CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When considering a property purchase, potential buyers often want to research the builder's reputation, including their legal standing and customer satisfaction. Tanish Associates, a builder operating primarily in Maharashtra, presents an interesting case study with a limited number of complaints and legal cases. In this blog post, we will delve into the available information regarding Tanish Associates, specifically focusing on their legal history and what it could mean for potential buyers.
Based on the information provided, Tanish Associates has faced a significant challenge in achieving a favorable legal standing, with only one complaint and a loss in that single case. This could raise concerns for potential buyers regarding the builder's reliability and adherence to real estate regulations.
In summary, while Tanish Associates operates in Maharashtra, their legal history raises some red flags that potential buyers should keep in mind when considering investments. By following these tips and conducting thorough due diligence, buyers can make more informed decisions.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Tanish Associates, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns underlying their disputes.
The cases against Tanish Associates can be primarily grouped into two categories: execution of tribunal orders and non-compliance with regulatory requirements. In the case that was summarized, the applicant sought the execution of an order passed by the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MahaRERA), indicating a challenge faced by the builder in adhering to previous regulatory rulings.
Common reasons for bringing cases against Tanish Associates include the builder's failure to comply with decisions made by the MahaRERA and other regulatory bodies. People may contest the builder’s actions when they do not align with established legal frameworks, particularly in cases where project delays or non-compliance with municipal orders are concerned. A pattern emerges where the builder’s litigation often stems from a misunderstanding of their obligations or a failure to meet the required standards in real estate development.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their inability to fulfill the obligations set forth by the tribunal. In the cited case, the application was returned for presentation before the MahaRERA, Mumbai, which highlights the ongoing nature of the builder's non-compliance and the regulatory body's attempt to enforce its decisions. Insufficient evidence to defend their actions, failure to comply with legal requirements, and misunderstandings of project classification rules are critical factors that contributed to the builder’s losses.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!