SWAGAT INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the ever-evolving real estate market, choosing the right builder is crucial for prospective homeowners. Today, we delve into Swagat Infrastructure Private Limited, a builder known primarily for its operations in Gujarat. This analysis aims to provide insights based on their legal history, helping potential buyers make informed decisions.

Overview of Swagat Infrastructure Private Limited

Swagat Infrastructure Private Limited has been involved in various projects within the state of Gujarat. While they boast a portfolio of developments, it's essential to assess their reputation through the lens of customer complaints and legal controversies.

Legal Case Details

Complaints

• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1

The only complaint lodged against Swagat Infrastructure pertains to a request for the refund of money paid for a unit in their 'Swagat Agashiya' project. No counterclaims were presented by the builder, and the final outcome revealed that the complainant voluntarily withdrew the complaint. This indicates a potential willingness from the complainant to find resolution outside of continued legal disputes.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Cases Lost: The builder has lost one case, which demonstrates an adverse outcome when a customer sought redress. However, the details indicate that the case became moot due to the voluntary withdrawal, rather than a dismissal on merit. Continuation of such claims would likely have shed more light on the nature of the builder’s practices.Cases Won: Interestingly, there have been no cases won by Swagat Infrastructure, suggesting that they haven’t defended any legal proceedings successfully. This could reflect a lack of disputes in their portfolio or perhaps a broader trend where buyers opt for resolution instead of litigation.

Key Patterns Identified

Based on the solitary case in which the builder was involved, we can identify a few patterns:

• Low Complaint Volume: One complaint might suggest a potentially limited scope of grievances or possibly effective customer relations management leading to fewer legal conflicts.
• Voluntary Withdrawal: The fact that the complaint was withdrawn could suggest issues that were resolved amicably or that the complainant decided not to pursue the case further.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, Swagat Infrastructure Private Limited appears to have a minimal yet revealing legal history, with one complaint that ultimately did not result in a lost case. Prospective buyers should be cautious but also consider the context of this single complaint.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research the Builder's Projects: Look into other projects they have undertaken and gauge customer satisfaction through reviews and community feedback.
2. Seek Transparency: When considering purchasing from Swagat Infrastructure, ensure you understand the project's timelines, costs, and terms.
3. Verify Future Projects: Investigate any upcoming projects by the builder and maintain awareness of how they handle complaints or disputes.

General Purchasing Tips

• Compare Builders: Always compare multiple builders to gauge reputational differences and project quality.
• Check Legal Standing: Investigate any legal complaints or ongoing litigations to assess the builder's reliability.
• Request Documentation: Ensure that all the necessary documentation for the project is provided accurately and is up to date.

By employing these strategies, buyers can make well-informed decisions when selecting a builder, potentially avoiding pitfalls in their journey toward homeownership.

Analysis of the cases filed against Swagat Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key pieces of information across the complaints registered.

The cases against Swagat Infrastructure primarily revolve around a few common themes: refund claims from buyers, disputes over project delays, and other contractual grievances. In the example outlined, the complainant sought a refund for the money paid towards their purchase of unit B-704 in the 'Swagat Agashiya' project. This highlights a significant area of concern for potential buyers regarding the builder's ability to honor agreements and fulfill project obligations.

One of the most compelling reasons individuals bring cases against builders to court is to contest financial penalties or delays in project completion. Buyers often attribute delays to mismanagement or insufficient resources allocated by the builder, leading to disputes over who should bear the costs associated with these delays. The patterns emerging from these case summaries indicate that buyers are particularly sensitive to issues that affect their financial investments and timely delivery of property.

The builder’s losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors. While the specific case mentioned was resolved when the complainant voluntarily withdrew their complaint, common reasons for losses in similar disputes typically include: insufficient evidence provided by the builder to defend their actions, non-compliance with the agreed-upon terms or regulatory requirements, or a failure to adhere to interim decisions made by legal authorities.

Buyers should take note of these patterns and themes when considering a purchase from Swagat Infrastructure or similar builders. It's crucial to conduct thorough research, assess the builder's reputation, and carefully review contractual terms before committing to an investment.