UNITECH LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 37
- States (Active in): Haryana, Karnataka, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu
| CIN | L74899DL1971PLC009720 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 9-Feb-71 |
| Address | 6 COMMUNITY CENTRE SAKET , NEW DELHI, Delhi, India - 110017 |
| Company Status | Public |
Overview of Unitech Limited
Unitech Limited is a notable player in the construction and real estate sector, with projects spanning various states in India, including Tamil Nadu, Haryana, Odisha, Karnataka, and Punjab. However, the company has faced significant scrutiny due to a series of legal complaints, raising concerns among potential buyers. In this article, we will analyze Unitech's complaint history, focusing on trends in the cases won and lost to gain insights into the builder's operational practices and reliability.
Complaint Analysis
Complaints Overview
Unitech Limited has recorded a total of 37 complaints against it, with only 10 cases won and 27 cases lost. This performance raises red flags regarding customer satisfaction and the company’s ability to meet contractual obligations.
Patterns in Lost Cases
An analysis of the cases where Unitech Limited lost reveals several recurring themes:
- Delay in Project Completion: Many complaints centered around delays in the completion of projects and subsequent non-handover of possession. Complainants frequently sought refunds coupled with interest due to the builder's failure to deliver units on time, reflecting a critical issue in project management.
- Supreme Court Involvement: A significant number of lost cases were intertwined with the ongoing litigation in the Supreme Court. The builder often claimed that the matters were sub-judice, suggesting an overreliance on legal loopholes rather than resolving issues directly with clients.
- Withdrawal of Complaints: In multiple instances, complainants withdrew their cases, sometimes under pressure to seek a settlement or due to lack of faith in the resolution process. This indicates a potential flaw in the builder's dispute resolution strategies.
Patterns in Won Cases
On the flip side, Unitech Limited has had some successes, although they are overshadowed by the high number of lost cases. The winning cases show:
- Technicalities of Claims: In several instances, the builder won cases due to complainants' inability to provide compelling evidence or when cases were dismissed for default. This highlights a possible lack of thorough documentation from buyers.
- Failure to Register Projects: A recurring theme in cases won was the failure of opposing parties to properly register their complaints or document their grievances, allowing Unitech to sidestep responsibility in those instances.
- Non-Appearance of Complainants: In many winning cases, the authority ruled in favor of Unitech due to the non-appearance of the complainants during hearings. This emphasizes the importance of active participation in legal processes by buyers.
Overall Assessment
Unitech Limited's performance in legal disputes raises substantial concerns regarding its reliability as a builder. The stark contrast in the number of lost versus won cases suggests systemic issues, particularly around project delivery and customer service. Prospective buyers should exercise caution, taking into account the builder's historical challenges.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Do Your Research: Investigate the builder’s complaint history thoroughly. Look for consumer reviews and ratings to gauge experiences of existing customers.
- Consult Legal Professionals: If considering a purchase, seek legal advice to understand your rights and the builder's obligations.
- Ask About Completion Timelines: Make sure to inquire about projected timelines and any penalties for delays before entering any agreements.
- Ensure Proper Documentation: Keep all agreements and correspondence documented to protect your interests in case issues arise down the line.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Credentials: Ensure the builder is registered with relevant authorities and has completed projects successfully.
- Evaluate Financial Stability: A financially stable builder is less likely to face delays due to funding issues.
- Visit Completed Projects: Where possible, visit past projects to see the quality and timely completion of the builder's work.
- Be Wary of Too-Good-to-Be-True Offers: If a deal seems extraordinary, it may be hiding underlying issues. Always ask why the price is lower than competitors.
In conclusion, while Unitech Limited remains a significant player in the real estate market, its track record should prompt potential buyers to exercise diligence, ensuring that they choose wisely when investing in property.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 142/2017 | Tamil Nadu | The complainant filed a complaint against M/s. Un… | ["Refund of money p… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Rajendran Chingarav… | Unitech Limited | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2017/142-2017.pdf |
| Appeal No. 6 of 2018 | Tamil Nadu | The appellant and respondent entered into a compr… | ["Compromise Agreem… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Rajendran Chingarav… | Unitech Limited | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1KgTNxKkcccke-FbT3uIAqZJba5RIBe4N |
| 20 of 2017 | Punjab | Complaint against Unitech Limited for delay in po… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "Delay in possession of flat"… | Ms. Gurdip Kaur Kho… | Unitech Limited | https://rera.punjab.gov.in/rera/rwdataOrdersJudgements\2019\/complaint_20_of_2017.pdf |
| PBRERA-SAS8O-PR0367 | Punjab | Permila Gupta filed a complaint against Mis Unite… | ["Withdrawn complai… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Permila Gupta | Unitech Limited | https://rera.punjab.gov.in/rera/rwdataOrdersJudgements\2019\/20190614OJbyAuth2b2c6fa4-7e3a-4f6f-916e-e69ee961bf13.pdf |
| PBRERA-SAS80-PR0367 | Punjab | Amrinder Kaur filed a complaint against Unitech L… | ["Withdrawal of com… | {"appellant_claim": "Amrinder Kaur claimed that U… | Amrinder Kaur | Unitech Limited | https://rera.punjab.gov.in/rera/rwdataOrdersJudgementsByAO\2019\/20190407OJbyAO0726b05b-47fc-46f6-bd4b-93656e13ca44.pdf |
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases predominantly revolved around themes such as Delayed Possession Claims, Refund Claims due to Non-Completion, Supreme Court Involvement, Withdrawn Complaints and Settlements, and Moratorium Issues on Complaints.
Under the category of Delayed Possession Claims, many complainants sought refunds or compensation due to delays in project completion and possession handover. This led to disputes where opposing parties claimed refunds for amounts paid for apartments or plots without receiving what was promised within the specified time frame.
Furthermore, several cases highlighted the issue of Refund Claims due to Non-Completion, where buyers sought refunds because projects were still pending completion. Many of these claims were intertwined with discussions around the Supreme Court's involvement, indicating that a significant number of projects were affected by judicial proceedings that restricted the ability to resolve complaints in favor of buyers. This pattern shows how a lack of clarity regarding legal proceedings can muddy the waters for consumers seeking redress.
In many instances, the opposing parties could not sufficiently support their claims due to the ongoing legal complexities, which showcases a clear rationale behind the builder's victories. The builder effectively argued compelling points, such as the necessity for complainants to address their grievances with the newly formed Board of Directors, reinforcing the importance of procedural compliance. Additionally, buyers often prematurely filed claims amidst existing judicial processes, leading to cases being dismissed as sub-judice.
Through this overview, we gain insights into Unitech Limited's reputation in the market. The builder has demonstrated resilience in upholding its interests against potentially unjust claims, suggesting a robust legal strategy. It is essential to acknowledge that while there are valid concerns raised by buyers, some allegations may stem from misunderstandings or miscommunications regarding the actual status of the projects.
Thus, to potential buyers, the takeaway is to approach claims with diligence and ensure their decisions are based on a thorough understanding of the situation. The analysis of these cases emphasizes that although disputes do occur in the real estate sector, there is a notion of due process, where builders like Unitech Limited can often skillfully defend against claims perceived as unfounded or exaggerated. It is vital to gather reliable information and form opinions based on comprehensive facts before making significant financial commitments.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AdCNo. 1290/2019 | Not provided | The complainant withdrew the complaint with a con… | ["Withdrawal of com… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant prayed for w… | Sanjay Thapar | Unitech Limited | https://rera.punjab.gov.in/rera/rwdataOrdersJudgementsByAO\2023\N1390\/20231129FormN_OJbyAO1e97dff1-5f3e-46e0-9e02-5535f11f9b52.pdf |
| CMP/210706/0008099 | Karnataka | Complainant sought refund for apartment not hande… | ["Moratorium", "Ref… | {"appellant_claim": "Refund for apartment not han… | Vivek Shukla | Unitech Limited | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=3193361 |
| CMP/191003/0004394 | Karnataka | Complaint filed for refund of amount paid for apa… | ["Moratorium", "Ref… | {"appellant_claim": "Refund of amount paid for ap… | Unitech Limited | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=3206988 | |
| MA No. 488/2023 in … | Haryana | Sharika Kaul's complaint against Unitech Limited … | ["Settlement", "Wit… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Sharika Kaul | Unitech Limited | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTcwNjA0 |
| 404 & 420 of 2019 | Haryana | Complaint against Unitech Ltd. regarding two proj… | ["Supreme Court pro… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Unitech Limited | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MjA3NzM= |