| CIN | AAP-8374 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Unit 1002, 10th Floor, JetAirways Godrej BKC,Plot C-68, G Block, Bandra (East), Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India - 400051 |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
Navigating the real estate market can often feel overwhelming, especially when it comes to selecting the right builder. One such builder that has come under scrutiny is Turf Estate Joint Venture LLP. This post delves into the performance and legal standing of Turf Estate, providing potential buyers with vital information.
Builder Overview
Name: Turf Estate Joint Venture LLP
Number of Complaints: 4
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 4
States with Projects: Maharashtra
Turf Estate operates in Maharashtra and has faced significant legal challenges in recent times. The statistics indicate that this builder has not won any cases pertaining to complaints against them, leading to further inquiry into the reasons behind these outcomes.
Legal Case Details
Despite the nature of legal disputes often being multifaceted, a look into the cases filed against Turf Estate allows us to identify patterns. In total, four legal cases were noted:
- The appellants claimed delay …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Turf Estate Joint Venture LLP, where the builder lost, reveals several key points of interest. The primary theme across all cases was the builder's repeated reliance on delay condonation claims. This indicates that one of the most significant challenges faced by the builder was adherence to project timelines and hearing schedules.
The common reason people brought cases to court in this instance was primarily to seek extensions or condonations for delays in their hearings. There was a pattern of the builder failing to meet the required timelines, leading to multiple applications for delay condonation—a factor that likely contributed to the builder's losses in these cases.
The builder's defense in these cases was minimal, as the respondents did not counterclaim or defend; they simply allowed the builder's applications to be considered. However, the builder’s consistent need to apply for delay condonations suggests systemic issues with …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from TURF ESTATE JOINT VENTURE LLP?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.