UNIQUE SHRI LLP

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, the relationship between builders and buyers can sometimes become contentious, leading to legal disputes. Unique Shri LLP, a builder operating primarily in Rajasthan, has had its fair share of such disputes, with a total of 4 complaints filed against them. This blog aims to dissect their legal performance, analyzing the cases they won and lost.

Overview of Unique Shri LLP's Legal Cases

Unique Shri LLP is involved in a series of disputes that highlight the risks associated with property investments. Among the complaints lodged against them, the builder has lost 2 cases and emerged victorious in another 2.

Cases Lost by Unique Shri LLP

In the two cases where Unique Shri LLP lost, common themes emerged:

1. Refund Requests Due to Non-Execution of Agreements: In both situations, the complainants sought refunds for deposits they claimed had been wrongfully treated as forfeit due to the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Unique Shri LLP, which it lost, reveals several key points across the board. The disputes can primarily be categorized into two main themes: Ex-Parte Orders and Lack of Representation and Illness and Unavailability as Grounds for Appeal.

The cases often revolved around the builder contesting orders that were made without their representation at the hearings. This points to a troubling trend where decisions were made in the builder's absence, resulting in outcomes that might not have accurately reflected their position or defenses. Common reasons for bringing these cases to court included appealing against the validity of such ex-parte orders and arguing that the builder was not provided with adequate opportunities to present their case.

A consistent pattern emerged where the builder attributed their inability to participate in the hearings to illnesses—either their own or that of a family member. This raises …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Unique Shri LLP, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The primary categories of disputes brought to court can be grouped under two main themes: Refund Claims for Non-Executed Agreements and Deposit Disputes and Proportionate Refunds.

In the first theme, complainants sought refunds primarily on the grounds of not having executed agreements for sale. Many buyers claimed that they had made a deposit, expecting to formalize the sale, but faced issues either due to the builder's alleged negligence or failure to proceed with the agreement.

In the second theme, disputes arose regarding the proportion of the deposit made. Complainants argued for refunds based on interpretations of legal provisions, while the builder consistently defended that the deposits were below the minimum threshold required for such claims and demonstrated no fault on their part in the processes involved.

The reasons for …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis