| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding Tupe Developers: A Look at Complaints, Legal Outcomes, and Buyer Considerations
Tupe Developers, operating primarily in Maharashtra, has faced a total of 30 complaints, which has led to a notable involvement in legal cases—12 of which were won and 18 lost. This article aims to provide a detailed overview of the legal challenges faced by the builder, identify patterns in their legal outcomes, and offer valuable insights for potential buyers considering a purchase from Tupe Developers.
Overview of Legal Cases
Cases Lost by Tupe Developers
Tupe Developers encountered significant challenges in 18 legal cases, consistently facing issues related to jurisdiction. In these cases, the appellants argued that the Authority, which issued directions to the builder, lacked jurisdiction to do so concerning civil disputes between parties. The common thread in these cases shows that Tupe Developers' compliance with the Authority's directions was a recurring issue, with judges consistently ruling in …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Tupe Developers, which it lost, reveals insights into the common themes and patterns observed throughout the disputes involving the builder. The cases can be grouped into several recurring themes that reflect the primary areas of contention.
- Authority Jurisdiction Disputes: A significant number of cases focused on challenges to the jurisdiction of the Authority involved in the disputes. The builder often claimed that the Authority had no jurisdiction to address civil issues between the parties, emphasizing the illegitimacy of the directions issued against them. Despite these claims, the legal outcomes consistently reinforced the Authority's jurisdiction and the necessity for compliance with its directives.
- Regulatory Compliance Issues: The builder disputed directions issued by MahaRERA, arguing they were without jurisdiction and contrary to their Development Agreement. However, the regulatory framework established by MahaRERA was justified as crucial for maintaining order …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Tupe Developers, which it won, revealed the following information.
The disputes primarily revolve around two significant themes: Authority Jurisdiction Claims and Unfair Practices Allegations.
In the first theme, multiple cases highlighted claims that the Authority lacked jurisdiction to issue directions regarding compliance under the Act.
However, the builder successfully argued that the Authority indeed has the jurisdiction, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.
The second theme involves disputes where the appellants alleged that the respondents committed unfair practices and gross irregularities.
Despite the seriousness of these allegations, Tupe Developers consistently maintained that such practices did not occur, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals and the upholding of prior orders.
These cases provide insight into why Tupe Developers brought these matters before the court. Common reasons include contesting penalties, disputing project delays attributed to other parties, and addressing accusations of …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from TUPE DEVELOPERS?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.