| CIN | U70200DL2014PLC267441 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Office no 202, 2nd Floor, A-18, Rama House, Middle Circle, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001 Delhi New Delhi DL 110001 IN |
| Company Status | Public |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the bustling real estate landscape of Maharashtra, prospective buyers often seek trustworthy builders to invest their hard-earned money. One such builder is Tapir Constructions Limited. In this post, we will delve into the builder's track record, examine patterns in legal cases, and provide guidance for potential buyers.
Builder Overview
Builder Name: Tapir Constructions LimitedNumber of Complaints: 4
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 4
States with Projects: Maharashtra
Legal Case Insights
Despite having projects in Maharashtra, Tapir Constructions Limited has faced legal challenges. A thorough review of the cases reveals critical insights into the builder's operations:
Cases Lost
- Total Cases Lost: 4
- Common Factors:
- In all instances, the builder lost the cases, indicating a lack of favorable outcomes in disputes.
- The reasons for loss were not detailed in the cases; however, the consistent unfavorable judgments may signal underlying issues in contractual obligations or project execution.
Cases Won
- …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Tapir Constructions Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key points of interest. The cases highlight two primary themes: Settlement Disputes and Withdrawal of Appeals.
The first theme, Settlement Disputes, encompasses cases where the appellants claimed where the appellants claimed that the matter had been amicably settled between the parties. This suggests that many of the conflicts involving Tapir Constructions Limited were resolved through negotiation rather than escalating to a full trial. The common reason for bringing these cases to court seems to revolve around the appellants' desire to formalize their agreements and withdraw ongoing legal appeals, indicating a pattern where disputes were often contained and resolved without significant court intervention.
The second theme, Withdrawal of Appeals, further illustrates the tendency for cases against Tapir Constructions Limited to end in withdrawal rather than a verdict. In several instances, the respondent (the builder) did …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!