CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Tirupati Infra is a builder operating primarily in Gujarat and has recently garnered attention due to some legal challenges. With a record of one complaint filed against them, it's essential for potential buyers to understand the implications attached to their dealings, particularly regarding compliance with essential regulations and how it may impact future projects.
Tirupati Infra has seen one notable legal case filed against them, where they did not manage to win. The case revolved around the appellant's claim that Tirupati Infra failed to submit quarterly reports for their project, Victoria Township, as mandated by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, commonly known as RERA. Tirupati Infra's defense was that they were unaware of these requirements and did not intend to violate them. However, the result was a fine imposed on the builder amounting to Rs. 50,000 for breaching Section 63 of the RERA Act.
The only case Tirupati Infra has lost highlights a concerning pattern regarding their understanding and compliance with regulatory frameworks like RERA. Notably, the inability to submit required reports indicates either a lack of awareness or oversight on the part of the builder. This suggests potential weaknesses in organizational processes that may require addressing to prevent similar issues in the future.
Interestingly, while the record suggests a complaint was lost instead of a won case, it's worth noting that Tirupati Infra has not achieved any wins in legal disputes. This raises a red flag for potential buyers regarding the reliability and operational integrity of the builder.
Based on the available data, Tirupati Infra has faced a complaint that they lost, resulting in a fine. The lack of victories in legal challenges combined with a single complaint shows a potential need for buyers to exercise caution when considering investments in properties developed by this builder.
In conclusion, while Tirupati Infra operates in the real estate sector in Gujarat, the existing legal complications prompt potential investors to proceed with due diligence and caution.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Tirupati Infra, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across their legal disputes.
The primary theme in these cases is Regulatory Non-compliance. Many of the disputes revolved around the builder's failure to adhere to the requirements set forth by the RERA Act. Many of the claims made by the appellants highlight the importance of compliance in the real estate sector, demonstrating an emerging pattern where builders are held accountable for their obligations under the law.
Another significant theme is the Failure to Submit Mandatory Reports. In one notable case, the builder was fined for not submitting quarterly reports for their project, Victoria Township. This reflects a broader issue seen with builders who may either be unaware of or choose to ignore their reporting responsibilities, leading to legal consequences.
The reasons people commonly bring cases against Tirupati Infra primarily include contesting penalties imposed for non-compliance and regulatory breaches. There is also a pattern of disputes arising from the builder's lack of diligence with procedural requirements, which further aggravates their legal position.
The builder’s losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors. Notably, their defense often stems from a claimed lack of awareness about legal requirements, which emphasizes a failure in understanding their obligations rather than willful disobedience. However, this lack of awareness does not excuse their non-compliance, leading to legal repercussions. Additionally, the builder's failure to provide necessary documentation and reports when required results in insufficient evidence to support their claims, ultimately leading to legal defeat.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
580R-85/2018 | Gujarat | The promoter, Tirupati Infra, was fined for not s… | ["Non-compliance of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Tirupati Infra | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1EBBRgSnHTlQaDwiclDdHuLFHgUPSnpD_ |