CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the competitive world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth and satisfying home buying experience. Today, we will take an in-depth look at SWADESH DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERS, analyzing their reputation, track record, and understanding what potential buyers should consider before making a purchase from them.
SWADESH DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERS is primarily operating in Madhya Pradesh, where they have made their mark in the construction and property development sector. However, it’s essential to delve into their track record, specifically focusing on legal matters, to gauge their reliability and customer service.
According to the data, SWADESH DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERS has faced a total of 1 complaint. They lost this case, indicating potential issues regarding customer satisfaction or adherence to agreements.
Based on the provided data, SWADESH DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERS poses a potential risk for buyers. They have faced legal implications regarding safety standards, leading to a loss in the only case documented. For prospective buyers, it's essential to approach purchasing with caution and thorough due diligence.
In summary, while SWADESH DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERS may have projects in Madhya Pradesh, the legal implications raise concerns that buyers should carefully consider. By following the tips above, potential homeowners can make informed choices and navigate the home buying process more safely.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Swadesh Developers and Builders, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion or classification, and hazards associated with inflammatory materials.
The first type involves situations where the builder failed to adhere to the regulatory framework established by local authorities. For instance, the builder was found to have rented out a basement for non-residential purposes without proper permission. This highlights a pattern of neglecting compliance, which led to legal consequences.
The second category encompasses disputes related to the classification of land and the intended use of properties. In the case summarized, the builder faced claims over using a basement as a warehouse, which contradicts residential zoning regulations. This indicates a common issue where builders may misunderstand or overlook zoning restrictions, leading to legal challenges.
The third theme centers on the risks posed by inflammatory materials stored in residential areas. In one case, the applicant sought relief due to the presence of such materials in the basement, which reflects a broader concern about safety and the builder’s obligation to provide a secure environment for homeowners.
A recurring reason for the litigation in these cases was the builder’s actions that either breached regulatory requirements or created hazards that prompted legal action from other parties. Common triggers for these disputes include the builder's decision to use properties for purposes other than what was intended, failure to obtain necessary permissions, and neglect of safety protocols.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence of compliance with municipal regulations and a failure to meet their commitments to homeowners regarding property use and safety. The verdicts emphasize the importance of adhering to legal standards in real estate development and the need for builders to prioritize homeowner safety and satisfaction.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!