Analysis of the cases filed against Trehan Home Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes faced by the builder. The cases could be broadly categorized into three topics: delayed possession claims, disputes over project completion and handover, and penalties for non-compliance and project delays.

The first category, delayed possession claims, accounted for a substantial number of cases. In these instances, buyers claimed that the builder had failed to deliver possession of their flats within the agreed-upon timeframe. The builder, in their defense, often cited external factors such as demonetization and raw material shortages as contributing to the delays. However, as evidenced by the verdicts, the adjudicating officer did not accept these defenses and awarded compensation to the claimants, indicating a degree of disfavor towards the builder's justifications.

The second category involved disputes primarily concerning the completion and handover of projects. Buyers alleged that they were not provided with possession of their flats despite having made full payments and obtaining registered sale deeds. In one notable case, the builder claimed to have handed over physical possession, yet the complaint resulted in a direction to provide a possession certificate, highlighting a systemic issue with documentation and communication from the builder’s side.

The final category revolved around penalties imposed on the builder for various reasons, such as failing to inform buyers about the project status and delays in completing projects within the registration validity period. In one case, a penalty of Rs. 5,000 was imposed for non-compliance, demonstrating the regulatory challenges faced by the builder.

A pattern emerges from these summaries: buyers commonly contested delays in possession, discrepancies in project completion notifications, and penalties that they felt were unjust or not addressed adequately by the builder. The builder's repeated losses in these cases suggest several failure points, including insufficient evidence to support their claims of timely possession and project completion, a lack of compliance with regulatory requirements, and a general inability to meet the expectations set during the purchase agreements.

Overall, this analysis indicates that potential buyers should exercise caution when considering Trehan Home Developers Private Limited. The high volume of disputes and the builder’s poor track record in resolving these issues satisfactorily highlight significant risks associated with delivery timelines and the builder's operational practices.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Trehan Home Developers Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes encompassed a couple of common themes, including 'Project Completion Compliance' and 'Registration Validity and Extensions'. These themes emerged from various cases where the appellant contested the builder's timeliness and compliance with municipal regulations.

The types of cases brought against the builder primarily revolved around claims of non-completion of projects within the validity of registration and disagreements over completion certificates. Buyers and regulatory bodies filed complaints alleging that the builder had not completed the project on time, or failed to renew project registration, leading to a perceived impact on buyers' rights and expectations.

A noticeable pattern emerged where the reason behind such complaints often stemmed from misunderstandings or misinterpretations of the project's progress and the legal requirements concerning completion. Each case reflects a challenge faced by buyers who may have held assumptions about project statuses without clear evidence or full knowledge of legal processes involved.

The common factors leading to the builder's victories in these cases included the submission of valid completion certificates, proof of timely extensions of registration, and showing adherence to relevant regulations. The court dismissed claims primarily based on insufficient evidence or misunderstandings presented by the opposing parties. This situation emphasizes the builder's capability to navigate through legalities successfully, often countering exaggerated or unfounded claims made against them.

This analysis conveys an important message regarding the builder’s reputation within the real estate market. It showcases that while there are certainly legitimate disputes out there, Trehan Home Developers Private Limited has efficiently defended itself against accusations that lacked merit. It highlights that buyers sometimes make hasty allegations which can lead to unwarranted legal confrontations.

To potential buyers, it is crucial to approach claims about builders with caution. The real estate market is intricate, and one must be diligent in gathering reliable information before forming an opinion about a builder's credibility. While it's essential to recognize when issues are genuine, it is equally important to understand that builders like Trehan Home Developers Private Limited may often find themselves in legal disputes stemming from unfounded claims. Hence, making informed decisions when engaging with real estate professionals is paramount.