Analysis of the cases filed against Uma Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: non-compliance with reporting requirements and penalties for project delays and non-submission of documentation.

The first theme encompasses issues related to the builder's failure to adhere to mandatory reporting rules. For instance, in the case of the project 'Uma Darshan,' the builder was fined for not submitting quarterly reports as required by law. The builder's defense—that the violation was due to a lack of sufficient knowledge—highlights an important pattern: many disputes in these cases revolve around the builder's misunderstanding of or inability to comply with regulatory requirements.

The second theme involves penalties imposed on the builder for delays in project completion and failure to provide necessary documentation. In one case, the promoters were ordered to pay penalties ranging from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 4,90,000 for not submitting final reports on their completed projects. This indicates a troubling trend where the builder has faced scrutiny not only for non-compliance with reporting obligations but also for significant delays in fulfilling project requirements.

Common reasons for the builder’s litigation losses include insufficient knowledge of legal requirements, failure to comply with reporting rules, and delays in project completion. These patterns suggest systemic issues within the builder's operations, possibly related to project management or regulatory compliance practices. The repeated imposition of penalties highlights the need for buyers to exercise caution when considering projects managed by Uma Developers, as these legal challenges could impact the builder's reliability and the timely delivery of projects.

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Uma Developers, which it lost, reveals some concerning trends regarding its operational practices and compliance with real estate regulations.

The primary theme that emerges from the case summaries is 'Regulatory Non-compliance.' In this regard, the builder faced specific issues surrounding the sale of units prior to obtaining necessary registrations under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. This particular case illustrates fundamental compliance failures that have led to regulatory penalties, fundamentally undermining the builder's credibility and operational integrity.

Further analysis shows that Uma Developers commonly brought cases to court primarily to contest penalties relating to their improper sales activities. The builder appeared to challenge the regulatory authority's interpretation of the law, particularly in relation to the timeline around obtaining registration for projects. This indicates a potential pattern where the builder might have misjudged the significance of adherence to the regulatory framework, leading them into legal disputes.

Common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases largely stem from insufficient legal grounding in their claims. Specifically, failing to demonstrate compliance with established legal obligations, such as securing necessary registrations prior to selling property units, played a pivotal role in the verdicts against them. Additionally, a lack of thorough understanding of legal provisions concerning real estate regulations and serious oversights in following prescribed processes contributed to their defeats. This underscores the importance of regulatory awareness and adherence for builders in the real estate sector.

In conclusion, the cases against Uma Developers serve as cautionary tales for potential buyers. They highlight the risks associated with engaging with builders who may not strictly comply with regulatory statutes. Prospective homeowners should prioritize due diligence regarding builder reputations and their adherence to legal obligations to avoid similar predicaments in their investment journeys.

This dictionary encapsulates the key themes of the builder's legal challenges and provides a comprehensive overview of the implications, making it easier for prospective buyers to make informed decisions based on the builder's history.