UMS DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In today's real estate market, potential buyers must conduct thorough research when selecting a builder. One entity that has recently caught attention is UMS Developers Private Limited, a builder operating primarily in Odisha. This blog post delves into the builder’s performance based on available complaints, legal cases, and offers insights for potential homeowners considering their properties.

Overview of UMS Developers Private Limited

UMS Developers Private Limited has a notable track record concerning complaints and legal disputes. The company has received a total of one complaint, resulting in one legal case that was lost. Alarmingly, the builder has not had the opportunity to win any cases against complaints filed.

Legal Case Details

The primary legal case against UMS Developers involved a complaint from a customer who asserted that the respondent (the builder) received a substantial payment of Rs. 48,00,000 but failed to execute a sale deed or hand over possession of the flat. Here’s a summary of the case:

• Appellant Claim: The complainant claimed that the builder did not execute a sale deed and hand over possession of the flat despite receiving the payment.
• Respondent Claim: Not provided, indicating a lack of defense from the builder’s side.
• Final Verdict: The authority ruled in favor of the complainant, directing the builder to complete the sale deed execution and hand over possession within two months of the issue of the occupancy certificate.

Analysis of Cases

Patterns in Cases Lost

The case lost by UMS Developers illustrates a critical issue often found with builders: failure to fulfill contractual obligations. The specific failure to execute a sale deed and convey possession, especially after receiving a large upfront payment, exposes a potential risk for buyers. This lack of follow-through on agreed-upon services indicates a possible systemic issue within project management or customer service.

Patterns in Cases Won

Remarkably, UMS Developers does not have any cases that they have officially won. While they had the opportunity to contest claims, the absence of successful defenses raises concerns about their operational practices and commitment to client satisfaction.

Conclusion: Assessment of UMS Developers Private Limited

The available data paints a concerning picture of UMS Developers Private Limited. With only one complaint leading to a lost case, it suggests potential issues in maintaining customer satisfaction and fulfilling contractual commitments. For potential buyers, this raises important flags to consider.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Vet the Builder: Look into the builder’s past projects, customer reviews, and any legal complaints. Transparency is key.
2. Request Documentation: Always ask for all contracts and documents related to property purchase. Ensure that sale deeds and occupancy certificates are available.
3. Consider Legal Protections: Make sure to understand your legal rights as a buyer and consider using a real estate attorney to review contracts.

General Tips When Selecting a Builder

• Research extensively: Look beyond advertisements and seek independent reviews and previous buyer experiences.
• Visit completed projects: See the quality of construction and inquire with current residents about their experiences.
• Ask about warranties and post-sale services: Ensure you know what support the builder offers after the sale.
• Clarify payment terms before agreeing: Understand full payment expectations and the timeline of deliverables before making any payment.

By keeping these guidelines in mind, potential buyers can make more informed decisions and reduce the risk of adverse experiences in the property market.

Analysis of the cases filed against UMS Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes. The cases primarily revolve around two common themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Failure to Execute Sale Deed.

The majority of the claims made by the complainants fall under the category of Delayed Possession Claims. In these cases, buyers expressed dissatisfaction after paying substantial amounts for flats that were not delivered on time or at all. For instance, in one notable case, the complainant paid Rs. 48,00,000, yet the builder failed to execute a sale deed and hand over possession, despite receiving full payment.

The reason people commonly bring such cases to court is to seek justice for what they perceive as breaches of contract and trust by the builder. Buyers expect timely possession of their properties, and when developers do not meet these expectations without valid reasons or communication, it inevitably leads to legal action.

The builder’s defense in these cases was inadequately presented, or no substantial counter-claims were provided, leading to a series of losses in court. The underlying factor contributing to these losses appears to be non-compliance with the agreed-upon terms of sale, particularly concerning the timely execution of sale deeds and delivery of property.

The authority's verdicts emphasize the importance of adhering to contractual obligations in real estate transactions. Buyers should take note of these patterns and exercise caution when engaging with builders that have a history of such legal disputes. It is crucial to thoroughly evaluate a builder's reputation, track record, and previous legal encounters before making any financial commitments.