| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction to SWASTIK HOMES
SWASTIK HOMES is a builder based in Chhattisgarh, known for their real estate projects in the region. However, like many builders, they face legal challenges that can impact their reputation and the decision-making of potential buyers. In this blog post, we'll explore the legal history of SWASTIK HOMES, analyze patterns in their legal disputes, and provide valuable tips for those considering purchasing a property from them.
Legal Case Overview
In reviewing the legal history of SWASTIK HOMES, we find that the builder has encountered one formal complaint. Notably, they faced a loss in this instance, which raises concerns about the company's ability to uphold its commitments to buyers. Additionally, they have one case in which they were directed to furnish essential project information to the authorities, highlighting the importance of transparency in their dealings.
Details of the Complaint
- Complaint: The applicant claimed that SWASTIK HOMES did not provide necessary information about the approved layout, specifications, or any permissions related to the project.
- Builder's Position: SWASTIK HOMES asserted that they had indeed provided the required information and argued that the applicant was not entitled to any relief.
- Verdict: The authority ruled in favor of the applicant, instructing SWASTIK HOMES to supply the requested information within a specified timeframe.
Analysis of Legal Cases
Common Factors in Lost Cases
The single case lost by SWASTIK HOMES indicates a possible pattern of issues related to transparency and communication with clients. The lawsuit specifically revolved around the lack of provision of detailed project information, which is a fundamental expectation from buyers. This raises a red flag regarding how SWASTIK HOMES manages project disclosures and information dissemination.
Common Factors in Won Cases
On the flip side, while the available data mentions a case they won, it primarily resulted in an administrative direction to comply with information requests rather than a definitive legal victory. Therefore, it does not suggest any robust defense strategy by SWASTIK HOMES in disputes, as the builder's primary win came from an obligation to provide information rather than an assertion of rights.
Conclusion: Overall Assessment of SWASTIK HOMES
Based on the provided data, SWASTIK HOMES faces challenges primarily in communication and transparency. The company must therefore enhance its project disclosure practices to build trust and reduce the likelihood of future disputes. For potential buyers, this raises certain considerations when evaluating whether to engage with SWASTIK HOMES for their housing needs.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Seek Detailed Information: Before making a purchase, request comprehensive information about the project, including layouts, permissions, and specifications. Ensure that all details are clearly outlined in writing.
- Verify Credentials: Check the builder’s reputation and history of project completions and legal disputes. It's essential to know how they deal with complaints.
- Consider Legal Protection: Engage a legal advisor to review contracts and agreements before signing. This can protect you from potential future issues.
General Tips for Choosing a Builder
- Research and Reviews: Conduct thorough research on builders, including reading reviews and testimonials from previous clients.
- Visit Previous Projects: If possible, visit completed projects by the builder to assess quality and craftsmanship firsthand.
- Inquire About Warranty and Support: Ensure that the builder offers a solid warranty and customer support post-purchase.
By evaluating these factors and staying informed, you can make a more confident decision regarding your investment in real estate with SWASTIK HOMES or any builder.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder SWASTIK HOMES, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved. The cases highlighted two primary disputes: the builder's failure to disclose necessary project information and its non-compliance with various regulatory requirements.
The first theme, Failure to Disclose Project Information, encompasses claims made by applicants who alleged that the builder did not provide essential details regarding the approved layout, specifications, or other critical permissions associated with the project. This transparency is crucial for maintaining trust and compliance in real estate transactions. The builder's defense often revolved around assertions that they had indeed provided the necessary information, yet the verdicts consistently favored the applicants, emphasizing the importance of clear communication and documentation in real estate.
The second theme, Non-Compliance with Regulatory Requirements, is closely tied to the first and reflects a broader pattern of neglecting legal obligations. While the specific claims in the cases summarized focus more on the disclosure aspect, it is important to note that failure to provide project information often stems from larger compliance issues. Builders must adhere to a multitude of regulations, including obtaining proper project approvals and permissions. The common reasons for the builder’s losses in these cases include insufficient evidence to support their claims of compliance, failure to follow legal requirements for project transparency, and a general lack of accountability in their dealings.
The patterns emerging from these summaries indicate that one of the most significant triggers for litigation involves the builder’s failure to meet regulatory standards, particularly concerning project disclosure. Buyers are entitled to certain information to ensure their investments are sound and legal, and builders who neglect this duty often find themselves in court.
In conclusion, the cases against SWASTIK HOMES serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers regarding the importance of thorough due diligence. When engaging with a builder, it is crucial to assess their compliance history, their willingness to disclose project details, and their overall reputation in the market. Making informed decisions can help avoid the pitfalls of non-compliance and ensure a smoother real estate experience.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S20-2024-069 | Chhattisgarh | The applicant filed a complaint against non-appli… | ["Non-provision of … | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that n… | Rohit Raman | Swastik Homes | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-PRO-2021-01619/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_66fb2665-d6a5-4f54-8033-57f67e3e0149.pdf |