SWASTIK REALTIES

In the ever-evolving world of real estate, builders play a pivotal role in shaping the landscapes of our cities and towns. One such builder is SWASTIK REALTIES, known for their projects in Chhattisgarh. In this blog post, we will delve into the builder's complaint history, legal battles, and provide insights for potential buyers.

Overview of SWASTIK REALTIES

SWASTIK REALTIES has encountered a total of two complaints, with mixed outcomes in legal cases. Of these complaints, the builder has had one case won and one case lost, indicating a need for potential buyers to conduct due diligence.

Legal Case Details

In the only case where SWASTIK REALTIES filed and won, the appellant claimed that she had fully paid for a plot but had not received possession despite multiple requests. In response, the respondent (SWASTIK REALTIES) argued that possession was provided through a sale deed executed on June 3, 2021. The final verdict from the authority ordered SWASTIK REALTIES to provide a new plot developed in the project at the applicant's choice within three months. This outcome shows that although the builder might have maintained that they fulfilled their obligations, the authority recognized the need to remedy the situation for the appellant.

Interestingly, the details of the second case lost by the builder mirror the scenario above, as it also involved claims regarding payment and the delivery of possession. The consistency in the nature of these complaints suggests that possession disputes could be a recurring theme in SWASTIK REALTIES' project implementation.

Patterns in Legal Cases

Common Factors in Lost Cases

• Delivery of Possession: Both cases illustrate a frequent issue regarding the delivery of possession, indicating a potential gap in client communication or execution of project timelines.
• Client Frustration: The need for repeated requests by clients to obtain possession points to a conceivable lack of transparency and engagement in project delivery processes.

Common Factors in Won Cases

• Claims of Fulfillment: The builder defended their position by asserting that they had fulfilled their commitments, which is a crucial defense strategy in legal disputes.
• Authority Intervention: The outcomes of the cases show that authorities may intervene to ensure clients receive what they were promised, as evidenced by the order to provide a new plot.

Conclusion: Analyzing SWASTIK REALTIES

Given the legal history, SWASTIK REALTIES possesses a mix of successes and challenges. The existence of unresolved possession disputes signifies a potential red flag for homebuyers. However, the builder's ability to win a legal case indicates that they can defend their practices in certain scenarios.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Before committing to a purchase, investigating online reviews, complaint registrations, and legal outcomes associated with SWASTIK REALTIES can provide necessary insights.
2. Seek Clarity on Deliverables: Ensure that clear documentation outlines what you will receive upon payment, including timelines and other vital details related to property possession.
3. Engage Legal Expertise: Consulting with a real estate attorney can provide knowledgeable guidance, particularly if any concerns arise during the purchasing process.

General Tips for Selecting Builders

1. Check for Complaints and Resolutions: Investigate the builder’s history regarding complaints and how they resolved them, as it can highlight their professionalism and commitment to customer satisfaction.
2. Assess Project Quality: Visit previous projects to validate the quality of construction and adherence to timelines.
3. Understand Financial Stability: Understanding the builder’s financial health can prevent future risks associated with project completion.

In summary, while SWASTIK REALTIES shows potential as a builder based on their jury verdicts, the customer experience may vary based on their project execution and involvement in complaint resolution. Potential buyers should tread cautiously and ensure they conduct comprehensive research before making any commitments.

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Swastik Realities, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims, highlighting an overarching issue with the builder's ability to deliver properties on time.

In the sole case summarized, the applicant claimed to have paid the full amount for a plot yet faced a lack of possession despite repeated requests. The builder's defense centered around the execution of a sale deed; however, the Authority ruled against them, mandating the provision of a new plot within three months. This verdict indicates a significant failure on the builder’s part to honor contractual obligations, particularly concerning timely delivery of property.

The common trigger for litigation in this case was the builder's inability to provide possession of the plot, leading the applicant to contest the situation legally. The builder lost due to insufficient evidence supporting their claim of having fulfilled their obligations. The execution of a sale deed does not constitute delivery of property; hence, it was determined that the builder failed to meet the required standards, leading to the ruling against them.

These findings highlight a pattern that can be observed with builders who face similar disputes. In many instances, builders may attribute delays to other parties or misinterpret their obligations, which can lead to a lack of compliance with regulatory requirements. Such failures typically result in legal consequences, as seen in the case of Swastik Realities.

Overall, this analysis serves as a cautionary tale for potential buyers considering properties developed by builders with a history of such legal disputes. It is essential for buyers to evaluate a builder's reputation, past performance, and the outcomes of any legal cases they may have faced before making a purchase decision.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder SWASTIK REALTIES, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolve around a few key themes.

1. Delayed Possession Claims: A common theme among the disputes involved claims from applicants regarding delayed possession of properties. Buyers argued that despite payments, they were not given possession in a timely manner.
2. Disputes Over Sale Deeds: Another recurring issue was the contention surrounding sale deeds. In certain cases, buyers claimed they had not received possession, while the builder maintained that the sale deeds had been executed.
3. Land Classification Issues: There were instances where disputes arose concerning land classification, particularly in relation to compliance with local regulations and requirements.

In examining these cases, it becomes evident that the builder frequently contested claims related to penalties and delays. Often, project delays can be attributed to external factors—such as regulatory changes or buyer-related issues—which the builder aimed to clarify and counter.

The success of SWASTIK REALTIES in these legal battles can be attributed to several factors. In many instances, the evidence presented by the opposing parties was found to be insufficient. Furthermore, the builder effectively cited instances where buyers did not comply with legal or regulatory requirements themselves or where misunderstandings regarding land classification occurred. This showcases the builder's strong strategy in defending against exaggerated or unfounded claims from buyers.

This analysis sheds light on the reputation of SWASTIK REALTIES in the broader real estate market. It is crucial to note that false accusations against builders can lead to extensive legal disputes. SWASTIK REALTIES has demonstrated a robust ability to attest its commitment to legal obligations and to challenge wrongful claims successfully.

In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to make informed decisions when entering the real estate market. While legitimate disputes do arise, the cases analyzed indicate that builders like SWASTIK REALTIES often have the means to defend against unjust claims effectively. Buyers should undertake thorough due diligence and seek reliable information before forming opinions about a builder’s reputation. Understanding the nuances behind claims can prevent misinformation and promote more informed decision-making in property purchases.