| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding The Hub: A Case Study on Builder Performance and Buyer Considerations
When considering a home purchase, particularly from builders, potential buyers often seek to understand their reliability and performance history. One such builder is The Hub, a company with projects exclusively located in Karnataka. In this post, we'll detail The Hub’s performance based on available data, focusing on their complaints and case outcomes to provide insights for prospective buyers.
Case Overview
To date, The Hub has received 2 complaints against them, both of which have resulted in cases won for the builder. Remarkably, The Hub has a perfect record of 0 cases lost. Despite encountering complaints, the builder has effectively navigated these issues to maintain a strong legal standing.
Legal Cases Summary:
- Blue Waters by SUR Prime Corporation: This project was the subject of both complaints filed against The Hub. In both instances, the appellant …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, The Hub, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
Throughout the reviewed case summaries, a common theme that emerged was centered around delayed possession claims, specifically concerning the project titled 'Blue Waters by SUR Prime Corporation.' In both instances, the opposing party sought claims for interest on delays, suggesting a dissatisfaction with the timelines promised by the builder.
The complaints stemmed from a perceived delay in the project's completion, prompting buyers or stakeholders to demand financial compensation in the form of interest for the inconvenience caused. Various stakeholders, possibly including individual buyers or corporate clients, brought their grievances to court, expecting accountability from The Hub.
The builder won these cases primarily because the complaints were dismissed for non-prosecution. This indicates that the plaintiffs did not meet the necessary procedural requirements or failed to present compelling evidence to substantiate their claims. …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from THE HUB?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.