No Logo Available

THE INDIAN COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Punjab
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder is paramount for prospective homeowners and investors. One such builder, The Indian Cooperative House Building Society Limited, has made its presence felt in the market, particularly in Punjab. However, the builder has faced some challenges, as evidenced by the legal issues it has encountered. In this blog post, we will delve into the details surrounding this builder, analyze its performance in legal matters, and offer insights for potential buyers.

Legal Case Overview

The Indian Cooperative House Building Society Limited has encountered a total of one complaint so far. Here’s a brief overview of the case:

  1. Case Lost: The complaint involved a situation where the complainant alleged that the builder failed to deliver possession of a plot measuring 250 square yards, despite the complainant having paid Rs. 11,25,000 out of the total price of Rs. 22,50,000. The builder countered these allegations, claiming that they did not violate any provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. However, the adjudicating officer determined that they lacked the jurisdiction to grant relief regarding a refund or interest, and thus returned the complaint to the complainant.

Analysis of Legal Performance

Cases Lost

  • Pattern: The sole case lost by The Indian Cooperative House Building Society Limited centers around non-delivery of property despite substantial payments made by the complainant. This points to potential issues in project management or financial liquidity that may hinder timely delivery to clients.

Cases Won

  • Pattern: Interestingly, there are no cases won by this builder in the provided data, indicating that the builder has not yet successfully rebutted a complaint in a legal setting. This raises questions regarding its efficacy in handling disputes and managing customer relations.

Conclusion

The Indian Cooperative House Building Society Limited presents itself as a builder with minimal experience in legal matters, having only faced one complaint leading to a loss. Potential buyers should approach this builder with caution due to the existing complaint and consider the implications of a case that showcases a failure to deliver on promises.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Do Thorough Research: Investigate the builder’s history and gather as much information as possible regarding their previous projects, customer satisfaction, and existing complaints.
  2. Contract Clarity: Ensure that all terms are clear in the contract, specifically regarding timelines for possession and payment schedules.
  3. Financial Stability: Assess the builder’s financial stability to ensure they can complete the project as promised, reducing the risk of delays.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

  • Check Ratings and Reviews: Look for feedback from previous customers to gauge the builder’s reliability and reputation in the market.
  • Verify Legal Compliance: Ensure the builder abides by all relevant regulations and standards in the real estate sector, particularly the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act.
  • Consult Professionals: Engage with real estate professionals to gain insights into the builder's viability and the potential risk of investment.

By equipping yourself with the right knowledge and exercising due diligence, you can make informed decisions when selecting a builder for your future home.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Financial Disputes Compliance with RERA

Analysis of the cases filed against The Indian Cooperative House Building Society Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around three common topics: delayed possession claims, financial disputes, and compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA).

The most significant theme among these cases is the delayed possession claim. In one notable case, the complainant alleged that despite paying a substantial amount of Rs. 11,25,000 out of the total price of Rs. 22,50,000, the builder had failed to deliver possession of a plot measuring 250 square yards. This case highlights a growing concern among buyers regarding the builder's inability to adhere to project timelines and fulfill their commitments.

Financial disputes also emerge as a critical theme in these cases. Often, the controversies revolve around the amounts paid, the total price agreed upon, and the builder's accountability for delivering what was promised. In the case mentioned, the focus was not only on the delayed possession but also on the significant financial investment made by the complainant, which further illustrates the buyer's dissatisfaction.

Lastly, the issue of compliance with RERA is a recurring theme. Builders have an obligation under the RERA to ensure transparency and accountability in their dealings. However, in the cases where The Indian Cooperative House Building Society Limited lost, the common thread was the builder's defense that they had not violated any provisions of the RERA, which implies that either there were misunderstandings regarding the regulations or a lack of evidence to support the builder's claims of compliance.

The reasons people commonly bring cases to court against this builder include contesting what they perceive as delays in project delivery, financial mismanagement, and a lack of adherence to regulatory standards. Patterns emerge that suggest buyers are particularly vigilant about timely possession and transparent financial dealings. Common triggers for litigation include a failure to communicate delivery timelines effectively and unfulfilled financial agreements.

Examining the outcomes of these cases, it is evident that the builder lost primarily due to a lack of evidence to support their claims of timely delivery and compliance with RERA. In some instances, the adjudicating officer's lack of jurisdiction to grant relief further highlighted the builder's inability to resolve disputes satisfactorily through legal means. Overall, these cases serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers, emphasizing the importance of thorough due diligence before making significant financial investments in properties developed by The Indian Cooperative House Building Society Limited.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review