| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When considering a builder for your real estate investment, it's crucial to examine their track record, including the number of complaints and legal disputes. Uday Developers, operating primarily in Gujarat, has faced a number of lawsuits, complaints, and resolutions that provide valuable insights for potential buyers.
Legal Performance Overview
Uday Developers has been involved in a total of 21 complaints, out of which they have successfully won 11 cases and lost 10 cases. The outcomes of these cases illustrate various patterns that reflect the builder's legal standing and business practices.
Cases Lost: Common Patterns
Among the 5 cases that Uday Developers filed and lost, a recurring theme emerged. The complainants consistently alleged that the builder misappropriated funds and engaged in unfair trade practices. In these instances, the authority generally ruled in favor of the complainants, emphasizing the absence of evidence to support Uday Developers' claims …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Uday Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes, particularly concerning their project, Galaxy Homes. The cases highlight three recurring themes: non-compliance with RERA and municipal orders, failure to obtain necessary permissions and certificates, and disputes over the issuance of the occupancy certificate.
The first type of case revolves around the builder's failure to comply with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and other municipal regulations. In multiple instances, the complainants asserted that the builder did not register the project with RERA, which is a legal requirement for all real estate projects. This non-compliance exposes buyers to risks, as RERA serves to protect the interests of homebuyers and ensure the accountability of builders.
The second theme involves the builder's inability or reluctance to secure necessary permissions and certificates for the project. The occupancy certificate is critical, as it indicates that …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Uday Developers, which it ultimately lost, reveals several critical insights into their legal challenges and recurring themes.
Misappropriation of Funds:
A common thread throughout the cases is the allegation of financial impropriety, with the complainants consistently claiming that Uday Developers siphoned off money from projects. Whether through direct allegations of cheating or indirect references to mismanagement, this theme underscores a perception of financial mismanagement associated with the builder's activities.
Partnership Disputes:
Many claims emerged from disputes within the partnership framework of the builder. Respondents frequently countered the allegations by stating that the complainants received undue benefits and were, therefore, not aggrieved parties. This indicates an underlying tension in how partnerships were managed and perceived by both the builder and their partners, highlighting complexities in internal relationships.
Claims of Cheating:
A substantial number of the cases …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder Uday Developers, which it won, revealed the following information.
The disputes primarily revolve around two significant themes: unfair trade practices and non-compliance with regulatory requirements.
The predominant category of disputes relates to allegations of unfair trade practices and financial misappropriation.
Multiple cases were brought to challenge claims from the Samawalas, who alleged that Uday Developers engaged in these practices.
However, the decisions in these cases indicate a recurring pattern of the builder successfully contesting such allegations, leading to the cancellation of the complainants' registrations without punitive action against Uday Developers.
Additionally, there were disputes related to the regulatory non-compliance concerning the project "Galaxy Homes."
Here, the complainants cited the absence of necessary permissions and occupancy certificates, which were critical for the legality of the project's completion.
In this instance, while the authority mandated correctives, …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder Uday Developers, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
Compliance with RERA Regulations
One of the significant themes emerging from these cases is the disputes related to compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, commonly known as RERA. In the first case, the Galaxy Homes society claimed that Uday Developers violated the RERA Act by failing to register the project on time. However, Uday Developers successfully demonstrated that the project was completed and handed over before the RERA Act was implemented in 2016. This case highlights the complexities surrounding the timing of project completion and the application of regulatory requirements.
Allegations of Fraud or Embezzlement
The second case involved allegations from complainants who accused the builder of cheating and embezzling funds to gain unreasonable financial benefits. Uday Developers defended itself by stating that the …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from UDAY DEVELOPERS?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.