CIN | U45400DL2006PTC150448 |
---|---|
Year Established | 1-Jul-06 |
Address | E-26, LGF PANCHSHEEL PARK NEW DELHI DL 110017 IN |
Company Status | Private |
In the real estate market, it is crucial for potential buyers to understand the reputation and reliability of builders before making significant investments. One such builder is TS Realtech Private Limited, which has a limited, but notable, legal history concerning its projects and operations in Haryana. In this blog post, we will delve into the complaints filed against TS Realtech, examine the outcomes of these cases, and provide insights for potential buyers.
TS Realtech Private Limited has faced a total of 2 complaints. Unfortunately for the builder, they have lost both cases, resulting in no favorable verdicts. This raises concerns about their accountability and reliability in fulfilling commitments to buyers.
The two cases against TS Realtech involved similar claims from appellants:
While both cases against TS Realtech resulted in losses for the builder, they share a critical aspect: the lack of counterclaims from the respondents. The dismissals being classified as withdrawn implies that the issues raised might have been resolved informally before reaching a robust conclusion in a courtroom setting. This trend highlights a potential pattern where claims do not lead to legal advances, which could point to either a disengagement on the part of complainants or a frustrating experience predicated upon unresolved grievances.
In this scenario, it is essential to acknowledge that TS Realtech has not won any cases. Consequently, there are no patterns or insights to draw from a track record of victories. This absence of successful resolutions in court emphasizes the seriousness of the builder's legal troubles.
Overall, the legal standing of TS Realtech Private Limited raises significant red flags for prospective buyers. With two lost cases and a total of no cases won, it paints a picture of a builder who has struggled to address or resolve customer complaints satisfactorily. This lack of a successful defense in legal disputes will likely weigh heavily on the minds of potential buyers considering investment in their properties.
If you're considering purchasing a property from TS Realtech, or any builder reflecting a similar legal background, keep the following tips in mind:
Outside of TS Realtech specifically, here are some general tips applicable to selecting a builder:
Purchasing property is often one of the most significant financial commitments individuals will make. It is imperative to vet builders, like TS Realtech, carefully, considering their legal history, reliability, and customer satisfaction metrics. By doing adequate research and following sound advice, buyers can reduce their risks and make informed purchasing decisions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against TS Realtech Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key points across the two main disputes.
The primary theme in these cases revolves around "Settlement Disputes." Both cases highlighted the appellants' claim that a settlement had been reached between the parties involved. However, the builder did not counter these claims with any evidence of their own or any defense, leading to the dismissal of the appeals as withdrawn. This pattern indicates that one of the most common triggers for litigation in this builder's experience is the failure to uphold or honor agreed-upon settlements.
The reasons for bringing these cases to court seem to center around the appellants' attempt to enforce the terms of the settlements. Since the builder did not provide any claims or defenses, it can be inferred that they may have been unable to fulfill their commitments, which is a repeated pattern in these disputes.
Examining the outcomes reveals that the builder lost these cases primarily due to their lack of response or defense. This could stem from several factors, such as insufficient evidence to support their position, a failure to comply with the terms of the settlements, or simply a misunderstanding of their obligations under the agreements. The common factor in the verdicts suggests a concerning trend where the builder’s inaction may indicate a broader issue with operational practices or legal compliance, which could impact the trust placed by home buyers and investors.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Appeal No. 466 of 2… | Haryana | The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn due to a se… | ["Settlement", "Wit… | {"appellant_claim(in detail)": "The appellants cl… | Mr. Sandeep Sharma | TS Real Tech Privat… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTU0MjQx |