SUWALKA AND SUWALKA PROPERTIES AND BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

Suwalka and Suwalka Properties and Builders Private Limited has been involved in various legal proceedings over the years, particularly within Rajasthan. With a total of eight complaints against them, the outcomes of these cases offer insights into the builder's operations and customer satisfaction. In this blog post, we'll delve into the details of the legal cases associated with Suwalka and Suwalka, analyzing their victories and losses to help potential buyers understand the builder's reputation.

Overview of Legal Cases

Suwalka and Suwalka's involvement in legal disputes has resulted in five cases won and three cases lost. Here's a summary of these outcomes:

Cases Lost

1. Conclusion and Agreements: Several complaints were dismissed in default primarily due to the complainants' absence, highlighting potential communication issues or misunderstandings over agreements made by the third-party company, M/s Pranay Infra.
2. Real Estate Agreement Issues: A consistent theme among the lost cases was the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Suwalka and Suwalka Properties and Builders Private Limited, which the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the various disputes.

The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: non-compliance with RERA regulations, penalties for project delays, and incomplete documentation and compliance. The first type pertains to the builder's failure to adhere to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, which resulted in the Authority taking over the project and imposing penalties.

The second category involves penalties imposed due to delays in completing projects or uploading necessary documentation. In one instance, a penalty of Rs. 25,000 was imposed for not uploading a completion certificate in time, highlighting the importance of maintaining thorough records in a timely manner.

The third theme centers around incomplete documentation and compliance, where the builder was penalized where the builder was penalized for contraventions that reflect a …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Suwalka and Suwalka Properties and Builders Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into several recurring themes that highlight the primary disputes arising in these legal matters.

1. Non-compliance with Agreements: Many complaints were based on claims that the builder did not fulfill their part of agreements. However, the builder consistently defended itself by demonstrating that there were no agreements directly with the claimants, or that agreements existed with different entities. For instance, in one case, the complainant had an agreement with another company, M/s Pranay Infra, rather than the respondent.
2. Disputes over Contractual Obligations: Several of the cases involved disputes regarding the expectations set out in real estate agreements, with claimants seeking either early possession of properties or full refunds. Suwalka argued that amicable settlements had been reached, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis