No Logo Available

TECHNOCULTURE BUILDING CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED

  • No of Complaints: 2
  • States (Active in): Odisha
CIN U45200BR2002PTC009767
Year Established 25-Feb-02
Address FLAT NO-301/302,THIRD FLOOR,KONARK SHREE APARTMENT H.NO-802/301,BEHIND RBI OFFICE,EXHIBITION ROAD PATNA Patna BR 800001 IN
Company Status Private

Introduction

In the realm of property development, understanding the track record of builders is crucial for prospective homebuyers. Today, we focus on TECHNOCULTURE BUILDING CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED, a builder based in Odisha, which has been subject to scrutiny due to its legal history. By examining their legal disputes, we aim to provide valuable insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Legal Cases

TECHNOCULTURE BUILDING CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED has recorded a total of two complaints filed against them, both resulting in losses for the builder. Notably, the builder has not won any legal cases. This lack of favorable outcomes raises concerns regarding their compliance and reliability.

Breakdown of Cases Lost

  1. Case 1: The complainant alleged that the builder failed to register the property, did not complete the project on time, and did not deliver possession of the flat. The court ruled that the builder must hand over possession and pay interest on the amount collected.
    • Common Factors: This case highlights the builder’s failure in project completion and timely delivery, key areas that homebuyers should be wary of.
  2. Case 2: In this instance, the builder was found liable for violating an order from the Odisha Real Estate Regulatory Authority (ORERA). The builder denied the allegations but did not provide sufficient reasons for their non-compliance, resulting in a penalty.
    • Common Factors: This case emphasizes issues with regulatory compliance and illustrates a lack of accountability from the builder.

Patterns in Cases Won

Despite TECHNOCULTURE BUILDING CENTRE's 0 wins, the two cases do illustrate some potential insights:

  • The first case indicates that projects may reach completion but not within the expected timelines or regulations set by authorities. This demonstrates a pattern of non-fulfillment of contractual obligations, which is vital for potential buyers to consider.
  • Both cases reveal a tendency to deny accountability, reflecting a possible challenge in transparent communication with clients.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis of TECHNOCULTURE BUILDING CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED's legal history, it is evident that the builder has significant issues with project delivery and regulatory adherence. The outcomes of the complaints serve as a cautionary reminder for potential buyers searching for reliability and accountability in property developers.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Conduct Thorough Research: Always investigate a builder’s legal history, including past complaints, litigation outcomes, and customer reviews.
  2. Verify Credentials: Check if the builder is registered with local real estate regulations, like ORERA in Odisha.
  3. Seek Transparency: Ensure the builder provides clear communication regarding project timelines, updates, and compliance with regulations.
  4. Demand Written Agreements: Make sure all promises and timelines are documented in a legally binding agreement.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

  1. Review Portfolio: Look at previous projects to assess quality and delivery standards.
  2. Check References: Speak to former clients to gain insights into their experiences.
  3. Evaluate Financial Stability: Ensure the builder has the financial capability to complete projects.
  4. Consult with Real Estate Experts: Professional guidance can provide additional layers of assurance in your buying decision.

In conclusion, while TECHNOCULTURE BUILDING CENTRE may have its projects in Odisha, the two lost cases indicate serious concerns about their reliability. Future homebuyers should approach with caution and consider the outlined strategies for ensuring a better purchasing experience.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Municipal Orders Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against Techno Culture Building Centre Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, and Penalties for Project Delays.

The first type of cases primarily involved claims from buyers regarding delayed possession of their flats. In one notable case, the complainant alleged that despite paying for a flat, the builder had failed to register the property in their name and had not completed the project on time. The builder's defense revolved around a lack of approval from the Bhubaneswar Development Authority for the project's plans, which indicates a recurring issue with adherence to regulatory requirements. The verdict in this case mandated the builder to fulfill their commitments, highlighting the legal expectation that builders must meet deadlines and complete projects to the satisfaction of buyers.

The second theme, Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, is exemplified by the builder's violation of an order passed by the Odisha Real Estate Regulatory Authority (ORERA). The builder was found guilty of non-compliance, leading to a penalty of Rs. 3,44,000. This case underscores a pattern where builders may face legal repercussions due to their failure to adhere to regulatory orders, which raises concerns about their operational integrity.

The common reasons observed for the builder’s litigation losses include insufficient justification for project delays, failure to comply with municipal orders, and inadequate fulfillment of contractual obligations with buyers. The verdicts suggest that the builder may have misrepresented project timelines and their adherence to regulatory frameworks, leading to legal failures.

In conclusion, the analysis indicates that buyers should approach Techno Culture Building Centre Private Limited with caution. The patterns emerging from these cases raise concerns about the builder's reliability, especially concerning timely possession and compliance with regulatory requirements. Buyers are advised to be vigilant and thoroughly investigate a builder's legal history and project management practices before making any commitments.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
Suo Motu Complaint … Odisha The respondent, M/s. Techno Culture Building Cent… ["Violation of ORER… {"appellant_claim": "The appellant, ORERA, claime… ORERA Techno Culture Buil… https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/SUO-MOTU-CC-NO.-274-2021.pdf
98 of 2020 Odisha The complainant filed a case against the responde… ["Non-registration … {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… Shahjahan Sheikh Techno Culture Buil… https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/CC.-No.98.20.pdf

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins