Temple Tree is a builder operating primarily in Karnataka, with a portfolio that has generated some scrutiny and concern among potential buyers. With a total of 3 complaints filed against them and a 0% success rate in legal proceedings, it is crucial to analyze the circumstances surrounding these cases to make an informed decision.
Legal Case Summary
Cases Filed Against Temple Tree
First Case: The plaintiff alleged that Temple Tree delayed possession of the flat and did not fulfill the agreement's terms. The builder justified the delay citing unforeseen circumstances and incurred litigation expenses. The authority granted the plaintiff compensation for the delay, though no additional damages were awarded.
Second Case: In this instance, the plaintiff again claimed significant delays in possession and the lack of promised amenities. Notably, Temple Tree did not respond to this case, leading to a decision in favor of the plaintiff, with the authority ordering the builder to pay interest and compensation for the delay.
Third Case: Similar to the first, the plaintiff argued for delays in possession and sought compensation. The builder reiterated that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances. The ruling favored the plaintiff, granting compensation for the delay and ordering the builder to deliver possession of the flat.
Analysis of Patterns
Common Factors in Lost Cases
Delay in Possession: Each case brought against Temple Tree involved allegations of delayed possession without clear justification or resolution.
Failure to Respond: In the second case, Temple Tree's lack of response likely contributed to the unfavorable ruling. Their non-appearance in court could indicate either a lack of commitment to customer satisfaction or perhaps internal administrative issues.
Compensation Granted: The authority consistently ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, highlighting a clear pattern of unmet expectations regarding timelines and conditions of the agreements.
Common Factors in Won Cases
Unforeseen Circumstances: In the few cases where Temple Tree provided defenses, they cited unforeseen circumstances as justification for the delays. Although the authority awarded compensation for these delays, it reflects that they were recognized but not fully accepted as legitimate defenses.
Partial Responsibility Accepted: Even in cases where there was some acknowledgment of unforeseen circumstances, the authority directed compensation to be paid to the plaintiffs, indicating that delays were still deemed unacceptable under the terms of the agreement.
Conclusion
Temple Tree's legal troubles highlight significant concerns for potential homebuyers. With three lost cases and no victories in court, buyers must approach projects by Temple Tree with caution. The consistent theme of delayed possession and failure to meet contractual obligations paints a picture of an unreliable company when it comes to fulfilling promises.
Tips for Potential Buyers
Research and Due Diligence: Conduct thorough research on Temple Tree's history, focusing on customer reviews and legal outcomes. This can provide insight into their practices.
Seek Legal Counsel: Before signing any agreements, consider consulting a real estate attorney who can help navigate the terms carefully.
Review Agreements Thoroughly: Ensure all terms, especially concerning possession and amenities, are clearly outlined in contracts.
Explore Alternatives: Given the legal challenges, it may be wise to consider other builders with better reputations and fewer legal complaints.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
Check Credentials and Licensing: Ensure the builder is fully licensed and certified to operate in your area.
Look for Transparency: Builders should be open about their past projects and should provide references.
Evaluate Financial Stability: A financially secure builder may be less likely to experience delays due to funding issues.
Inspect Completed Projects: If possible, visit and assess some of the builder’s completed works to judge quality firsthand.
In conclusion, while Temple Tree does have developments in Karnataka, the legal issues surrounding them are significant and merit caution from potential buyers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. Includes summaries and key takeaways.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Delayed Possession ClaimsFailure to Provide Promised AmenitiesUnforeseen Circumstances Defense
Error
This table provides details of individual cases contributing to the summary above. Click rows to expand content. Use "Show More/Less" buttons below.
Case No.
State
Summary
Topic
Detailed Summary
Appellant
Respondent
Source
CMP/181024/0001489CMP/181024/0001489
KarnatakaKarnataka
The plaintiff filed a complaint against the devel…The plaintiff filed a complaint against the developer for delay in possession of the flat and sought compensation. The authority granted the plaintiff compensation for the delay.
["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Compensation"]
{"appellant_claim": "The plaintiff claimed that t…{"appellant_claim": "The plaintiff claimed that the developer delayed possession of the flat and sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and sought to justify the same.", "final_verdict": "The authority granted the plaintiff compensation for the delay and directed the respondent to give possession of the flat.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
The plaintiff filed a complaint against the devel…The plaintiff filed a complaint against the developer for delay in possession of the flat and non-provision of amenities. The authority allowed the complaint and ordered the developer to pay interest and delay compensation.
["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Non-provision of amenities"]
{"appellant_claim": "The plaintiff claimed that t…{"appellant_claim": "The plaintiff claimed that the developer delayed possession of the flat and did not provide the amenities as promised.", "respondent_claim": "The developer did not appear in the case and did not provide any response.", "final_verdict": "The authority allowed the complaint and ordered the developer to pay interest and delay compensation.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
The plaintiff filed a complaint against the devel…The plaintiff filed a complaint against the developer for delay in possession of the flat and non-implementation of the agreement. The authority granted compensation for delay and interest.
["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Non-implementation of agreement"]
{"appellant_claim": "The plaintiff claimed that t…{"appellant_claim": "The plaintiff claimed that the developer delayed possession of the flat and did not implement the agreement as per the terms.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and that they had incurred litigation expenses.", "final_verdict": "The authority granted compensation for delay and interest, but did not award any additional damages.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}