| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive landscape of real estate, it’s crucial for buyers to choose a builder with a solid track record. This blog explores Unimexx Builders and Developers, focusing on their legal standing, complaint history, and overall performance based on provided data.
Overview of Unimexx Builders and Developers
Unimexx Builders and Developers operates primarily in the states of Haryana and Himachal Pradesh. Despite their geographical presence, the company faces significant challenges, as evidenced by their history of legal complaints.
Legal Case Summary
Complaints and Legal Troubles
Unimexx Builders and Developers has received 12 complaints, all of which resulted in negative outcomes for the builder. Notably, they lost all 12 cases, reflecting a concerning pattern regarding their business practices.
Details of Cases Lost
- Pre-deposit Issues: In several cases, the builder's appeals were dismissed primarily due to their failure to comply with pre-deposit conditions mandated by the Real Estate …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Unimexx Builders and Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Disputes over Consideration Payment.
The cases exemplify a series of complaints primarily tied to the promised delivery of flats in the 'Himalayan Habitat' project located in Bajaura, District Kullu, HP. In each instance, the complainants asserted that they had paid for their respective flats, yet possession had not been granted. This points to a significant issue in fulfilling project deadlines and contractual obligations by the builder, which is critical in real estate transactions.
The builder's defense consistently revolved around claims of incomplete payments from the complainants or attempts to justify delays by stating that the project was still under construction. However, the underlying reason for the disputes appears to stem from a lack of effective …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed by Unimexx Builders and Developers, which the builder ultimately lost, reveals several key insights.
One prominent theme is Regulatory Non-Compliance. In multiple instances, the appellant (the builder) contested the decisions made by the Himachal Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, claiming unfair treatment during execution proceedings. However, the cases frequently cited the builder's failure to comply with pre-deposit conditions stipulated under Section 43(5) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. This indicates that non-compliance with regulatory frameworks is a recurrent issue for the builder, which affects their case outcomes significantly.
Another theme observed is the Failure to Provide Hearing Opportunities. In certain cases, the builder contended that they were denied a fair chance to present their objections during execution proceedings. Yet, the respondents successfully argued that the Judgment Debtor had been granted multiple opportunities to respond but chose not to …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from UNIMEXX BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.