025/2021 | PunjabPunjab | The complainants, Ajay Gupta and Neelam Gupta, fi…The complainants, Ajay Gupta and Neelam Gupta, filed a complaint against Sushma Buildtech Limited and its directors for delay in possession of a residential apartment. The adjudicating officer held that the respondents were liable for compensation for the delay. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Compensation"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed that the respondents had delayed possession of the residential apartment and sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The respondents claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and that the complainants had also defaulted in making payments.", "final_verdict": "The adjudicating officer held that the respondents were liable for compensation for the delay and awarded a total of Rs. 60,000 to the complainants.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Neelam GuptaNeelam Gupta | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| AdC No.1309/2019AdC No.1309/2019 | PunjabPunjab | Complaint for refund of amount paid by complainan…Complaint for refund of amount paid by complainants to respondents alongwith interest thereon, compensation for mental agony and litigation cost. Complainants entitled to compensation for delay in possession of flat. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession of flat"] | {"appellant_claim": "Refund of amount paid, compe…{"appellant_claim": "Refund of amount paid, compensation for mental agony and litigation cost", "respondent_claim": "Delay in possession of flat due to unforeseen circumstances", "final_verdict": "Complainants entitled to compensation for delay in possession of flat", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Anurag JainAnurag Jain | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/GC No.0410 of …RERA/GC No.0410 of 2022 | Not providedNot provided | The complainant, Shveta Mohindra, entered into a …The complainant, Shveta Mohindra, entered into a written settlement with the respondent, M/s. Sushma Buildtech Ltd., on 29.10.2022, agreeing to receive Rs.10,00,000/- in full and final satisfaction of her claim. | ["Delayed possessio…["Delayed possession"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed comp…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed compensation for delayed possession.", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "The complainant agreed to receive Rs.10,00,000/- in full and final satisfaction of her claim.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Shveta MohindraShveta Mohindra | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/GC No/0318/2021RERA/GC No/0318/2021 | Not providedNot provided | The parties have entered into settlement and seek…The parties have entered into settlement and seek permission to withdraw the present complaint. The dispute has been settled between the parties, and the amount due to the complainant has already been received. | ["Settlement", "Wit…["Settlement", "Withdrawal of complaint"] | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c…{"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "The dispute has been settled between the parties, and the amount due to the complainant has already been received.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Alka MastaAlka Masta | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/ AdCNo 0184 OF…RERA/ AdCNo 0184 OF 2021 | Not providedNot provided | The parties have entered into settlement and seek…The parties have entered into settlement and seek permission to withdraw the present complaint. The matter has been settled between the parties and the complainant does not want to proceed further with the present complaint. | ["Settlement"]["Settlement"] | {"appellant_claim(in detail)": "Not provided", "r…{"appellant_claim(in detail)": "Not provided", "respondent_claim(in detail)": "Not provided", "final_verdict(in detail)": "The matter has been settled between the parties and the complainant does not want to proceed further with the present complaint.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Sumit AerySumit Aery | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/ AdCNo 0095 OF…RERA/ AdCNo 0095 OF 2022 | Not providedNot provided | The complainant seeks permission to withdraw the …The complainant seeks permission to withdraw the complaint after entering into a written settlement with the respondent. The complaint is dismissed as the dispute has been settled between the parties. | ["Settlement", "Wit…["Settlement", "Withdrawal of complaint"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claims that …{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claims that the dispute has been settled between the parties and seeks permission to withdraw the complaint.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent does not have any claim as the dispute has been settled between the parties.", "final_verdict": "The complaint is dismissed as the dispute has been settled between the parties.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Jagmeet Singh KhannaJagmeet Singh Khanna | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/ AdCNo 0094 OF…RERA/ AdCNo 0094 OF 2022 | Not providedNot provided | The complainant seeks permission to withdraw the …The complainant seeks permission to withdraw the complaint after entering into a written settlement with the respondent. The complaint is dismissed as the dispute has been settled between the parties. | ["Settlement", "Wit…["Settlement", "Withdrawal of complaint"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claims that …{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claims that the dispute has been settled between the parties and seeks permission to withdraw the complaint.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent does not have any claim as the dispute has been settled between the parties.", "final_verdict": "The complaint is dismissed as the dispute has been settled between the parties.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Prabjeet SinghPrabjeet Singh | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/AdCNo 0123 OF …RERA/AdCNo 0123 OF 2023 | Not providedNot provided | Complaint dismissed as withdrawn with permission …Complaint dismissed as withdrawn with permission to file a fresh complaint. Fee deposited will be adjusted if a new complaint is filed. | ["Complaint withdra…["Complaint withdrawal"] | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c…{"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "Complaint dismissed as withdrawn", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Mr. Sourabh BhandariMr. Sourabh Bhandari | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| AdC No.1737 of 2020AdC No.1737 of 2020 | PunjabPunjab | Complainants sought refund and compensation for d…Complainants sought refund and compensation for delayed possession of a flat. Adjudicating Officer held the respondent liable for delay and awarded compensation. | ["Delayed possessio…["Delayed possession", "Compensation"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed that the respondent failed to deliver possession of the flat within the stipulated time and sought refund and compensation.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the project was complete and that the complainants had failed to make the balance payment.", "final_verdict": "The Adjudicating Officer held the respondent liable for delay and awarded compensation to the tune of Rs.95,000/-.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Anuja DubeyAnuja Dubey | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| APPEAL No. 201 of 2…APPEAL No. 201 of 2022 | PunjabPunjab | The appellant, Ashok Kumar Chauhan, filed an appe…The appellant, Ashok Kumar Chauhan, filed an appeal against the order of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Punjab, regarding delay in possession of a flat by the respondent, Sushma Buildtech Limited. The appellant claimed that the respondent had failed to provide possession of the flat within the stipulated time and had also charged excess interest. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Excess interest"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t…{"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that the respondent had failed to provide possession of the flat within the stipulated time and had also charged excess interest.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the appellant had failed to pay the dues on time and had also not complied with the terms of the agreement.", "final_verdict": "The respondent was directed to pay interest to the appellant for the delay in possession and the excess interest charged.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Ashok Kumar ChauhanAshok Kumar Chauhan | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| Appeal No. 86 of 20…Appeal No. 86 of 2022 | PunjabPunjab | The appellant sought refund and interest for a de…The appellant sought refund and interest for a delayed real estate project. The tribunal ordered the respondent to return the amount paid with interest. | ["Delayed possessio…["Delayed possession", "Refund and interest"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t…{"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that the respondent delayed possession of the real estate unit and sought refund and interest.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the unit was completed and possession was offered, but the appellant did not accept it.", "final_verdict": "The tribunal ordered the respondent to return the amount paid by the appellant with interest.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Gurpal SinghGurpal Singh | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| Execution Applicati…Execution Application No. 15 of 2022 | PunjabPunjab | The applicants sought execution of an order dated…The applicants sought execution of an order dated 27.09.2022 passed by the Punjab RERA Appellate Tribunal. The matter was disposed of as the learned counsel for the applicant stated that the cheques had been handed over by the non-applicant in satisfaction of the orders passed by the Court. | ["Execution of Orde…["Execution of Order", "Satisfaction of Cheques"] | {"appellant_claim": "The applicants sought execut…{"appellant_claim": "The applicants sought execution of an order dated 27.09.2022 passed by the Punjab RERA Appellate Tribunal.", "respondent_claim": "The respondents claimed that the cheques had been handed over by the non-applicant in satisfaction of the orders passed by the Court.", "final_verdict": "The matter was disposed of as the learned counsel for the applicant stated that the cheques had been handed over by the non-applicant in satisfaction of the orders passed by the Court.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Sneh LataSneh Lata | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| 153 of 2022153 of 2022 | PunjabPunjab | The appellant sought refund for delay in possessi…The appellant sought refund for delay in possession of a real estate unit. The tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to refund and interest for the delay. | ["Real estate refun…["Real estate refund", "Delay in possession"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed refund…{"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed refund for delay in possession of a real estate unit and sought interest for the delay.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the appellant was not entitled to refund as he had not withdrawn from the project before the offer of possession.", "final_verdict": "The tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to refund and interest for the delay.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Sumit AreySumit Arey | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| APPEAL NO. 96 OF 20…APPEAL NO. 96 OF 2022 | PunjabPunjab | The appellant, Om Dutt, filed an appeal against S…The appellant, Om Dutt, filed an appeal against Sushma Buildtech Ltd. for forfeiting the entire amount of Rs.2.5 lacs without a valid agreement. The Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Punjab, accepted the appeal and directed the developer to refund the amount with interest. | ["Forfeiture of dep…["Forfeiture of deposit", "Validity of agreement"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t…{"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that the developer forfeited the entire amount of Rs.2.5 lacs without a valid agreement.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the appellant had signed the application form and clause 8 gave them the right to forfeit 10% of the Basic Sale Price (BSP) and since the amount deposited was less than the contemplated amount, it was forfeited in entirety.", "final_verdict": "The Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Punjab, accepted the appeal and directed the developer to refund the entire amount of Rs.2.5 lacs along with interest at the prescribed statutory rate of interest from the date when this amount was deposited till the date of its realization.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Om DuttOm Dutt | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| APPEAL NO.44 OF 202…APPEAL NO.44 OF 2022 & APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2022 | PunjabPunjab | The appellants claimed relief for delayed possess…The appellants claimed relief for delayed possession of a residential flat and sought statutory interest. The developer claimed that the appellants had received compensation for the delay and that the appellants had given up their claims in an affidavit. | ["Delayed possessio…["Delayed possession", "Statutory interest"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellants claimed that …{"appellant_claim": "The appellants claimed that they had not received possession of the flat within the agreed-upon time and sought statutory interest for the delay.", "respondent_claim": "The developer claimed that the appellants had received compensation for the delay and that the appellants had given up their claims in an affidavit.", "final_verdict": "The tribunal held that the appellants were entitled to statutory interest for the delay, but that the amount of compensation already paid to the appellants would be deducted from the award.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Sneh Lata W/o Kiran…Sneh Lata W/o Kiran Pal Gupta | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| 232 of 2020232 of 2020 | PunjabPunjab | The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn after the a…The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn after the appellant sought permission to withdraw it. | Withdrawal of appealWithdrawal of appeal | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c…{"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Suresh JindalSuresh Jindal | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| Appeal No. 64 of 20…Appeal No. 64 of 2019 | PunjabPunjab | The appellant filed an appeal against the order o…The appellant filed an appeal against the order of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, which had partially accepted her claim and refunded her amount with 10% forfeiture and no interest. The appellate tribunal modified the order, setting aside the forfeiture and awarding interest on the refunded amount. | ["Real Estate", "Re…["Real Estate", "Refund", "Interest"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t…{"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that the respondents had forfeited 10% of her amount and not given her any interest on the refunded amount.", "respondent_claim": "The respondents claimed that the appellant had defaulted in making the deposit and therefore, the forfeiture was justified.", "final_verdict": "The appellate tribunal modified the order, setting aside the forfeiture of 10% and awarding interest @ 7% for 2 years on the refunded amount.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Mrs. Sarla wife of …Mrs. Sarla wife of Col Tej Bhan | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC 0305 of 2022GC 0305 of 2022 | PunjabPunjab | Complainants sought possession of a flat from the…Complainants sought possession of a flat from the developer, Mainstreet Developers Pvt. Ltd. The Authority directed the developer to pay interest for the delay in possession and considered an offer of an alternate flat. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest for delay"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed that the developer failed to deliver possession of the flat by the agreed-upon date and sought relief.", "respondent_claim": "The developer claimed that the delay was due to the COVID-19 pandemic and sought to extend the possession date.", "final_verdict": "The Authority directed the developer to pay interest for the delay in possession and considered an offer of an alternate flat.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Venus LawrenceVenus Lawrence | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| 1184 of 20191184 of 2019 | PunjabPunjab | The complainants, Nitin Jindal and Suresh Jindal,…The complainants, Nitin Jindal and Suresh Jindal, alleged various irregularities by the respondents, including delay in handing over possession of a unit. The authority partly accepted the complaint and directed the respondents to pay interest for the delay. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest payment"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants alleged tha…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants alleged that possession of the unit was not handed over by the respondents despite the due date of 20.03.2015. They also alleged that the respondents had made unapproved changes in the layout plans of the project.", "respondent_claim": "The respondents claimed that possession was handed over on 26.02.2019 and that the complainants had accepted compensation for the delay. They also claimed that the Completion Certificate had been duly obtained and covered the unit allotted to the complainants.", "final_verdict": "The authority partly accepted the complaint and directed the respondents to pay interest for the period of delay. The amount due was to be paid within 2 months from the date of receipt of the order.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Suresh JindalSuresh Jindal | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| ADC No.1737/2020 SP…ADC No.1737/2020 SPLTOOO6 of 2021 | PunjabPunjab | Complainants sought refund for delayed possession…Complainants sought refund for delayed possession of a residential unit. Authority directed refund with interest, after finding respondent liable for delay. | ["Delayed possessio…["Delayed possession", "Refund"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed ref…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed refund for the delayed possession of their residential unit, along with interest and compensation.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that possession was offered, but the complainants did not take it, and that the agreement was not as per the rules.", "final_verdict": "The Authority directed the respondent to refund the amount paid by the complainants, along with interest, after finding the respondent liable for the delay in possession.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} | Anuja DubeyAnuja Dubey | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. Includes summaries and key insights.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims
Withdrawal of Complaints
Claims for Refunds and Interest
Jurisdictional Issues
Compensation for Delay
Non-maintainability of Complaints
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder Sushma Buildtech Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information about recurring themes and outcomes.
Delayed Possession Claims
A significant number of complaints revolved around the delayed possession of properties, with claimants seeking compensation and interest for the delay. However, in many of these instances, the builder successfully argued that the delays were justified due to external factors like the COVID-19 pandemic or that possession was eventually offered within acceptable limits.
Withdrawal of Complaints
Several cases were dismissed as withdrawn, suggesting that many claimants reconsidered their positions or were satisfied with prior resolutions. This indicates a possibility that initial claims were either exaggerated or that the buyers were not fully aware of the settlement agreements made earlier.
Claims for Refunds and Interest
There were multiple cases where complainants sought refunds for amounts paid, citing either failure to deliver possession or delays. The builder countered these claims by asserting that the complaints were not maintainable, either due to jurisdictional issues or previous compensation agreements.
Jurisdictional Issues
Some cases highlighted a lack of jurisdiction for the Adjudicating Officer to grant the relief sought by the complainants. This technicality played a crucial role in favor of the builder when claims were returned due to the procedural oversights defined in RERA.
Compensation for Delay
In cases where compensation for delayed possession was sought, the builder often demonstrated that earlier settlements had relieved them of any further claims, underscoring the contractual obligations both parties agreed upon initially.
Non-maintainability of Complaints
Many complaints were dismissed on the grounds of non-maintainability, indicating that the evidence brought forth by the complainants was insufficient or that the claims did not comply with legal standards.
The reasons for these cases being brought to court predominantly stemmed from buyer dissatisfaction over project delays, claims for unmet obligations, and the desire for refunds. As patterns emerged from the summaries, it became apparent that many buyers may have entered disputes based on misunderstandings or inflated expectations regarding project timelines and builder commitments.
Sushma Buildtech Limited's success in these cases can be attributed to several factors. The builder skillfully defended against claims that lacked sufficient evidence or that were not aligned with the legal framework governing real estate transactions. Moreover, builders often face false or exaggerated claims from buyers whose expectations or understanding of contracts might not align with legal stipulations and requirements.
This analysis serves as a testament to the builder's reputation as a capable entity in the real estate market, where it has maintained a strong track record in effectively navigating and disputing claims. It illustrates the reality that not all irate complaints translate into justifiable claims, and buyers can sometimes misinterpret or misconstrue the terms of their agreements.
In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to make informed decisions based on complete information. While legitimate disputes occur in the real estate market, the trend reflected in these summaries suggests that builders like Sushma Buildtech Limited can robustly defend themselves against unjust allegations. Buyers should ensure they understand their agreements thoroughly and rely on well-documented information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation.
This table provides details of individual cases contributing to the summary above. Click rows to expand content. Use "Show More/Less" buttons below.
| Case No. | State | Summary | Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant | Respondent | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC-1019 of 2018GC-1019 of 2018 | PunjabPunjab | Complainant Mrs. Sarla sought refund of deposited…Complainant Mrs. Sarla sought refund of deposited amount and compensation for non-delivery of possession of a commercial unit in the real estate project 'Sushma Infinium'. The Chairperson held that the complainant was a chronic defaulter and not entitled to any interest on the deposited amount. | ["Default in paymen…["Default in payment", "Non-delivery of possession"] | {"appellant_claim": "Refund of deposited amount a…{"appellant_claim": "Refund of deposited amount and compensation for non-delivery of possession of a commercial unit.", "respondent_claim": "The complainant was a chronic defaulter and not entitled to any interest on the deposited amount.", "final_verdict": "The complainant was not entitled to any interest on the deposited amount. The due amount should be refunded to the complainant within 2 months of the date of receipt of this order.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Mrs. SarlaMrs. Sarla | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/GC No.1557 of …RERA/GC No.1557 of 2020 | PunjabPunjab | Complainants withdrew their complaint after recei…Complainants withdrew their complaint after receiving relief from the respondent. The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn. | ["Withdrawn complai…["Withdrawn complaint"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants sought reli…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants sought relief in the complaint.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the relief sought had been granted.", "final_verdict": "The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | P NithyaP Nithya | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC No. 18262020GC No. 18262020 | PunjabPunjab | Complainants sought compensation for delayed poss…Complainants sought compensation for delayed possession of a flat, but their claim was dismissed as they had already received compensation and entered into a settlement with the developer. | ["Delayed possessio…["Delayed possession", "Compensation"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed com…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed compensation for delayed possession of their flat and sought interest for the period of delay.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent argued that the complainants had already received compensation and entered into a settlement with them, and therefore their claim was not maintainable.", "final_verdict": "The complaint was dismissed as the complainants had already received compensation and entered into a settlement with the respondent.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Veena ChhabraVeena Chhabra | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| 16232020BF-TR16232020BF-TR | PunjabPunjab | Complaint filed for refund, interest, and compens…Complaint filed for refund, interest, and compensation for incomplete project. Authority dismissed the complaint as the possession was offered after completion of the project and assured returns were paid till the agreed date. | ["Refund", "Interes…["Refund", "Interest", "Compensation"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that the possession was offered before the project was complete and sought refund, interest, and compensation.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the possession was offered after the project was complete and assured returns were paid till the agreed date.", "final_verdict": "The Authority dismissed the complaint as the possession was offered after completion of the project and assured returns were paid till the agreed date.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Gaurav BansalGaurav Bansal | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| AdC 0192 of 2021AdC 0192 of 2021 | PunjabPunjab | Complainant sought refund of Rs.2.50 lakhs for ap…Complainant sought refund of Rs.2.50 lakhs for apartment booking, but complaint was dismissed as complainant's contentions had no merit. | ["Refund for apartm…["Refund for apartment booking"] | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant claimed refund o…{"appellant_claim": "Complainant claimed refund of Rs.2.50 lakhs for apartment booking, stating that he was asked to opt for a different unit than the one he had originally booked.", "respondent_claim": "Respondent claimed that the complainant had applied for the allotment of the flat in question from the beginning and that the complainant's contentions had no merit.", "final_verdict": "Complaint was dismissed as the complainant's contentions had no merit.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Om DuttOm Dutt | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| 17502020TR-AUTHO009…17502020TR-AUTHO0092022 | PunjabPunjab | The complainant sought refund of the amount paid …The complainant sought refund of the amount paid for a delayed office space, but the authority dismissed the complaint as the complainant had been adequately compensated for the delay through assured returns. | ["Delayed possessio…["Delayed possession", "Assured returns"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that the respondent had delayed the possession of the office space and sought refund of the amount paid.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the complainant had been adequately compensated for the delay through assured returns and that the possession was offered after completion of the project.", "final_verdict": "The authority dismissed the complaint as the complainant had been adequately compensated for the delay through assured returns.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Gurpal SinghGurpal Singh | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| 01842021BF01842021BF | PunjabPunjab | Complainant sought refund for delayed possession …Complainant sought refund for delayed possession of commercial unit. Authority dismissed complaint as refund sought after valid offer of possession. | ["Refund for delaye…["Refund for delayed possession"] | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant sought refund fo…{"appellant_claim": "Complainant sought refund for delayed possession of commercial unit, claiming 100% of BSP paid and no valid offer of possession made.", "respondent_claim": "Respondent claimed valid offer of possession made on 14.06.2021, after obtaining CC/OC on 25.07.2019, and refund sought after delay.", "final_verdict": "Authority dismissed complaint as refund sought after valid offer of possession made on 14.06.2021.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Sumit AerySumit Aery | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/GC No. 0318/20…RERA/GC No. 0318/2021BF | PunjabPunjab | The complainant, Alka Masta, filed a complaint ag…The complainant, Alka Masta, filed a complaint against Sushma Buildtech Ltd. for refund of Rs.17,95,500/- along with interest. The Authority dismissed the complaint being devoid of merits. | ["Refund", "Interes…["Refund", "Interest"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed refu…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed refund of Rs.17,95,500/- along with interest.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the complainant was a defaulter and had not paid the due amounts.", "final_verdict": "The Authority dismissed the complaint being devoid of merits.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Alka MastaAlka Masta | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC 0325 of 2021GC 0325 of 2021 | PunjabPunjab | Complainant Ashok Kumar Chauhan filed a complaint…Complainant Ashok Kumar Chauhan filed a complaint against Sushma Buildtech Limited for not delivering possession of an apartment within the stipulated time. The complaint was dismissed as the complainant had entered into a valid settlement with the respondent. | ["Valid settlement"…["Valid settlement", "Possession of apartment"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that the respondent did not deliver possession of the apartment within the stipulated time and sought a direction to the respondent to hand over possession of the apartment complete in all respects and payment of interest for the period of delay.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that possession had been offered to the complainant and had already been taken on 23.4.2021, before the filing of the complaint.", "final_verdict": "The complaint was dismissed as the complainant had entered into a valid settlement with the respondent.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Ashok Kumar ChauhanAshok Kumar Chauhan | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GC No.0410/2021GC No.0410/2021 | PunjabPunjab | The complainant, Mrs. Parminderjit Saluja, filed …The complainant, Mrs. Parminderjit Saluja, filed a complaint against M/s Sushma Buildtech Ltd for delay in possession of an apartment. The complainant had booked the apartment on 14.02.2012 and possession was given on 03.01.2020. The complainant claimed interest for delay in possession, but the Authority dismissed the complaint as the complainant had indemnified the respondent against any claims and losses. | ["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest for delay"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed inte…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed interest for delay in possession of the apartment, which was booked on 14.02.2012 and possession was given on 03.01.2020.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the complainant had indemnified them against any claims and losses, and therefore, the complainant was not eligible for interest for delay in possession.", "final_verdict": "The Authority dismissed the complaint as the complainant had indemnified the respondent against any claims and losses.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Mrs. Parminderjit S…Mrs. Parminderjit Saluja | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GCNo.0593 of 2022GCNo.0593 of 2022 | PunjabPunjab | The matter has been settled between the parties, …The matter has been settled between the parties, and a settlement deed has been submitted. The complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. | ["Settlement"]["Settlement"] | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c…{"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "The complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Jagmeet Singh KhannaJagmeet Singh Khanna | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GCNo.0596 of 2022GCNo.0596 of 2022 | PunjabPunjab | The matter has been settled between the parties. …The matter has been settled between the parties. A settlement deed has been submitted. | ["Settlement"]["Settlement"] | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c…{"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "The matter is dismissed as withdrawn.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Prabieet SinghPrabieet Singh | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| ADC No.1016/2018ADC No.1016/2018 | PunjabPunjab | Complaint for refund and interest for non-deliver…Complaint for refund and interest for non-delivery of possession of a property. Case returned to complainant due to lack of jurisdiction to grant relief. | ["Non-delivery of p…["Non-delivery of possession", "Refund and interest"] | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant sought refun…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant sought refund, interest, etc. for non-delivery of possession of a property despite payment of Rs. 68,88,605/-.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the Adjudicating Officer lacks jurisdiction to grant relief of refund or interest.", "final_verdict": "The complaint was returned to the complainant due to lack of jurisdiction to grant relief.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Aman Kumar SharmaAman Kumar Sharma | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| GCNo12402019GCNo12402019 | PunjabPunjab | Aman Kumar Sharma filed a complaint against Sushm…Aman Kumar Sharma filed a complaint against Sushma Buildtech Limited, but neither he nor his representative appeared in court. The case was dismissed in default after the respondent stated that the matter had been settled between the parties. | default dismissaldefault dismissal | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c…{"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "The complaint was dismissed in default because the appellant did not appear in court despite multiple calls.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Aman Kumar SharmaAman Kumar Sharma | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| ADC No. 1405/2019ADC No. 1405/2019 | PunjabPunjab | The complainant filed a complaint in Form 'N' for…The complainant filed a complaint in Form 'N' for claiming relief under RERA, but later withdrew the complaint without notice. The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn. | Withdrawal of compl…Withdrawal of complaint | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed reli…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed relief under RERA, but later withdrew the complaint without notice.", "respondent_claim": "None", "final_verdict": "The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Shivani GuptaShivani Gupta | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/AdCNo0079 OF 2…RERA/AdCNo0079 OF 2021 | Not providedNot provided | The complainant, Yogesh Narula, received a cheque…The complainant, Yogesh Narula, received a cheque of Rs. 50,000 from the respondent, M/s. Sushma Buildtech Limited, and withdrew the complaint as fully satisfied. The file was dismissed as withdrawn. | Withdrawn complaintWithdrawn complaint | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed an u…{"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed an unknown amount from the respondent.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the complainant was fully satisfied with the payment of Rs. 50,000.", "final_verdict": "The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn as the complainant was fully satisfied with the payment.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Yogesh NarulaYogesh Narula | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/ AdCNo 0192 OF…RERA/ AdCNo 0192 OF 2021 | Not providedNot provided | The complainant failed to appear for the hearing …The complainant failed to appear for the hearing despite being intimated, resulting in the case being dismissed in default. | ["default dismissal…["default dismissal"] | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c…{"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "The case was dismissed in default due to the complainant's failure to appear for the hearing.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Om DuttOm Dutt | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| F.A.NO. 259 OF 2020F.A.NO. 259 OF 2020 | PunjabPunjab | Parvesh Bansal filed an appeal against Bharat Mit…Parvesh Bansal filed an appeal against Bharat Mittal and Sushma Buildtech Limited, seeking modification of an order passed by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Punjab. The appeal was deemed not pressed and disposed of accordingly. | ["Modification of o…["Modification of order", "Real Estate"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant sought modific…{"appellant_claim": "The appellant sought modification of an order passed by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Punjab.", "respondent_claim": "The respondents had no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal.", "final_verdict": "The appeal was deemed not pressed and disposed of accordingly.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Parvesh BansalParvesh Bansal | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/ AdCNo 0264 OF…RERA/ AdCNo 0264 OF 2021 | Not providedNot provided | The parties entered into a written settlement on …The parties entered into a written settlement on 15.12.2023, and the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. The parties are bound to comply with the terms and conditions of the settlement deed. | ["Settlement", "Wit…["Settlement", "Withdrawal"] | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c…{"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "The complaint is dismissed as withdrawn, and the parties are bound to comply with the terms and conditions of the settlement deed.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Satish KhoslaSatish Khosla | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| RERA/AdC No.0036/20…RERA/AdC No.0036/2022 | PunjabPunjab | Complainants sought compensation for delay in del…Complainants sought compensation for delay in delivery of possession by respondent/builder. Complaint dismissed as not maintainable. | ["Delay in delivery…["Delay in delivery of possession", "Compensation"] | {"appellant_claim": "Complainants sought compensa…{"appellant_claim": "Complainants sought compensation for delay in delivery of possession by respondent/builder.", "respondent_claim": "Respondents claimed that the complaint was not maintainable as the project had been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and that the complainants were only entitled to interest on the amount paid for the period of delay.", "final_verdict": "The complaint was dismissed as not maintainable.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Venus LawrenceVenus Lawrence | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| AO/49/2018AO/49/2018 | PunjabPunjab | Complaint filed for refund, interest, and compens…Complaint filed for refund, interest, and compensation for delay in possession of flat. Adjudicating Officer lacks jurisdiction to grant refund and interest, so complaint is returned to complainants. | ["Refund", "Interes…["Refund", "Interest", "Compensation"] | {"appellant_claim": "Complainants claim refund, i…{"appellant_claim": "Complainants claim refund, interest, and compensation for delay in possession of flat.", "respondent_claim": "Respondents claim that Adjudicating Officer lacks jurisdiction to grant refund and interest.", "final_verdict": "Complaint is returned to complainants, who are at liberty to file a fresh complaint before the Authority.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Naresh Kumar GuptaNaresh Kumar Gupta | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
| 155 of 2022155 of 2022 | PunjabPunjab | Alka Masta filed an appeal against Sushma Buildte…Alka Masta filed an appeal against Sushma Buildtech Ltd. and Punjab Real Estate Regulatory Authority. The appeal was disposed of as the matter was resolved with the respondent. | ["Real Estate", "Ap…["Real Estate", "Appeal"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t…{"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that the respondent had not fulfilled their obligations.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that they had fulfilled their obligations.", "final_verdict": "The appeal was disposed of as the matter was resolved with the respondent.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "yes"} | Alka MastaAlka Masta | Sushma Buildtech Li…Sushma Buildtech Limited | Link |
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!