| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive real estate market, choosing the right builder can significantly influence the investment journey. Trishla Developers, operating primarily in Punjab, provides a unique case study of builder performance in legal disputes. This blog post delves into the builder's track record concerning complaints, legal outcomes, and offers insights for prospective buyers.
Trishla Developers: Overview
Trishla Developers has accumulated a total of 21 complaints, showcasing a notable legal activity. The company has successfully resolved 20 cases, with only 1 case lost, indicating a generally favorable disposition towards their legal standing. The legal battles have emerged predominantly from maintenance charge disputes—a critical area that potential buyers should closely monitor.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost by Trishla Developers
- Total Cases Lost: 1
- Common Factors: The lost case stemmed from non-registration of the project with the appropriate authority. This suggests a significant risk in transactions involving unregistered …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Trishla Developers, which it lost, reveals several important insights into its legal challenges and the recurring themes in its disputes. Broadly categorizing these cases, we can identify three main themes: Regulatory Compliance Issues, Outstanding Fee Disputes, and Project Registration Challenges.
- Regulatory Compliance Issues: Many of the builder's cases stemmed from failures to comply with required regulations, notably the lack of project registration with the relevant authorities. This substantial oversight led to dismissals on the grounds of non-maintainability of complaints, as seen in the case where the builder sought payment for maintenance charges but could not press forward due to the unregistered status of the project.
- Outstanding Fee Disputes: The builder frequently sought payment for outstanding maintenance charges, often coupled with claims for interest and litigation costs. Such disputes indicate tensions between the builder's financial management and customer expectations, likely …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Trishla Developers, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolve around key themes, showing a consistent reliance on legal action in specific areas.
The first theme is the 'Withdrawal of Complaints,' where several complainants opted to withdraw their complaints, typically indicating that the issues had been resolved out of court. The second theme involves 'Non-payment of Maintenance Charges.' Many cases have centered around the failure of respondents to pay their maintenance fees, resulting in court orders directing payment. The 'Claims for Dues and Charges' theme reflects disputes over additional payments related to late payment charges and other dues, often leading to the builder being directed to receive sums due along with interest. Finally, 'Responses and Non-compliance by Respondents' highlights the lack of replies or defenses presented by the respondents, which often favored Trishla Developers in the court's decisions.
…
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Trishla Developers, which the builder won, revealed the following insights. The cases predominantly revolved around two common themes: claims of delayed possession and regulatory non-compliance. In both summaries, the opposing parties alleged that possession of properties was not delivered as promised, indicating a recurring issue that buyers often cite in disputes with builders. Additionally, the claims highlighted the lack of registration with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, suggesting a significant concern among buyers regarding regulatory compliance of builders in the real estate market.
The complaints were brought to court largely due to buyers feeling they were wronged - specifically, over the possession of their properties which they believed was not handed over on time. This highlights a pattern where buyers claim delays or non-delivery, frequently leading to disputes that escalate to legal action. Such claims can arise from misunderstandings about the …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from TRISHLA DEVELOPERS?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.