CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive real estate market, the reliability of a builder can significantly affect a buyer's investment. Today, we take an in-depth look at The Pinnacle Welfare Society, a builder operating in Odisha, examining their complaint history and case outcomes.
Overview of Legal Performance
The Pinnacle Welfare Society has a noteworthy legal track record, boasting a total of 4 complaints filed against them. Impressively, they have won all 4 cases with no losses. This perfect success rate in litigation indicates a robust capability to defend their interests and address customer complaints credibly.
Legal Case Details
All four complaints against The Pinnacle Welfare Society dealt with similar issues: defects in the building, failure to provide agreed-upon amenities, and non-return of security deposits. In each case:
- Appellant Claims: Complainants assert that the builder did not rectify defects, failed to deliver amenities as per the agreement, and withheld security …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases largely revolve around three recurring themes: Defective Construction Claims, Amenities Provision Disputes, and Security Deposit Conflicts. In these cases, the builder was accused by complainants of failing to rectify defects in the buildings, not providing the agreed-upon amenities, and not returning the security deposits, elements that are crucial to homebuyers' satisfaction. While these cases appear to be centered on standard expectations of residential properties, the underlying issues often relate to misunderstandings of the builder's obligations and the legal framework governing real estate practices.
The reasons the builder commonly brought these cases to court involved contesting claims that they failed to meet contractual obligations. The builder defended its position by asserting that the construction was completed before the Real Estate Act came into effect, calling into question the applicability of …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from THE PINNACLE WELFARE SOCIETY?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.