No Logo Available

UNI HOMES RESIDENTIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED

5.0/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Chhattisgarh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Uni Homes Residential Co-operative Society Limited is a notable player in the real estate sector, particularly recognized for its projects in Chhattisgarh. The builder has maintained a solid reputation, evidenced by its track record in legal disputes.

Performance Overview

With only 2 complaints lodged against the builder, Uni Homes has successfully won all the cases brought forward, highlighting its commitment to customer satisfaction and adherence to legal agreements. This impressive performance underscores the builder's reliability and professionalism in handling client issues.

Legal Case Analysis

Breakdown of the Cases Won

Both legal cases filed by Uni Homes involved similar claims from the appellant, focusing on the lack of promised facilities in the residential complex. The complaints centered around:

  • Incomplete Facilities: The absence of a sewerage treatment plant, rainwater harvesting system, and a boundary wall.
  • Maintenance Issues: Allegations regarding the lack of maintenance provided for the buildings as per …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Incomplete Facilities Claims Quality of Construction Disputes Responsibility for Project Completion

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Uni Homes Residential Co-operative Society Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The builder seems to face several types of disputes, primarily revolving around incomplete facilities, quality of construction, and issues surrounding responsibility for project completion. These themes underscore the common challenges encountered in the real estate development sector.

Common Dispute Themes:

  1. Incomplete Facilities Claims: In multiple cases, buyers claimed that essential facilities promised in brochures were either incomplete or entirely missing, leading to dissatisfaction. Common missing elements included a sewerage treatment plant, rainwater harvesting systems, and boundary walls.
  2. Quality of Construction Disputes: The non-applicants (respondents) frequently argued that the quality of the buildings met the agreed-upon standards, while applicants often expressed dissatisfaction. This indicates an ongoing debate regarding the alignment of buyer expectations with actual outcomes.
  3. Responsibility for Project Completion: Several disputes involved claims regarding who …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review

Interested in buying from UNI HOMES RESIDENTIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED?

Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.