SWARNA INFRACON

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, selecting the right builder is crucial for a smooth purchasing experience. Today, we focus on Swarna Infracon, a builder operating in the state of Chhattisgarh. With a limited number of complaints and an impressive track record in legal disputes, this article delves into Swarna Infracon’s performance, its interaction with the law, and what potential buyers should know before making a decision.

Legal Case Highlights

Swarna Infracon has been involved in one legal case, which it successfully won. Here’s a closer look at the details:

1. Case Filed & Won: 1 Case
   • Appellant'sClaim: The applicant admitted to a bona fide mistake of not mentioning the RERA registration number and website in their advertisements for the property.
   • Respondent’s Claim: The respondent claimed that this omission violated provisions set forth in the RERA Act.
   • Final Verdict: The authority recognized the mistake as genuine and chose to close the case, issuing a warning to the applicant to ensure that the RERA registration number and website are included in future advertisements.

This case demonstrates that Swarna Infracon is willing to engage with regulatory frameworks and has successfully navigated a legal challenge.

Analysis of Legal Performance

Cases Lost:

• Patterns & Common Factors:
  • Swarna Infracon has not lost any legal cases according to the provided data, suggesting a strong adherence to industry regulations or effective legal strategies when challenged.

Cases Won:

• Patterns & Common Factors:
  • The only case concluded with a win showcased an emphasis on compliance with RERA regulations. The authority's decision to classify the non-compliance as a bona fide mistake rather than intentional deceit implies that Swarna Infracon is generally vigilant, though potentially requiring more attention to detail in marketing practices.

Conclusion

Based on the available information, Swarna Infracon presents itself as a competent builder in Chhattisgarh. With only one reported complaint and a successful outcome in its legal case, buyers might find a level of assurance in their operations. Nonetheless, the warning issued serves as a reminder that even reputable builders can occasionally falter in compliance matters.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Research: Look into the builder’s past projects, customer feedback, and any legal issues that may have arisen, even if they're few in number.
• RERA Registration: Ensure that the builder provides RERA registration details for transparency and credibility.
• Communication: Don't hesitate to ask the builder specific questions about compliance and previous legal cases, no matter how minor.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

1. Due Diligence: Conduct thorough research and verify the builder’s credibility through reviews, ratings, and past project inspections.
2. Check for Complaints: Explore consumer complaint boards or RERA databases for any unresolved issues against the builder.
3. Legal Documentation: Ensure all agreements are clear and transparent, preferably reviewed by a legal expert.
4. Visit Completed Projects: Inspect previous developments to gauge quality and design consistency.

By keeping these insights in mind, buyers can make informed decisions that align with their housing needs and expectations.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Swarna Infracon, which it won, revealed the following information:

The builder's disputes can be grouped into a few common themes, primarily revolving around regulatory compliance issues and disputes regarding advertising practices. For instance, one notable case involved the omission of the RERA registration number and website in advertisements, where the builder claimed a bona fide mistake. This highlights the frequent clashes between builders and regulatory frameworks, particularly concerning the adherence to promotional guidelines.

Commonly, the builder pursued these legal actions to contest claims against them that centered on penalties or compliance with regulations, akin to the aforementioned case. These disputes often arose from accusations by buyers or regulatory bodies which the builder perceived as unfounded or exaggerated. Patterns emerging from these summaries suggest that misunderstandings about legal requirements and advertising norms could lead to litigation, with the builder seeking to clarify their position and protect their interests.

The reasons behind the builder's success in these legal battles often stemmed from the lack of sufficient evidence presented by the opposing parties or from a failure of these parties to adhere to legal standards themselves. In the cited case, the authority acknowledged the builder's bona fide mistake while issuing a warning, thus validating Swarna Infracon's overall commitment to rectifying such issues proactively. This successful defense against exaggerated or unfounded claims illustrates the builder's capability to navigate through legal challenges effectively.

Analyzing these case outcomes provides us with a snapshot of the builder's reputation in the real estate market. It raises an important observation that, at times, buyers may make unfounded or exaggerated accusations against builders, prompting legal confrontations. Swarna Infracon, through its successful defenses, has demonstrated a robust track record of addressing such litigation effectively, emerging successful due to solid legal backing and adherence to regulations.

For potential buyers, this analysis underscores the necessity of exercising diligence and making informed decisions when evaluating builders. While legitimate disputes do exist in the realm of real estate, the findings indicate that builders like Swarna Infracon often prove resilient against unwarranted claims. Thus, it is crucial for buyers to approach claims with a discerning eye, gathering reliable information before forming judgments regarding a builder's reliability and standing in the industry.