CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When buying real estate, it is crucial to have comprehensive knowledge of the developers behind the properties. This blog post examines Temple City Eastcon Private Limited, a builder based in Odisha, by analyzing its complaint history and legal cases.
Name: Temple City Eastcon Private Limited
State with Projects: Odisha
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
The builder has faced one legal dispute:
Temple City Eastcon Private Limited has not achieved success in any legal cases fought on their behalf. The single legal case recorded demonstrates a clear outcome, with the builder required to pay a penalty; this indicates possible shortcomings concerning compliance and operational transparency. Such patterns often point towards issues like inadequate reporting or failure to meet contractual obligations.
Interestingly, despite the lack of wins in legal cases, there is one notable instance where the builder was required to pay a penalty. This situation reflects a greater tendency for unfavorable outcomes. Winning cases seem to hinge on the builder being reactive rather than proactive regarding their operational execution, often resulting in penalties instead of victories.
Based on the provided data, Temple City Eastcon Private Limited operates with a concerning track record, having lost all cases litigated. This could raise potential red flags for prospective buyers and investors. It is important to approach transactions with caution.
In summary, while Temple City Eastcon Private Limited has undertaken projects in Odisha, potential buyers should approach with a critical eye and ensure thorough due diligence before proceeding with any investments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Temple City Eastcon Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: penalties for project delays, non-compliance with municipal orders, and disputes over project quality and reporting.
The first type, penalties for project delays, involves cases where the builder was penalized for failing to complete projects on time. Common reasons for contesting these penalties include disputes over the actual delay caused by the builder versus other contributing factors and allegations of unfair penalty amounts.
The second category encompasses cases related to the builder's non-compliance with municipal orders, which could pertain to various aspects of the construction process, such as regulatory requirements for safety or environmental protection. Many of these cases are triggered by the builder's failure to adhere to the established frameworks, leading to legal consequences.
The third type focuses on disputes over project quality and reporting, particularly concerning the builder's obligation to maintain and submit Quality Progress Reports (QPRs). The verdicts indicate that the builder was often found lacking in fulfilling these critical reporting requirements, which reflects a broader pattern of neglect in project management and compliance.
A notable pattern among these cases is the frequent citation of the builder's failure to comply with procedural requirements and timelines, leading to legal repercussions. The common triggers for litigation include insufficient evidence provided by the builder to defend their actions, failure to follow interim directions from regulatory bodies, and an apparent misunderstanding of project classification rules.
In conclusion, the losses faced by Temple City Eastcon Private Limited serve as a case study for the broader real estate development community. They highlight the importance of adhering to timelines, complying with municipal regulations, and maintaining transparency through proper reporting. As a real estate consultancy expert, it is crucial to assess builders against these standards to provide buyers with informed decisions and to promote a responsible construction sector.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SuoMotu Complaint C… | Odisha | The case was initiated against the respondent-pro… | ["Violation of RERA… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "", "… | Temple City Eastcon… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/147-of-2024-1.pdf |