| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate, a thorough understanding of a builder's track record is essential for potential buyers. This blog post delves into SWASTIK DEVELOPERS, analyzing their legal history, particularly the cases they have faced, and provides insights for prospective buyers.
SWASTIK DEVELOPERS at a Glance
SWASTIK DEVELOPERS operates primarily in Chhattisgarh and Gujarat, with a total of 15 complaints filed against them. The builder has faced litigation on multiple fronts, leading to a mixed record in legal outcomes: 5 cases won and 10 cases lost.
Legal Case Details
Cases Lost
- Single case filed by the builder: In this instance, SWASTIK DEVELOPERS claimed compliance with regulations; however, they lost the verdict, resulting in a fine of Rs. 25,000/- for failing to meet the necessary guidelines under the authority's regulations.
- Case filed against the builder: A consumer alleged that the builder did not provide accurate …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Swastik Developers, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into their operational practices and compliance with regulatory requirements. The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes, each highlighting a unique aspect of the builder's disputes.
Many cases centered around the Failure to Provide Necessary Amenities, where the applicants claimed that Swastik Developers did not deliver promised amenities and services for projects like 'Galaxy New Town'. This suggests a pattern of neglecting essential requirements that homebuyers expect, leading to multiple legal challenges.
Non-Compliance with Information Disclosure emerged as another theme. In one case, the applicant alleged that the builder failed to provide information regarding the approved layout, specifications, or other permissions of the project. This highlights an important issue: transparency is crucial in real estate, and withholding vital information can prompt legal action.
Fraudulent Activities and Illegal Construction also stood out, with a …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by Swastik Developers, where they faced defeat, reveals a pattern of disputes primarily centered around non-compliance with regulatory guidelines and associated penalties.
One of the most notable themes is the builder's struggle with non-compliance. In the examined case, the builder claimed adherence to all regulations and guidelines set forth by the relevant authority. However, the opposing party successfully contested this claim, leading to an imposed fine for non-compliance. This highlights a significant issue in the builder's operations, where despite claims of compliance, legal outcomes indicate otherwise.
Another prominent theme in the disputes seems to be the penalties arising from non-compliance. The builder's legal actions appeared to center around contesting financial penalties imposed due to failures in meeting regulations. The narrative suggests an attempt by Swastik Developers to push against the responsibilities placed upon them by municipal regulations.
Common triggers for litigation by the builder …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information.
The cases filed primarily fall under three key themes: Regulatory Non-compliance, Documentation Disputes, and Project Registration Issues. Each of these themes highlights the recurring issues that SWASTIK DEVELOPERS has faced in its transactions with regulatory authorities and buyers.
- Regulatory Non-compliance: The builder frequently encountered claims regarding the submission of mandatory documents required for project registration. In several cases, the Chhattisgarh RERA alleged non-compliance pertaining to the absence of crucial documentation, which SWASTIK DEVELOPERS contested successfully, arguing that these claims were unfounded.
- Documentation Disputes: A significant number of cases involved disputes about the adequacy of the paperwork submitted. The builder maintained that they had submitted necessary documents while asserting that the regulatory body often misinterpreted or overlooked these submissions, leading to twisted claims against them.
- Project Registration Issues: Another common …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SWASTIK DEVELOPERS, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The primary theme in these cases concerns Rental Disputes and Ownership Transfer Issues. In particular, the disputes often revolved around allegations regarding the failure to provide correct rental agreements and the timely transfer of property ownership. These themes highlight the common friction points between buyers and builders, particularly in a complex real estate environment.
Many of these cases arise from buyers contesting the legitimacy of the rental agreements or delaying ownership handovers. Buyers frequently express concerns over unclear or misinterpreted terms within agreements, leading to dissatisfaction and the feeling that their rights are being infringed upon. Such conflicts serve as catalysts for legal action, where buyers seek to enforce what they believe to be their entitlements.
In the specific case against SWASTIK DEVELOPERS, the builder successfully defended itself by …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!