TULIP INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

TULIP INFRATECH Private Limited operates in the Haryana region, primarily focused on real estate development. However, like many builders, it has faced scrutiny through legal complaints. In this article, we’ll explore the legal history of TULIP INFRATECH, analyze the outcomes of various cases, and provide essential tips for potential buyers.

Legal History Overview

TULIP INFRATECH has encountered a total of 14 complaints, with 10 cases won and 4 cases lost. This indicates a relatively strong outcome for the builder despite the legal challenges it has faced.

Cases Filed and Outcomes

1. Cases Where the Builder Won: TULIP INFRATECH has successfully defended itself in 4 cases. Most notably:
• The builder had disputes regarding additional charges such as the Infrastructure and Facilities Maintenance Charge (IFMS). In several instances, the Authority found that these charges were not part of the buyers' agreements and directed TULIP to issue updated account …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases brought forward by TULIP INFRATECH Private Limited largely revolve around themes such as 'Delayed Possession Claims' and disputes emanating from 'Builder Buyer Agreements'. In essence, the common scenario involved buyers seeking possession of properties or shops after making partial payments, whereas the builder contended that resolving such issues should occur through the formal remedies outlined in the agreements signed by both parties.

This indicates a recurring pattern in which the builder files cases primarily to contest claims from buyers looking to expedite possession or refunds, often citing agreements as the basis for their actions. Furthermore, the builder appears to engage in litigation to protect its rights against claims that may be unjust or not grounded in the contractual agreements that govern these transactions.

The reasons for the builder's success in these …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, TULIP INFRATECH Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into several common themes, including Delayed Possession Claims, Refund and Compensation Disputes, Time-Barred Complaints, and General Non-Prosecution Cases.

1. Delayed Possession Claims: In particular cases, complainants claimed that they booked flats but experienced delays in possession delivery. However, detailed examinations revealed that these claims were premature, as the builder had provided timelines that had yet to lapse, and in some cases, the necessary construction work was completed, including the application for the occupation certificate.
2. Refund and Compensation Disputes: A recurring theme was based on requests for refunds related to HVAT amounts. In these instances, the builder contesting these claims pointed out time limitations and argued that the complaints were lodged too late, often resulting in dismissals of the claims on …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis