CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When considering a real estate investment, selecting a trustworthy builder is paramount. In this blog post, we take a closer look at Umaparvati Construction Private Limited, a builder primarily operating in Odisha, to analyze their performance based on available legal data.
Umaparvati Construction is a builder based in Odisha. While their presence in the real estate market is notable, they have encountered some legal issues that potential buyers may find significant when making purchasing decisions.
Examining the builder's legal cases provides essential insights into their operational integrity:
Given the data, Umaparvati Construction has faced challenges that could raise concerns for prospective buyers. The single complaint received and the outcomes of legal proceedings indicate historical difficulties in building a positive reputation. While the builder is operational in Odisha, the lack of favorable legal outcomes may cause hesitation among potential clients.
If you are considering purchasing a property from Umaparvati Construction or any builder with a similar track record, keep the following advice in mind:
Umaparvati Construction Private Limited's performance thus far suggests caution for potential homebuyers. While they navigate the competitive landscape of the Odisha real estate market, prospective clients should remain vigilant and informed before making decisions. By following the tips listed above, buyers can increase their chances of a successful property purchase.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Umaparvati Construction Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key takeaways regarding their legal disputes.
The cases against the builder primarily revolve around three common themes: penalties for project delays, non-compliance with municipal orders, and disputes over project requirements. In the realm of project delays, the builder faced legal challenges resulting in penalties, as seen in the directive to pay a penalty of Rs. 10,000. This highlights an ongoing issue in the construction sector where builders often face scrutiny over adherence to timelines and schedules.
The builder's non-compliance with municipal orders emerges as another significant theme. While specific details of the non-compliance are not outlined in the summary, the fact that the builder was required to upload necessary Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) indicates a failure to fulfill regulatory requirements, which is a common trigger for legal action in the construction industry.
People commonly brought cases against the builder due to disputes over project requirements and the builder’s failure to meet those requirements adequately. This might encompass everything from issues related to project design, construction quality, and adherence to local building codes. The builder's inability to provide sufficient evidence or comply with interim directions likely contributed to their losses in these cases.
The patterns emerging from these summaries suggest that Umaparvati Construction Private Limited faced challenges related to operational compliance and effective project management. The common reasons for the builder's losses include insufficient evidence to defend their actions, non-compliance with legal and regulatory standards, and a failure to fulfill project requirements as mandated by local authorities.
Overall, this analysis serves as a cautionary tale for potential buyers regarding the importance of scrutinizing a builder’s legal history, compliance record, and project management practices before making a purchase decision. It highlights the risks involved in engaging with builders who have unresolved legal disputes, as these issues may indicate broader operational deficiencies.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SuoMotu Complaint C… | Odisha | The case was initiated against M/s Umaparvati Con… | ["Non-filing of QPR… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "", "… | Umaparvati Construc… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/171-of-2024.pdf |