CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When considering a builder for your next property investment, it’s essential to conduct thorough research to ensure that you make informed decisions. In this blog post, we will analyze Trimurti Construction, a builder that operates in Chhattisgarh, and discuss its legal history and customer feedback based on available data.
Trimurti Construction stands out in Chhattisgarh's construction scene, but like many builders, it has faced its share of challenges. Notably, there has been 1 complaint filed against the builder. While this may seem relatively low, it is important to delve deeper into the specifics of the complaint and legal outcomes to gauge the builder's reliability and reputation.
Trimurti Construction has a record of 1 case won and 1 case lost. Let's break down the details:
Based on the information:
Based on the provided data, Trimurti Construction shows some concerning trends. Their solitary loss due to non-compliance with regulations raises red flags for potential buyers. Furthermore, not having any cases won places the builder in a position where they might struggle to defend their practices efficiently.
In conclusion, while Trimurti Construction has potential in the Chhattisgarh market, their current legal standing prompts necessary caution for potential buyers. In any building investment, ensure that due diligence is your foremost priority.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Trimurti Construction, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory compliance disputes, delayed possession claims, and project delay attributions.
The primary theme of regulatory compliance disputes centers around the builder's alleged failure to adhere to established regulations. In one significant case, the appellant claimed that Trimurti Construction had not complied with the necessary regulations, while the builder countered that they had fulfilled all regulatory requirements. The verdict in this case favored the appellant, indicating a shortcoming on the builder's part that could potentially raise concerns for prospective buyers about their commitment to legal and safety standards.
Delayed possession claims are another recurring theme in the cases against Trimurti Construction. Although the specifics of delayed possession were not detailed in the summaries, it is important to note that delays in delivering units to buyers is a common grievance in real estate transactions. Buyers often rely on timely possession for various personal and professional reasons, and a pattern of delays can significantly undermine trust in a builder.
The project delay attributions theme encapsulates disputes over who bears the responsibility for delays in project completion. Buyers may contest penalties imposed by builders for delays that the buyers believe are attributable to other factors beyond their control. Alternatively, builders may dispute claims that they are responsible for significant delays. The case summaries indicate a pattern where buyers contest the builder's attributions of blame, often leading to legal action.
A common trigger for the builder's litigation appears to be their defense against claims of non-compliance and delays. The builder consistently maintains that they have adhered to regulations and fulfilled their obligations, yet the outcomes of the cases suggest otherwise. This discrepancy may indicate a systemic issue within the builder's operations or a lack of effective communication regarding their compliance practices.
The reasons for Trimurti Construction's losses in these cases seem to stem from several factors, most notably insufficient evidence to support their claims of regulatory compliance and adequate project management. The builder's failure to convince the court of their position suggests that they may not have met the required standards, ultimately leading to legal consequences.
In conclusion, the analysis of Trimurti Construction's legal disputes serves as a cautionary tale for potential buyers. It highlights the importance of thoroughly vetting a builder's reputation, especially concerning regulatory compliance and their track record with timely possession and project management. Buyers should conduct detailed research, seek direct testimonials from previous buyers, and engage real estate professionals to make informed decisions before committing to a purchase.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
334-(A00-202-0590) | Chhattisgarh | Chhattisgarh RERA filed a case against Trimurti C… | ["Project Dispute"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Chhattisgarh RERA | Trimurti Constructi… | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-COM-2021-01590/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_cc47f59a-3fcf-4c5f-a998-813bf860edbe.pdf |