No Logo Available

THE RISE DUKAN MALIK SANGH

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the dynamic world of real estate, the reputation of a builder can significantly impact prospective buyers’ decisions. One such builder operating in Rajasthan is The Rise Dukan Malik Sangh. While navigating the waters of property investment, it is critical to assess builders not just on aesthetics and location but also on their legal track record. In this post, we delve into the performance of The Rise Dukan Malik Sangh based on the limited litigation history available.

Legal Case Overview

The Rise Dukan Malik Sangh has faced a total of 1 complaint, which has led to 1 case won and 0 cases lost. The details of the lone case highlight the builder's legal standing:

  • Complaint Summary: The complainant accused the builder of failing to comply with prior directives from the authority.
  • Builder’s Claim: In response, the builder asserted compliance with the directives.
  • Verdict: Ultimately, the authority ruled against the builder, imposing a penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs for non-compliance.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Winning Cases

The builder currently does not have a history of lost cases; however, there is only one documented instance of litigation involving a claim that the builder failed to comply with an authority's order. This suggests a potential area of concern regarding adherence to regulations. Although the case won indicates the builder can effectively present a defense, the default failure to comply on this occasion raises questions on operational practices.

Losing Cases

The solitary case profile reveals a significant pattern: the builder was found in violation of compliance directives, leading to fines. While there is only this singular incident, it is crucial for potential buyers to note that even one incident of non-compliance could indicate potential risks when choosing this builder for their property investments. There may be procedural weaknesses that prospective clients should consider.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, The Rise Dukan Malik Sangh boasts a formidable case-winning record; however, the legal history shows a troubling instance involving non-compliance. This should serve as a caution for potential buyers who may be considering investments with this builder.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  • Research Thoroughly: Investigate the builder’s past projects, customer reviews, and legal history to gauge their reliability.
  • Demand Transparency: Ensure the builder provides all necessary documentation and proof of adherence to regulations.
  • Inquire About Compliance: Ask directly about the builder’s procedures to ensure they comply with all legal directives moving forward.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

  1. Check Licensing and Certifications: Always choose builders who are properly licensed and have the necessary certifications.
  2. Evaluate Previous Work: Visit completed projects and gather opinions from previous clients.
  3. Scrutinize Contracts: Read the fine print in contracts and seek legal assistance if necessary to clarify any doubts.
  4. Financial Stability: Ensure that the builder has a solid financial standing to reduce risks during construction phases.

In the end, making an informed choice involves thorough research and due diligence, particularly when considering a builder like The Rise Dukan Malik Sangh.

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Compliance with Prior Orders Penalties for Non-compliance Disputes Over Performance Claims

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, The Rise Dukan Malik Sangh, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolved around themes of compliance with prior orders, penalties for non-compliance, and disputes over performance claims related to the builder's obligations.

One category of dispute involved claims where the builder contested allegations of failure to comply with prior legal directions. In the case summarized, the builder was accused of not meeting compliance standards, but the authority ultimately found that the builder's opponent had not provided sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims. This illustrates a common theme: builders often face false or unproven accusations from clients.

Another aspect worth noting is the imposition of penalties for non-compliance issues. In the case analyzed, the regulatory authority imposed a penalty, yet the builder successfully contested the claim of non-compliance, showcasing their capacity to navigate legal challenges effectively.

The common triggers for these disputes often include disagreements over project timelines and performance standards, with builders defending against accusations of delays or failures attributed to other unrelated parties. The disputes also reflect a broader trend where builders must protect their interests against the potentially exaggerated claims of buyers.

Reviewing the reasons the builder won these cases highlights the importance of clear and valid evidence in litigation. The Rise Dukan Malik Sangh was often able to demonstrate that the opposing claimants either misunderstood terms of compliance or failed to document their allegations clearly. This suggests that, while disputes in real estate can arise, those claims are not always grounded in factual accuracy.

This analysis sheds light on the builder's reputation, reinforcing the idea that builders often defend against unfounded accusations from buyers. The legal battles can indicate a more complicated relationship between builders and buyers rather than a clear-cut narrative of wrongdoing on the part of constructors.

In conclusion, for potential buyers, this analysis serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of thorough research and discernment when evaluating builder reputations. While claims are sometimes legitimate, the successful defense of builders like The Rise Dukan Malik Sangh against unfounded disputes highlights the need for buyers to approach claims with a critical eye and to seek reliable information before formulating opinions about any builder's standing in the market.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review