UNITED BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS
- No of Complaints: 4
- States (Active in): Madhya Pradesh
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the competitive field of real estate, potential homeowners must tread carefully, as the reputation of builders can significantly impact their investment. One such builder is UNITED BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS, which operates in Madhya Pradesh. In this blog post, we will delve into the various legal challenges faced by this builder, the outcomes of their cases, and what potential buyers should contemplate when considering a property from them.
Overview of Complaints
UNITED BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS has recorded a total of 4 complaints against them, with a concerning outcome of losing all 4 cases. This raises red flags regarding the builder's reliability and the quality of their customer service.
Legal Case Details
Below is a summary of the cases filed against UNITED BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS:
- In the first case, the applicant alleged delays in the completion of their flat, while the builder argued that the applicant was responsible for late payments. The verdict ordered the builder to complete finishing work within 15 days.
- The second and third cases were similar, with the applicant claiming delayed possession and the builder countering that the full payment was pending. The authority directed the applicant to pay the remaining balance before possession could be transferred.
- In the fourth case, the applicant, who was an investor, claimed delays and non-execution of the sale agreement. The verdict required the builder to finish the work within 45 days.
Patterns in Cases
Common Factors in Lost Cases：- Delayed Possession: Each case involved claims of delayed possession, which suggests a recurring issue with the builder's project timelines.
- Payment Disputes: The builder frequently contended that the applicants were not fulfilling their payment obligations, indicating potential issues with financial management and clear communication concerning payment terms.
- No Wins: With every case lost, it reflects a systemic problem in fulfilling contractual obligations and adequately addressing client concerns, resulting in dissatisfied customers.
- Compliance Orders: In every verdict, the builder was ordered to complete certain tasks, hinting that while they may aim to rectify the issues, their projects are not being managed effectively to prevent these situations from arising in the first place.
Conclusion
Overall, the track record of UNITED BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS raises concerns for potential buyers. The company’s inability to win cases indicates systemic challenges in project management and customer service. Prospective owners should exercise caution before proceeding with any transactions.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Look into the builder's history, customer reviews, and any legal disputes.
- Request Transparency: Ensure clear communication regarding payment terms and project timelines from the outset.
- Seek Legal Guidance: Consult with a legal professional to fully understand your rights and obligations in any property transaction.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Credentials: Validate the builder's licenses and qualifications.
- Inspect Previous Projects: Visit existing properties built by the builder to assess the quality of their work.
- Assess Financial Stability: A financially stable builder is likely to be more reliable in completing projects.
- Read Contracts Carefully: Understand all clauses before signing anything, particularly regarding completion timelines and remedies in case of delays.
By keeping these considerations in mind, potential buyers can navigate the complex landscape of real estate with greater confidence.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against United Builders & Developers, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily revolved around three main topics: delayed possession claims, disputes over payment and compensation, and completion delays along with the requisite finishing work.
The majority of the cases fell under the category of delayed possession claims. In these cases, the applicants primarily claimed that the builder had failed to provide them with possession of their flats despite having received full payment. The builder, on the other hand, often counter-claimed that the delay was attributable to the applicants' failure to complete their payments on time. This highlights a significant pattern where the builder consistently sought to shift the blame for delays onto the purchasers rather than acknowledging potential issues in their project management or construction timelines.
Another recurring theme was disputes over payment and compensation. Applicants sought various forms of compensation for the delays, while the builder focused on the repayment of what they claimed were outstanding amounts. This indicates a troubling communication gap between the builder and the buyers, both of whom seemed to be operating under different assumptions about the payment status and the obligations of the other party.
The final theme of completion delays and finishing work emphasizes the importance of ensuring that properties are delivered to buyers in a completed condition. In several cases, the authority directed the builder to complete the finishing work before handing over possession, demonstrating a failure on the builder’s part to meet the expected standards of delivery.
The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases include insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with the timelines set by the authority, and a lack of transparency regarding payment requirements and project completion schedules. The builder’s repeated attempts to attribute delays to buyer actions ultimately did not stand, as the evidence consistently showed failures on the builder's own part to fulfill their contractual obligations.
Overall, this analysis suggests that prospective buyers should exercise caution when considering properties developed by United Builders & Developers. It may be advisable to solicit feedback from previous buyers, closely review payment terms and project timelines, and seek clarity on the builder’s obligations regarding completion and possession dates.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 /-82-8-0655 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant, Adarsh Vanjari, filed a complaint … | ["Delay in completi… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Adarsh Vanjari | United Builders & D… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/053105730599.pdf |
| 2 /-82-8-0652 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant, Shri Adarsh Vanjari and Pushpa Van… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Pushpa Vanjari | United Builders & D… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/155551331756.pdf |
| +/-82-48-0650 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant, Smt. Pushpa Banjari, filed a compl… | ["Delay in completi… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Smt. Pushpa Banjari | United Builders & D… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/232533332253.pdf |