THIRUMURUGAN GRAND PROPERTIES

Introduction

Thirumurugan Grand Properties, operating primarily in Tamil Nadu, has come under scrutiny due to its legal challenges, reflecting an important landscape for potential buyers to navigate. With a record of handling complaints and legal disputes, this builder's performance raises questions worth discussing.

Overview of Legal Challenges

Thirumurugan Grand Properties has reported a total of two complaints against it, both resulting in losses for the builder. This indicates a concerning trend that buyers should be aware of when considering a purchase from this developer.

Details of Legal Cases

1. Case Summary
   • Appellant Claim: The complainants sought a refund for amounts paid towards the purchase of plots, citing a violation of the Tamil Nadu Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, specifically Section 12, which pertains to sales processes and legal recourse.
   • Respondent Claim: The builder argued that the sale period had expired as of December 4, 2020. They maintained that the sale deed was to be executed within a stipulated 90 days, which was not fulfilled due to incomplete transactions on the part of the complainants.
   • Final Verdict: The authority ruled in favor of the complainants, directing the builder to issue refunds by February 28, 2022.

This pattern shows that Thirumurugan Grand Properties has consistently faced claims related to refund requests due to perceived delays or complications in executing sale deeds. Both cases demonstrate a clear expectation from buyers about adherence to sales agreements, which the builder failed to meet, resulting in a loss of credibility.

Patterns and Common Factors

Common Factors in Lost Cases

• Refund Requests: All cases lost by Thirumurugan Grand Properties involved refund claims. Buyers expected their investments back due to a failure in the builder's adherence to timelines and sales processes.
• Violation of Real Estate Regulations: Both complaints highlighted violations of the Tamil Nadu Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, indicating that the builder failed to comply with the established regulatory frameworks.

Common Factors in Won Cases

Curiously, although there were claims mentioning that two cases were won, they were not actually won based on favorable outcomes for the builder. Instead, the builder consistently lost cases related to their inability to meet sales period obligations, suggesting that any claim regarding victories should be viewed with skepticism.

Conclusion

In summary, Thirumurugan Grand Properties has faced significant legal challenges, resulting in negative outcomes both in terms of consumer trust and financial liabilities. For potential buyers, it is crucial to weigh this builder's record carefully before making a decision.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Comprehensive Background: Investigate the builder’s track record, including any prior complaints or legal issues.
2. Seek Transparency: Ensure that the builder provides clear timelines and commitments regarding sales and delivery.
3. Utilize Legal Counsel: If considering a purchase, consulting with a real estate lawyer can help you better understand your rights and obligations.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Check Reviews and Complaints: Look for customer reviews on platforms that track consumer experiences.
• Verify Registration and Compliance: Ensure the builder is registered under local regulations and compliant with real estate laws.
• Demand Clarity in Contracts: Ensure all terms regarding payment schedules, refunds, and penalties are well documented.

By keeping these factors in mind, prospective buyers can make more informed decisions in the complex world of real estate. Reading up on Thirumurugan Grand Properties can provide deeper insights into making a choice that aligns with both financial and personal goals.

Analysis of the cases filed against Thirumurugan Grand Properties, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around two main topics: refund claims due to an expired sale period and violations of the Tamil Nadu Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

The first type of case involves the complainants seeking refunds because the sale period had expired on December 4, 2020. They argued that the builder failed to execute the sale deed within the stipulated 90-day period after receiving the balance of the sale consideration. This highlights a common dispute regarding adherence to timelines in real estate transactions.

The second theme centers on the builder's alleged violations of Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Complainants sought not only refunds but also compensation for these legal breaches, indicating a growing awareness among buyers regarding their rights under real estate regulations.

A pattern emerges where buyers commonly bring cases to court primarily due to the builder’s failure to fulfill contractual obligations, particularly concerning timely execution of sale deeds. The builder's defense often revolves around claims of expired sale periods and the buyers' failure to pay the balance within the specified timeframe. However, the underlying reason for the builder's losses in these cases appears to stem from a combination of factors, including insufficient evidence to support their claims, non-compliance with the TN RERA, and possibly a misunderstanding of their obligations under the Act.

The verdicts in both cases mandate refunds of the amounts paid by the complainants, reinforcing the commitment to protecting buyers' interests in the real estate market. These outcomes serve as a cautionary tale for builders, emphasizing the importance of adhering to regulations and meeting contractual requirements to avoid legal repercussions.