| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to choosing a builder for your dream home, understanding their legal history and customer satisfaction levels takes precedence. This blog post dives deep into Tirumala Constructions, analyzing their legal cases, the outcomes, and what potential buyers should consider before making a purchase.
Overview of Tirumala Constructions
Tirumala Constructions is a builder operating in the state of Karnataka. While the company has numerous projects under its belt, it is essential to evaluate its track record in handling disputes and customer complaints.
Complaints and Legal Cases
According to the data, Tirumala Constructions has faced a total of 2 complaints, both resulting in unfavorable outcomes for the builder, as they have lost both cases. These lawsuits highlight issues concerning project registration and authorization, important aspects governed by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, commonly known as the RERA Act.
Breakdown of Legal Cases
Cases Lost
Both cases lost …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Tirumala Constructions, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into its legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: non-compliance with the RERA Act and the authenticity of sale agreements.
The non-compliance with RERA Act theme encompasses cases where the allottees claimed where the builder failed to register the project as required under the RERA Act. This points to a troubling pattern of neglecting regulatory obligations which are established to protect buyers’ rights. The builder's defense often revolved around questioning the authenticity of the allottees rather than addressing the compliance issues directly.
The authenticity of sale agreements is another recurring theme. In multiple cases, the builder claimed that the allottees were not genuine buyers and that the agreements of sale were concocted. This defensive strategy indicates a significant trust issue and possibly a lack of thorough verification during the sale process.
…
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!