CIN | U45200BR2002PTC009767 |
---|---|
Year Established | 25-Feb-02 |
Address | FLAT NO-301/302,THIRD FLOOR,KONARK SHREE APARTMENT H.NO-802/301,BEHIND RBI OFFICE,EXHIBITION ROAD PATNA Patna BR 800001 IN |
Company Status | Private |
In the realm of property development, understanding the track record of builders is crucial for prospective homebuyers. Today, we focus on TECHNOCULTURE BUILDING CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED, a builder based in Odisha, which has been subject to scrutiny due to its legal history. By examining their legal disputes, we aim to provide valuable insights for potential buyers.
TECHNOCULTURE BUILDING CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED has recorded a total of two complaints filed against them, both resulting in losses for the builder. Notably, the builder has not won any legal cases. This lack of favorable outcomes raises concerns regarding their compliance and reliability.
Despite TECHNOCULTURE BUILDING CENTRE's 0 wins, the two cases do illustrate some potential insights:
Based on the analysis of TECHNOCULTURE BUILDING CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED's legal history, it is evident that the builder has significant issues with project delivery and regulatory adherence. The outcomes of the complaints serve as a cautionary reminder for potential buyers searching for reliability and accountability in property developers.
In conclusion, while TECHNOCULTURE BUILDING CENTRE may have its projects in Odisha, the two lost cases indicate serious concerns about their reliability. Future homebuyers should approach with caution and consider the outlined strategies for ensuring a better purchasing experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Techno Culture Building Centre Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, and Penalties for Project Delays.
The first type of cases primarily involved claims from buyers regarding delayed possession of their flats. In one notable case, the complainant alleged that despite paying for a flat, the builder had failed to register the property in their name and had not completed the project on time. The builder's defense revolved around a lack of approval from the Bhubaneswar Development Authority for the project's plans, which indicates a recurring issue with adherence to regulatory requirements. The verdict in this case mandated the builder to fulfill their commitments, highlighting the legal expectation that builders must meet deadlines and complete projects to the satisfaction of buyers.
The second theme, Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, is exemplified by the builder's violation of an order passed by the Odisha Real Estate Regulatory Authority (ORERA). The builder was found guilty of non-compliance, leading to a penalty of Rs. 3,44,000. This case underscores a pattern where builders may face legal repercussions due to their failure to adhere to regulatory orders, which raises concerns about their operational integrity.
The common reasons observed for the builder’s litigation losses include insufficient justification for project delays, failure to comply with municipal orders, and inadequate fulfillment of contractual obligations with buyers. The verdicts suggest that the builder may have misrepresented project timelines and their adherence to regulatory frameworks, leading to legal failures.
In conclusion, the analysis indicates that buyers should approach Techno Culture Building Centre Private Limited with caution. The patterns emerging from these cases raise concerns about the builder's reliability, especially concerning timely possession and compliance with regulatory requirements. Buyers are advised to be vigilant and thoroughly investigate a builder's legal history and project management practices before making any commitments.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Suo Motu Complaint … | Odisha | The respondent, M/s. Techno Culture Building Cent… | ["Violation of ORER… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant, ORERA, claime… | ORERA | Techno Culture Buil… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/SUO-MOTU-CC-NO.-274-2021.pdf |
98 of 2020 | Odisha | The complainant filed a case against the responde… | ["Non-registration … | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Shahjahan Sheikh | Techno Culture Buil… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/CC.-No.98.20.pdf |