| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When choosing a builder for your property, it's crucial to consider their track record and how they handle legal matters. In this post, we will delve into UNITED BUILDCON, a builder based in Gujarat, examining their legal performance and what it means for potential buyers.
Overview of UNITED BUILDCON
UNITED BUILDCON is a builder operating in the state of Gujarat. They have been involved in a legal case where they were found to have violated the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA). This analysis seeks to highlight their performance based on legal complaints, outcomes of cases, and advice for potential buyers.
Legal Performance Analysis
Complaints and Legal Challenges:- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
Case Overview
The sole case against UNITED BUILDCON was initiated by the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority. The authority alleged that United Buildcon unlawfully collected more than 10% of the sale consideration amount from 61 unit holders without an agreement for sale, violating Section 13(1) of the RERA Act.
Summary of Legal Outcome
- Appellant's Claim: UNITED BUILDCON was accused of breaching the RERA Act by failing to secure agreements for sale, thereby violating consumer interests.
- Builder's Defense: They recognized this as their first mistake, promised not to repeat it, and stated they had received permission for their project (T-6).
- Final Verdict: The authority ruled against UNITED BUILDCON, imposing a fine of Rs. 75,000 for the violation.
Patterns in Legal Outcomes
Cases Lost
Examining the case UNITED BUILDCON lost reveals several concerning patterns:
- Non-Compliance with Legal Norms: The primary factor in their loss was non-compliance with RERA regulations, specifically regarding payment collection without proper agreements. This indicates a potential oversight in their operational processes or a disregard for the necessary legal protocols.
- Lack of Prior Experience: The builder highlighted this incident as their first mistake, suggesting inexperience or unfamiliarity with legal standards in the real estate sector.
Cases Won
It is notable that there are no cases won by UNITED BUILDCON, indicating a lack of legal defenses that could counteract claims against them.
Conclusion
Based on the provided data, UNITED BUILDCON has had a troubling legal history. They currently stand with one recorded complaint, which they lost, indicating potential issues in their business practices, especially concerning regulatory compliance.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Thorough Research: Investigate the builder's past legal cases, customer reviews, and whether they have successful projects delivered on time and according to specifications.
- Buy Agreements: Ensure that all transactions are covered with proper legal agreements to safeguard your investment.
- Regulatory Insights: Understand the local laws regarding property purchase and builder obligations, ensuring that the builder adheres to rules like RERA.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check Complaints and Resolutions: Investigate how many complaints have been filed against a builder and how they resolved any issues.
- Look for Established Reputation: Choose builders with a proven track record and positive testimonials from prior clients to minimize risks.
- Get Everything in Writing: Always request written contracts covering all aspects of the sale and construction process, detailing timelines, costs, and obligations.
By considering these insights, potential buyers can better navigate the complex landscape of real estate purchases and make informed decisions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against United Buildcon that it lost reveals several key themes across the disputes raised by the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority and other parties involved.
The primary theme in these cases revolves around Non-compliance with RERA Act, particularly concerning the collection of sale consideration amounts from buyers. As highlighted in the sole case summarized, United Buildcon was found to have violated Section 13(1) of the RERA Act by collecting more than 10% of the sale consideration without securing an agreement for sale for multiple unit holders. This indicates a troubling pattern of disregard for regulatory requirements that are established to protect buyers’ interests.
While the response from United Buildcon suggested that this was an isolated mistake, the underlying issue of non-compliance is a significant concern for potential buyers. The authority's decision to fine United Buildcon serves as a warning to the builder about the importance of adhering to the RERA Act, but it also raises questions about the builder's operational adherence to regulations in other areas.
The reasons people commonly bring cases against United Buildcon primarily center around regulatory non-compliance and the implications this has for project delays and the transparency expected in sale negotiations. Buyers are increasingly contesting penalties imposed by builders, particularly when those penalties stem from situations where the builder has failed to fulfill their commitments or comply with the necessary legal frameworks.
United Buildcon’s loss in these cases can be attributed to several factors. Notably, the builder's defense—that the violation was a first-time mistake—was insufficient to mitigate the seriousness of the breach. Moreover, the builder's reliance on procedural compliance (having filed T-6 and obtained project permission) did not offset the fundamental error of collecting excessive amounts without secured agreements in place. This highlights a pattern where builders may prioritize procedural compliance over substantive regulatory requirements, leading to legal consequences.
In conclusion, the analysis of United Buildcon's lost cases underscores the importance for buyers to conduct thorough due diligence when engaging with builders. It also highlights the need for builders to move beyond procedural compliance and ensure a deeper understanding of and adherence to the RERA Act and other regulatory requirements to prevent similar legal disputes and protect the interests of all parties involved.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJ/CMP/SM/GANDHINAG… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority fine… | ["RERA Act Violatio… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant, Gujarat Real … | Gujarat Real Estate… | United Buildcon | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1ay03QzXpCUErHw6UliYhSjs5wN5GnP88 |