| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to investing in real estate, understanding a builder's track record is crucial. This blog post takes a closer look at THE CLASSIC DEVELOPERS, analyzing their performance through the lens of legal cases, and offering insights for potential homebuyers.
Legal Background of THE CLASSIC DEVELOPERS
Complaints Overview
THE CLASSIC DEVELOPERS has faced a total of two complaints, reflecting a moderate level of customer concern. In the legal arena, they have won one case while losing another, displaying a mixed record in handling disputes.
Cases Filed Against THE CLASSIC DEVELOPERS
Case Summary - Lost Case
The lone case that resulted in a loss for THE CLASSIC DEVELOPERS involved a respondent who claimed to have submitted the necessary QPRs (Quarterly Progress Reports) and a completion certificate following a notice. The final verdict saw the notice discharged, leading to the dropping of the proceedings. This case suggests a potential communication …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against The Classic Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory non-compliance, penalties for project delays, and disputes over land conversion or classification.
The theme of regulatory non-compliance stands out, particularly in the case where the builder was directed to apply for a subsequent extension for the validity of registration and was penalized for violating the Act. This highlights a pattern of neglect towards legal obligations related to project registrations and approvals, leading to significant financial repercussions.
People commonly brought cases to court to contest the penalties imposed on the builder, which indicates a lack of acceptance or understanding of the regulatory framework surrounding real estate projects. There were also disputes over project delays; however, the summaries suggest that the builder often attributed delays to other parties rather than taking responsibility, which may …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, THE CLASSIC DEVELOPERS, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The primary disputes have been grouped under common themes. One significant theme is 'Compliance with Regulatory Requirements', where issues arise from allegations of non-compliance with municipal regulations or contractual obligations. Another recurring theme is 'Claims of Submission and Documentation', where claimants contest whether the builder has provided adequate documentation, such as quality performance reports (QPRs) or completion certificates. Lastly, 'Disputes over Project Progress and Completion' highlight sellers disputing the alleged status and readiness of the projects for possession.
These cases were often brought to court due to claims contesting penalties, accusations of project delays, or disagreements over compliance with municipal orders and documentation. Patterns emerge from these claims, suggesting that some buyers or regulatory bodies may perceive issues where the builders assert they have complied with …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!