CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the realm of real estate, choosing a builder is a critical decision for potential homeowners. Among numerous construction companies, Techno Construction Company has drawn some attention for its activities in Gujarat. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the builder based on complaint records and case outcomes, helping potential buyers make informed choices.
Techno Construction Company has a relatively minor track record concerning complaints, having only recorded 1 complaint against its operations. However, the outcome of this complaint showcases some concerning trends worth discussing.
In the legal landscape, Techno Construction Company has faced one case where it ultimately lost. Here’s a summary of that case:
Considering the complaint records and legal outcomes, Techno Construction Company’s reputation is seen under a cautious light. One complaint with a loss indicates potential lapses in legal and regulatory adherence. While the number of complaints is low, the nature of the complaint raises red flags for potential buyers regarding the company's commitment to transparency and compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act.
Techno Construction Company, while currently having a low number of complaints, presents potential buyers with important considerations. The lone complaint and its loss signal the need for vigilance and thorough research before committing to any construction project with them. By following the recommendations provided, prospective buyers can ensure they make informed and confident decisions in their real estate ventures.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Techno Construction Company, where the builder lost, revealed several key points across the various disputes. The cases can be primarily grouped into two common themes: regulatory non-compliance and penalties for violations.
The first theme, regulatory non-compliance, highlights the builder's failure to adhere to the provisions set forth in the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act-2016 (RERA). Specifically, the builder was found to have violated Section 11(2) by not mentioning the required RERA registration number and website in an advertisement. This points to a broader pattern of neglecting regulatory obligations, which is a common trigger for litigation in the real estate sector.
The second theme, penalties for violations, illustrates the legal consequences that builders face when they do not comply with regulations. In the case against Techno Construction Company, the Authority imposed a fine of Rs. 1,25,000, demonstrating the serious legal ramifications that can arise from such violations. The builder's defense—that the violation was not willful—suggests a pattern where builders may not fully understand their obligations or may downplay the severity of their actions.
The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases center around their failure to comply with legal requirements. The builder’s insufficient adherence to RERA regulations, combined with a lack of diligence in ensuring regulatory compliance in their advertising, led to the imposed penalty. This underscores the importance of understanding and adhering to the complex regulatory landscape in the real estate industry.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!