CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Todi Constructions Private Limited operates primarily in West Bengal, focusing on residential projects. However, prospective buyers should be aware of some significant legal issues surrounding the builder that may influence their purchasing decisions.
With a total of 4 complaints lodged against Todi Constructions, the company has not won any cases. Instead, all 4 cases were lost, showcasing a trend of unfavorable outcomes in legal disputes.
Examining the legal case details, it’s clear there are troubling patterns:
In all 4 cases lost, the recurring themes include:
Interestingly, while Todi Constructions has not won any cases, the outcomes have shown that their claims for more time to comply with orders did not result in successful defenses. Instead, the Authority's rulings leaned heavily in favor of the complainants, thus highlighting weaknesses in Todi’s operational and customer service strategies.
Based on the data, Todi Constructions Private Limited presents a concerning profile for potential buyers. With a 100% loss rate in legal disputes, it reflects a lack of commitment to completing projects and addressing customer grievances effectively. For anyone considering investing in a property from Todi Constructions, it's pivotal to proceed with extreme caution.
In summary, while Todi Constructions Private Limited has plenty of projects in West Bengal, the legal troubles faced by the builder indicate potential risks for buyers. Proceeding with caution and diligence is essential for anyone thinking about investing in their offerings.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Todi Constructions Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily revolved around delayed possession claims and the builder's failure to refund amounts paid by the complainants.
Many of the cases involved claims from buyers who had paid significant amounts for flats in projects like 'Sunny Crest' and yet faced delays in possession. These claims often sought refunds of the principal amount paid along with compensation and interest, indicating a serious concern about the builder's ability to adhere to timelines and fulfill contractual obligations.
A common thread among these cases was the builder's consistent failure to provide refunds as mandated by earlier authority orders. The builder repeatedly sought extensions of time to comply with these orders, which reflects a troubling trend of non-compliance with legal directives. The authority's decision to involve the District Magistrate to execute the orders highlights the builder's unfulfilled commitments and the necessity for external intervention to uphold the rights of buyers.
The reasons people brought cases to court primarily revolved around the financial and emotional distress caused by delayed possession and the builder's unresponsiveness to their claims for refunds and compensation. The patterns emerging from these summaries indicate that buyers felt aggrieved due to a combination of financial losses and unmet expectations in terms of timely delivery of their purchased properties.
The builder lost these cases chiefly due to their inability to meet the obligations set forth in their contracts and failure to adhere to the authority's orders. Insufficient evidence of compliance or valid reasons for delays, coupled with a lack of transparency in their dealings, likely contributed to the adverse outcomes. Furthermore, the repeated requests for more time to fulfill their commitments suggest a systemic issue within the company's operational capabilities or project management practices.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!