TATHYA INFRASPACE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the real estate market, the reputation of a builder often plays a crucial role in determining buyer confidence and investment decisions. One builder that has caught attention is TATHYA INFRASPACE Private Limited, based in Gujarat, which currently holds a concerning record in legal disputes, having lost all cases filed against them. This blog post aims to delve into the company's performance based on available complaint records, analyze patterns in legal outcomes, and provide essential tips for prospective buyers.

Understanding the Builder's Legal Standing

TATHYA INFRASPACE Private Limited has encountered 7 complaints, all of which resulted in losses for the builder. This alarming statistic raises questions about the quality of services and the trustworthiness of the builder.

Breakdown of Legal Cases

While analyzing the details of the cases, we observe some common factors:

1. Nature of Complaints: The predominant theme in the complaints revolved around defective facilities. Complainants alleged poor quality construction, inadequate parking, and a deficiency of amenities in their housing projects. These claims indicate dissatisfaction with the basic deliverables that are expected from any builder.
2. Defensive Claims: The builder argued that the facilities were compliant with the approved plans and attempted to shift responsibility by asserting that the complainants had no grounds for relief. However, this defense did not resonate well in court, as evidenced by the lost cases.
3. Penalties Imposed: In separate instances where the builder violated regulations, such as not submitting required reports, they were penalized financially. For instance, fines of Rs. 10,000, Rs. 25,000, and Rs. 50,000 were levied for various infractions against the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA). This reveals a pattern of regulatory non-compliance that contributes to the builder's troubled reputation.

Analysis of Winning Cases

Interestingly, while the builder has not won any cases outright, it is essential to note that there are instances where the authority only partially allowed complaints in favor of the complainants. This reflects poorly on the builder's commitment to meeting buyer expectations and adhering to the terms of contracts.

Summary of Complaints Summary:

• Defective Facilities Claims: All cases involving defective facilities were met with similar outcomes from the regulatory authority, demanding the provision of essential amenities like power backup, gardens, gyms, and more, within specified time limits.
• Regulatory Compliance Issues: The builder has faced repeated issues concerning filing requirements under RERA, leading to financial penalties.

Conclusion

Overall Assessment of TATHYA INFRASPACE

Given the 100% loss record in legal disputes and recurring complaints about quality and adherence to regulatory guidelines, potential buyers should approach TATHYA INFRASPACE Private Limited with caution. The prevalent themes of dissatisfaction and penalties could indicate systemic issues within the company's operations.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate the builder's previous projects, complaint history, and overall reputation in the real estate market. Do not rely solely on promotional material.
2. Check for Regulatory Compliance: Ensure that the builder adheres to all required documentation and regulations, especially under RERA, which protects buyer interests.
3. Seek Third-Party Reviews: Look for unbiased reviews or testimonials from past clients to gauge the builder's credibility and quality of work.
4. Legal Advisor Engagement: Consider consulting a legal advisor before entering any agreement with the builder to understand your rights and protections.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Evaluate Experience: Look for builders with a proven track record of delivering quality projects on time.
• Transparency Matters: Choose builders who provide clear and transparent contracts that outline all terms and conditions.
• Quality of Construction: Visit completed projects to inspect construction quality and finish.

Final Thoughts

Investing in property is a significant decision, and selecting the right builder is crucial. The insights provided above about TATHYA INFRASPACE Private Limited should help potential buyers make informed choices, safeguarding their investments in the real estate landscape.

Analysis of the cases filed against TATHYA INFRASPACE Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common disputes faced by the builder. The cases can be broadly categorized into three themes: Defective Facilities Claims, Non-Compliance with RERA Act, and Penalties for Delayed Reporting.

The majority of the cases revolved around Defective Facilities Claims, where the complainants alleged that the builder provided poor-quality construction, inadequate parking, and insufficient amenities in their housing projects. In each of these cases, the builder claimed that the facilities were provided as per the approved plan, yet the authority partially allowed the complaints, mandating the builder to furnish additional facilities within a stipulated time frameduring the verdicts.

Another recurring theme was Non-Compliance with RERA Act, which encompasses cases where the builder failed to adhere to the regulatory requirements set forth by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act. This includes failures to submit quarterly reports on time, delays in project registration, and negligence in paying imposed penalties. The builder's defense often revolved around a lack of awareness regarding their obligations under the RERA Act, which highlights an alarming misunderstanding of legal responsibilities in the real estate sector.

Penalties for Delayed Reporting also emerged as a key concern, with several cases resulting in fines for the builder's failure to furnish mandatory reports and project details within the prescribed timelines. These penalties indicate a systemic issue within the builder's operations, possibly related to compliance practices or operational inefficiencies.

The common triggers for litigation in these cases primarily involve the builder's failure to meet contractual obligations regarding project facilities and their non-compliance with critical regulatory requirements. People brought cases to court largely due to dissatisfaction with their living conditions and the builder’s neglect of duty towards providing promised amenities, alongside the builder's own violations of the RERA Act that could potentially raise concerns about the integrity of their projects.

The builder lost these cases predominantly due to insufficient evidence to support their claims of adherence to approved plans and regulatory compliance. There was also a repeated pattern of failure to fulfill interim directions provided by the authorities, which further aggravated their legal standing. Overall, this analysis paints a picture of a builder that has faced challenges related to quality assurance and legal compliance, raising important considerations for potential buyers.