CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Transcon Sheth Creators Private Limited is a well-known name operating primarily in Maharashtra. As with many builders in the region, they have faced legal challenges, which can often influence buyer decisions. In this blog, we will delve into the builder's legal history, including the number of complaints and the outcomes of legal cases, to give potential buyers a clearer understanding of what to expect.
The builder has had a total of 1 complaint registered against them. Notably, they have lost 1 case, with no cases won. This paints a somewhat concerning picture regarding the builder's legal standing. The single complaint could indicate a potential issue relating to customer satisfaction or contractual agreements, suggesting that due diligence before purchasing is vital.
The legal case associated with Transcon Sheth Creators involves an appeal for condoning a delay in filing. Here’s a brief summary:
This case indicates that while a delay in action was permitted, it also implies a level of scrutiny over the builder's processes and how they may deal with complaints.
From the available data, there is only one case that has been lost by Transcon Sheth Creators. The nature of this case highlights delays as a significant factor. Delays in response times or appeals can suggest inefficiencies within the company's operational procedures, possibly leading to dissatisfaction from clients who expect timely resolutions.
Interestingly, the builder has not won any legal battles, which raises questions about their legal strategies and customer service practices. Although they managed to have the delay condoned in the one case, the outcome still led to additional costs, implying a negotiation rather than a definitive legal win.
In concluding the assessment of Transcon Sheth Creators Private Limited, the current data suggests that potential buyers should approach with caution. The absence of wins in legal cases and the fact that they had to condone a significant delay may hint at some challenges with compliance and responsiveness to clients’ needs.
In summary, while Transcon Sheth Creators have begun to establish a presence in Maharashtra’s real estate market, the concerns raised by their legal history warrant careful consideration by potential buyers.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Transcon Sheth Creators Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Intentional Delay Disputes.
The first type of case often revolves around the builder's failure to deliver property on time, which is a recurring issue in real estate transactions. These cases typically involve the buyer or investor seeking compensation or relief due to the delay. In the context of Transcon Sheth, the focus was on whether the delay was intentional or justified, highlighting the importance of clear communication and adherence to timelines in real estate projects.
The second theme, Intentional Delay Disputes, reflects the builder's opposition to claims made by the other party, where the builder argued that delays were not only significant but also intentional. This indicates a level of distrust between the parties involved and often stems from misunderstandings or miscommunications regarding project timelines and expectations.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties imposed for delays, disputing the builder's accountability for project slowdowns, and disagreements over the classification of delays as intentional or otherwise. A pattern emerges where the builder’s litigation often centers around their attempt to defend against claims of negligence or intentional wrongdoing, rather than addressing the root causes of delays.
The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors. Notably, the tribunal's decision to condone a delay of 78 days—albeit with costs—suggests that while the builder's defenses may not have been entirely inadequate, they were certainly insufficient to overturn the claims made against them. This highlights the need for builders to ensure compliance with legal timelines, maintain transparent communications, and provide valid reasoning for any delays to avoid similar legal repercussions.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!