No Logo Available

TRIMURTY ARIANA MUTUAL WELFARE SOCIETY

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Understanding the Track Record of Trimurty Ariana Mutual Welfare Society: A Comprehensive Review

When it comes to investing in real estate, prospective buyers often look beyond the initial offerings to delve into a builder's reputation and past performance. Trimurty Ariana Mutual Welfare Society, a builder based in Rajasthan, has garnered attention from the buyer community, yet their history reveals crucial insights into the outcomes faced in legal disputes. This blog post aims to analyze their track record, drawing from available data and reviewing key case findings.

Overview of Complaints and Legal Standing

Trimurty Ariana Mutual Welfare Society has experienced a total of 2 complaints against them, both of which resulted in losses for the builder. It's essential to examine these cases to understand the nature of the complaints and the builder’s operational integrity.

Legal Case Breakdown

The provided details include two notable legal cases:

  1. In the first case, the appellant …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Maintenance Charge Disputes Nuisance Claims Compliance with Agreement for Sale

Analysis of the cases filed against Trimurty Ariana Mutual Welfare Society, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and insights into their disputes.

The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: Maintenance Charge Disputes, Nuisance Claims, and Compliance with Agreement for Sale. Each of these themes highlights common grievances faced by the builder and the other parties involved in the project.

The primary reason for litigation in these cases was the builder's claim that the respondents had defaulted on their maintenance charges. This was often coupled with allegations of nuisance, asserting that the respondents were disturbing the peace in the project. The respondents, on the other hand, consistently claimed compliance with their payment obligations and contested the nuisance allegations, stating they had caused no disruption.

A pattern emerges from these summaries: the builder frequently attributed project disruptions and financial losses to the respondents, while the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review

Interested in buying from TRIMURTY ARIANA MUTUAL WELFARE SOCIETY?

Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.