UNITY LAND CONSULTANCY

Introduction

Buying a property is often one of the most significant investments a person can make. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate your builder thoroughly. In this blog post, we will look into Unity Land Consultancy, focusing on their legal track record, particularly the number of cases filed against them, as well as tips for potential buyers considering their properties.

Legal Overview

Unity Land Consultancy has been the subject of 2 legal complaints, both of which they lost. This raises concerns about their reliability and accountability as a builder. Here’s a closer look at the details:

Legal Case Details

1. Case Overview:
   - First Case:
   - Appellant Claim: The allottee claimed that the promoters delayed the possession of the flat and sought interest and compensation.
   - Respondent Claim: The promoters argued that the delay was attributable to factors beyond their control, including a stay by the High Power Committee.
   - Final Verdict: The appeal was partly allowed, directing the promoters to pay interest at 10.5% per annum on the allottee's investment from 01.01.2013 for every month's delay until actual possession was delivered.
   - Second Case:
   - Appellant Claim: The appellant alleged the respondents had failed to pay interest on their investment and provide compensation for delays.
   - Respondent Claim: The respondents contended that they had indeed paid the required interest and compensated for delays.
   - Final Verdict: The court partly allowed the appellant's appeal, ordering the respondents to pay interest at the same rate as the first case and an additional cost of Rs. 20,000/- to the allottee.

Analysis of Lost Cases

In both cases, the common thread is the issue of delayed possession, indicating a pattern where the builder struggled to meet deadlines and commitments. Buyers must be cautious as this might suggest systemic issues in project management or resource allocation.

Analysis of Won Cases

Notably, the builder lost the cases despite them not being outright failures in the arguments put forth. Both verdicts resulted in the allottee receiving a partial victory, which indicates that even when the builder presented claims of external delays, the court found in favor of the consumer regarding compensation for these delays.

The repeated mandate for payment of interest further emphasizes that while the builder might have valid claims about external circumstances affecting timelines, the onus of responsibility ultimately fell on them to ensure buyer satisfaction.

Conclusion

Based on the provided legal history, Unity Land Consultancy has demonstrated a concerning track record, having no cases won and two lost. This raises red flags about their reliability as a builder and their ability to fulfill promises made to homebuyers.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Do Your Research: Investigate the builder’s reputation and past projects.
• Consider Legal History: Give weight to a builder’s legal history, particularly issues related to possession delays and unresolved complaints.
• Seek Transparency: Ensure all project timelines and financial obligations are thoroughly discussed and documented.

General Buying Tips

• Check Credentials: Ensure the builder is well-established and reviews show trust and satisfaction.
• Official Documentation: Request all agreements, approvals, and permits in writing.
• Visit Projects: If possible, visit completed projects to assess quality and overall satisfaction of previous buyers.

In conclusion, while Unity Land Consultancy may have some projects underway in Maharashtra, potential buyers must exercise caution and thoroughly evaluate their options before committing to any purchase.

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Unity Land Consultancy, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around two main topics: delayed possession claims and disputes over interest and compensation for these delays.

Many of the claims made by the allottees in these cases focused on the builder's failure to deliver possession of their flats on time. The builder attributed these delays to various external factors, particularly the stay granted by the High Power Committee. However, the legal outcome did not favor the builder, as evidenced by the partly allowed appeals.

A common reason for bringing cases to court in this instance was the builder’s inability to provide timely possession, which led to claims for interest and compensation from the aggrieved parties. The builders' defense often revolved around their contentions that they had adhered to their obligations, including paying interest and providing compensation, yet the verdicts suggest a discrepancy between the builders' assertions and their actual performance.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to a failure to fulfill their contractual obligations regarding timely delivery and adequate compensation for delays. The legal decisions mandated the builder to pay interest at the rate of 10.5% per annum for every month's delay, demonstrating a systemic issue with their project management and compliance with regulatory requirements.

The patterns emerging from these summaries highlight a concerning trend where builders may underestimate the legal implications of delays and the importance of transparent communication with buyers regarding project timelines and complications.